Interleukin-2 with interferon- α 2a and 5-fluorouracil improves objective response rate compared with tamoxifen in people with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-92
Author(s):  
A. Ravaud
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Interferon Α

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of First-Line Immune-Based Combination Therapies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza ELAIDI ◽  
Letuan PHAN ◽  
Delphine Borchiellini ◽  
Philippe BARTHELEMY ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line

Background: Three drug-combinations, ipilimumab-nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo), pembrolizumab-axitinib (Pembro-Axi) and avelumab-axitinib (Ave-Axi), have received regulatory approvals in USA and Europe for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell component (mRCC). However, no head-to-head comparison data are available to identify the best option. Therefore, we aimed to compare these new treatments in the first-line setting. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in Pubmed, the Cochrane library and clinicaltri-al.gov website from January 2015 to October 2019, for any randomized controlled trials of treatment-naïve patients with mRCC. The process was performed according to PRISMA guide-lines. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis with two different approaches. The out-comes for analysis were overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate. Results: Our search identified 3 published phase 3 randomized clinical trials (2835 patients). In the contrast-based model, Ave-Axi (SUCRA: 83%) and Pembro-Axi (SUCRA: 80%) exhibited the best ranking probabilities for PFS. For OS, Pembro-Axi (SUCRA: 96%) was the most pref-erable option against Ave-Axi and Ipi-Nivo. Objective response rate analysis showed Ave-Axi as the best (SUCRA= 94%) and Pembro-Axi as second best option. In the parametric models, risk of progression was comparable for Ave-Axi and Ipi-Nivo, whereas Pembro-Axi exhibited a lower risk during the first 6 months of treatment and a higher risk afterward. Furthermore, Pembro-Axi exhibited a net advantage in terms of OS over the two other regimens, while Ave-Axi was the least preferable option. Conclusions: Overall evidences suggested pembrolizumab plus axitinib may be the best option.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of First-Line Immune-Based Combination Therapies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Elaidi ◽  
Letuan Phan ◽  
Delphine Borchiellini ◽  
Philippe Barthelemy ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line

Three drug combinations, ipilimumab-nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo), pembrolizumab-axitinib (Pembro-Axi), and avelumab-axitinib (Ave-Axi), have received regulatory approval in the USA and Europe for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell component (mRCC). However, no head-to-head comparison data are available to identify the best option. Therefore, we aimed to compare these new treatments in a first-line setting. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for any randomized controlled trials of treatment-naïve patients with mRCC, from January 2015 to October 2019. The process was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis with two different approaches, a contrast-based model comparing HRs and ORs between studies and arm-based using parametric modeling. The outcomes for the analysis were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate. Our search identified 3 published phase 3 randomized clinical trials (2835 patients). In the contrast-based model, Ave-Axi (SUCRA = 83%) and Pembro-Axi (SUCRA = 80%) exhibited the best ranking probabilities for PFS. For overall survival (OS), Pembro-Axi (SUCRA = 96%) was the most preferable option against Ave-Axi and Ipi-Nivo. Objective response rate analysis showed Ave-Axi as the best (SUCRA: 94%) and Pembro-Axi as the second best option. In the parametric models, the risk of progression was comparable for Ave-Axi and Ipi-Nivo, whereas Pembro-Axi exhibited a lower risk during the first 6 months of treatment and a higher risk afterwards. Furthermore, Pembro-Axi exhibited a net advantage in terms of OS over the two other regimens, while Ave-Axi was the least preferable option. Overall evidence suggests that pembrolizumab plus axitinib seems to have a slight advantage over the other two combinations.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The CheckMate 016 Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (34) ◽  
pp. 3851-3858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
David F. McDermott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Purpose Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown enhanced antitumor activity compared with monotherapy in tumor types such as melanoma. The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in combination, and nivolumab plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Safety and efficacy results from the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arms of the study are presented. Patients and Methods Patients with mRCC received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (N3I1), nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N1I3), or nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N3I3) every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or toxicity. End points included safety (primary), objective response rate, and overall survival (OS). Results All patients in the N3I3 arm (n = 6) were censored at the time of analysis as a result of dose-limiting toxicity or other reasons. Forty-seven patients were treated in both the N3I1 and the N1I3 arm, and baseline patient characteristics were balanced between arms. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 38.3% and 61.7% of the patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 22.3 months, the confirmed objective response rate was 40.4% in both arms, with ongoing responses in 42.1% and 36.8% of patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. The 2-year OS was 67.3% and 69.6% in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy demonstrated manageable safety, notable antitumor activity, and durable responses with promising OS in patients with mRCC.

Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Fyfe ◽  
R I Fisher ◽  
S A Rosenberg ◽  
M Sznol ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Median Response

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred fifty-five assessable patients were entered onto seven phase II clinical trials. Proleukin (aldesleukin; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 or 720,000 IU/kg was administered by 15-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 8 hours for up to 14 consecutive doses over 5 days as clinically tolerated with maximum support, including pressors. A second identical cycle of treatment was scheduled following 5 to 9 days of rest, and courses could be repeated every 6 to 12 weeks in stable or responding patients. RESULTS The overall objective response rate was 14% (90% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 19%), with 12 (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 24 (9%) partial responses (PRs). Responses occurred in all sites of disease, including bone, intact primary tumors, and visceral metastases, and in patients with large tumor burdens or bulky individual lesions. The median response duration for patients who achieved a CR has not been reached, but was 19.0 months for those who achieved a PR. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was the only predictive prognostic factor for response to IL-2. While treatment was associated with severe acute toxicities, these generally reversed rapidly after therapy was completed. However, 4% of patients died of adverse events judged to be possibly or probably treatment-related. CONCLUSION High-dose IL-2 appears to benefit some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma by producing durable CRs or PRs. Despite severe acute treatment-associated toxicities, IL-2 should be considered for initial therapy of patients with appropriately selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Interleukin-2, Interferon-α and Interleukin-2 plus Interferon-α in Renal Cell Carcinoma. A Randomized Phase Ii Trial

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 534-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Boccardo ◽  
Alessandra Rubagotti ◽  
Luciano Canobbio ◽  
Enzo Galligioni ◽  
Roberto Sorio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
To Receive

Background The purpose of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon (IFN), either alone or in combination, in comparable groups of patients affected by advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients and methods In order to limit selection biases, treatment was allocated on a random basis. Patients randomized to IL-2 alone were scheduled to receive eight rIL-2 24-hour i.v. infusion cycles, days 1 to 4, at a daily dose of 18 x 106 IU/m2 for a total of 25 weeks. Patients randomized to IFN alone were scheduled to receive rIFN-α at a daily dose of 6 x 106 IU/m2, days 1, 3 and 5, every week for a total of 52 weeks. Patients randomized to the combination of IFN and IL-2 were given the same drugs at the same daily doses for a total of 24 weeks. Drug dose was modified according to toxicity. Results Twenty-three percent (95% CI: ± 17.5) of patients treated with IL-2 alone showed an objective response to treatment (9% CR). The corresponding figures in patients treated with IFN alone or IFN plus IL-2 were 9% (95% CI: ± 11.9) and 9% (95% CI: ± 11.9), respectively. Complete responses were observed only in patients treated with IL-2. The median duration of response in the IL-2 arm was 18 months (range, 9.5-24). The duration of the two responses achieved by IFN alone was seven and nine, months, respectively. The corresponding figures in the two patients responding to the combination of IFN with IL-2 were 19 and 27 months, respectively. Total IL-2 dose appeared to be a major predictor of response. Only a minority of patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity, the incidence being higher in those treated with IL-2 or IL-2 plus IFN. Conclusions Neither IFN nor IL-2 or the combination of the two appear to be very active in patients with advanced RCC, even when trial entry was restricted to patients with relatively indolent disease. This stresses the need for the development of new approaches.

A FavorAx study of axitinib in favorable risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsimafeyeu ◽  
Pavel Borisov ◽  
Ahmed Abdelgafur ◽  
Roman Leonenkov ◽  
Olga Novikova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
History Of

666 Background: Targeted therapy with axitinib resulted in a greater objective response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib in patients with previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in AXIS study. 75% of patients had intermediate and poor IMDC prognosis. In this phase 2 study, we assessed the activity of axitinib in mRCC patients with favourable risk and a history of prior VEGFR-directed therapy. Methods: Patients were required to have clear cell mRCC, favourable risk according to IMDC criteria, and to have received first-line treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib. Prior treatment with other agents was not permitted. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. Additional endpoints included response rate, safety, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, 62% of whom were male. Median age was 59 years. 11 (52%) patients had 2 and more metastatic sites. 67% and 33% of patients received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib with a median PFS of 17 months (95% CI 14-20). After a median follow-up of 16 months, the median PFS and OS was not yet reached. The current study did achieve its primary endpoint based on the 10-month PFS of 71.4%. 3 (14.3%) patients had confirmed partial responses and 14 (66.7%) had stable disease. No grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed; the most frequent grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (57.1%), fatigue (57.1%), GI (33%) and skin (19%) toxicity. 7 patients had dose-escalation of axitinib and 1 patient had dose reduction. Conclusions: The encouraging PFS and favorable safety profile observed in FavorAx study support the administration of axitinib in mRCC patients with favourable IMDC risk and a history of prior sunitinib or pazopanib. Clinical trial information: NCT02700568.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon α in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma-Less efficacy compared with intravenous interleukin-2 and interferon α

Cancer ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (11) ◽  
pp. 2324-2330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Rémy Delva ◽  
Fréderic Gomez ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
Jean-Yves Douillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Interferon Α

Prolonged continuous intravenous infusion interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer-cell therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 960-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Thompson ◽  
K L Shulman ◽  
M C Benyunes ◽  
C G Lindgren ◽  
C Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Lak Cells ◽  
Total Response ◽  
Total Response Rate

PURPOSE Two consecutive protocols of continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells were carried out in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to determine the response rate and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS In both protocols, patients received induction IL-2 at 6 x 10(6) U/m2/d on days 1 to 5, and underwent leukapheresis on days 7 to 9 at the peak of rebound lymphocytosis. LAK cells were generated by a 5-day incubation with IL-2 at 1,000 U/mL, and were infused on days 12 to 14. For the first 20 patients (protocol A), maintenance IL-2 was administered at 6 x 10(6) U/m2/d on days 12 to 16. On the assumption that less IL-2 might be required to maintain rather than to induce LAK activity, and that a longer duration of maintenance IL-2 might enhance LAK survival and function in vivo, the protocol for the subsequent 22 patients (protocol B) was altered so that the maintenance phase consisted of a lower dose of IL-2 (2 x 10(6) U/m2/d) administered for a longer period of time (days 10 to 20). RESULTS In protocol A, there were two complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses (PRs), for a total response rate of 25%. One PR was surgically converted into a CR. The durations of the CRs are 36+, 18+, and 18+ months. Hypotension and capillary leak were most severe during maintenance, which limited the median duration of maintenance IL-2 to 4 days. In protocol B, no patient experienced severe hypotension, and the median duration of maintenance IL-2 was 9 days. Two patients exhibited a CR and seven a PR, for a total response rate of 41%. Two PRs were surgically converted to CRs. The durations of CR are 14+, 9+, 6+, and 5+ months. In both protocols, the CIV induction regimen resulted in marked rebound lymphocytosis (mean, 11,097/microL) and LAK-cell yield (mean, 18.1 x 10(10)). The cumulative response rate was 14 of 42 patients, or 33% (95% confidence interval, 19% to 47%). CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that both protocols of CIV IL-2 plus LAK cells have substantial antitumor activity, and that a longer maintenance phase of IL-2 at a lower dose is associated with significantly less toxicity without a loss of therapeutic efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document