Uterine Massage to Reduce Blood Loss Before Delivery of the Placenta in Caesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shitong Zhang ◽  
Xianhu Fu
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Reduce Blood Loss ◽  
Uterine Massage

Abstract Background/Objective To estimate the effectiveness of uterine massage UM in reducing blood loss before delivery of placenta in CS. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 1393 women who delivered with CS. Patients who underwent UM (671women) were compared with those who underwent controlled cord traction (722 women). According to risk assessment of PPH, 2 groups were both divided to low risk group and high risk group. Outcomes included blood loss amount within 2 h after delivery, incidence of PPH and intractable PPH. Results Blood loss amount within 2 h was lower in UM group than CCT group(516.6±196.5 ml compared with 674.1±272.2 ml, P<0.01). The incidence of PPH and intractable PPH didn’t differ significantly between the 2 groups (6.7% compared with 9.1%, P=0.09 and 3.9% compared with 5.3%, P=0.22,respectively).In high risk group, the amount of blood loss within 2 h and the incidence of PPH were both lower in UM group (n=382) than CCT group (n=407) (576.8±228.1 ml compared with 854.9±346.1 ml, P<0.01 and 7.1% compared with 11.3%,P=0.04 ,respectively). The incidence of intractable PPH didn’t differ significantly between the 2 groups (4.7% compared with 6.9%,P=0.19). In low risk group, the 3 outcomes didn’t differ significantly between the 2 groups(n=289 vs. 315) (428.5±172.6 ml compared with 447.9±180.5 ml; 6.2% compared with 6.3%; 2.8% compared with 3.2%; P=0.56, 0.95 and 0.77,respectively). Conclusion In high risk patients of PPH, UM before delivery of placenta contributed to reduce blood loss in CS.

scholarly journals Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha D. Sawaya ◽  
Cynthia Wakil ◽  
Adonis Wazir ◽  
Sami Shayya ◽  
Iskandar Berbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Minor Head Trauma ◽  
Scan Rate

Abstract Background Managing children with minor head trauma remains challenging for physicians who evaluate for the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) identification. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules were adopted in our pediatric emergency department (PED) in December 2013 to identify children at low risk for ciTBI. This study aimed to evaluate this implementation’s impact on CT rates and clinical outcomes. Methods Retrospective cohort study on pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to the PED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Participants were divided into pre- (December 2012 to December 2013) and post-PECARN (January 2014 to December 2016) groups. Patients were further divided into < 2 and ≥ 2 years and stratified into groups of low, intermediate and high risk for ciTBI. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine differences between both groups. Results We included 1362 children of which 425 (31.2%) presented pre- and 937 (68.8%) presented post-PECARN rules implementation with 1090 (80.0%) of low, 214 (15.7%) of intermediate and 58 (4.3%) of high risk for ciTBI. CTs were ordered on 92 (21.6%) pre- versus 174 (18.6%) patients post-PECARN (p = 0.18). Among patients < 2 years, CT rates significantly decreased from 25.2% (34/135) to 16.5% (51/309) post-PECARN (p = 0.03), and dropped in all risk groups but only significantly for low risk patients from 20.7% (24/116) to 11.4% (30/264) (p = 0.02). There was no significant decrease in CT rates in patients ≥2 years (20% pre (58/290) vs 19.6% post (123/628), p = 0.88). There was no increase in bounce back numbers, nor in admission rates or positive CT findings among bounce backs. Conclusions PECARN rules implementation did not significantly change the overall CT scan rate but reduced the CT scan rate in patients aged < 2 years at low risk of ciTBI. The implementation did not increase the number of missed ciTBI.

scholarly journals Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha Sawaya ◽  
Cynthia Wakil ◽  
Adonis Wazir ◽  
Sami Shayya ◽  
Iskandar Berbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Minor Head Trauma ◽  
Scan Rate

Abstract Background: Managing children with minor head trauma remains challenging for physicians who evaluate for the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) identification. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules were adopted in our pediatric emergency department (PED) in December 2013 to identify children at low risk for ciTBI. This study aimed to evaluate this implementation’s impact on CT rates and clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to the PED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Participants were divided into pre- (December 2012 to 2013) and post-PECARN (January 2014 to December 2016) groups. Patients were further divided into <2 and ≥2 years and stratified into groups of low, intermediate and high risk for ciTBI. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine differences between both groups. Results: We included 1362 children of which 425 (31.2%) presented pre- and 937 (68.8%) presented post-PECARN rules implementation with 1090 (80.0%) of low, 214 (15.7%) of intermediate and 58 (4.3%) of high risk for ciTBI. CTs were ordered on 92 (21.6%) pre- versus 174 (18.6%) patients post-PECARN (p=0.18). Among patients <2 years, CT rates significantly decreased from 25.2% (34/135) to 16.5% (51/309) post-PECARN (p=0.03), and dropped in all risk groups but only significantly for low risk patients from 20.7% (24/116) to 11.4% (30/264) (p=0.02). There was no significant decrease in CT rates in patients ≥2 years (20% pre (58/290) vs 19.6% post (123/628), p=0.88). There was no increase in bounce back numbers, nor in admission rates or positive CT findings among bounce backs. Conclusions: PECARN rules implementation did not significantly change the overall CT scan rate but reduced the CT scan rate in patients aged <2 years at low risk of ciTBI. The implementation did not increase the number of missed ciTBI.

scholarly journals Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha Sawaya ◽  
Cynthia Wakil ◽  
Adonis Wazir ◽  
Sami Shayya ◽  
Iskandar Berbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Minor Head Trauma ◽  
Scan Rate

Abstract Background: Managing children with minor head trauma remains challenging for physicians who evaluate for the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) identification. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules were adopted in our pediatric emergency department (PED) in December 2013 to identify children at low risk for ciTBI. This study aimed to evaluate this implementation’s impact on CT rates and clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to the PED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Participants were divided into pre- (December 2012 to 2013) and post-PECARN (January 2014 to December 2016) groups. Patients were further divided into <2 and ≥2 years and stratified into groups of low, intermediate and high risk for ciTBI. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine differences between both groups. Results: We included 1362 children of which 425 (31.2%) presented pre- and 937 (68.8%) presented post-PECARN rules implementation with 1090 (80.0%) of low, 214 (15.7%) of intermediate and 58 (4.3%) of high risk for ciTBI. CTs were ordered on 92 (21.6%) pre- versus 174 (18.6%) patients post-PECARN (p=0.18). Among patients <2 years, CT rates significantly decreased from 25.2% (34/135) to 16.5% (51/309) post-PECARN (p=0.03), and dropped in all risk groups but only significantly for low risk patients from 20.7% (24/116) to 11.4% (30/264) (p=0.02). There was no significant decrease in CT rates in patients ≥2 years (20% pre (58/290) vs 19.6% post (123/628), p=0.88). There was no increase in bounce back numbers, nor in admission rates or positive CT findings among bounce backs. Conclusions: PECARN rules implementation did not significantly change the overall CT scan rate but reduced the CT scan rate in patients aged <2 years at low risk of ciTBI. The implementation did not increase the number of missed ciTBI.

scholarly journals Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha Sawaya ◽  
Cynthia Wakil ◽  
Adonis Wazir ◽  
Sami Shayya ◽  
Iskandar Berbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Minor Head Trauma

Abstract Background Managing children with minor head trauma remains challenging for physicians who evaluate for the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) identification. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules were adopted in our pediatric emergency department (PED) in December 2013 to identify children at low risk for ciTBI. This study aimed to evaluate this implementation’s impact on CT rates and clinical outcomes. Methods Retrospective cohort study on pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to the PED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Participants were divided into pre- (December 2012 to 2013) and post-PECARN (January 2014 to December 2016) groups. Patients were further divided into <2 and ≥2 years and stratified into groups of low, intermediate and high risk for ciTBI. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine differences between both groups. Results We included 1362 children of which 425 (31.2%) presented pre- and 937 (68.8%) presented post-PECARN rules implementation with 1090 (80.0%) of low, 214 (15.7%) of intermediate and 58 (4.3%) of high risk for ciTBI. CTs were ordered on 92 (21.6%) pre- versus 174 (18.6%) patients post-PECARN (p=0.18). Among patients <2 years, CT rates significantly decreased from 25.2% to 16.5% post-PECARN (p=0.03), and dropped in all risk groups but only significantly for low risk patients from 20.7% to 11.4% (p=0.02). There was no significant decrease in CT rates in patients ≥2 years. There was no increase in bounce-backs numbers, nor in admission rates or positive CT findings among bounce-backs. Conclusions PECARN rules implementation reduced CT rates, most significantly among patients <2 years at low risk for ciTBI. The implementation did not increase the number of missed ciTBI.

scholarly journals Clinical Performance Status and Technical Factors Affecting Outcomes from Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Interventions; A Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C. Makris ◽  
Andrew C. Macdonald ◽  
Kader Allouni ◽  
Hannah Corrigall ◽  
Charles R. Tapping ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Karnofsky Score ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Biliary Interventions

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a ‘Modified Karnofsky Scoring System’ on outcomes and provide real-world data regarding the UK practice of biliary interventions. Materials and Methods A prospective multi-centred cohort study was performed. The pre-procedure modified Karnofsky score, the incidence of sepsis, complications, biochemical improvement and mortality were recorded out to 30 days post procedure. Results A total of 292 patients (248 with malignant lesions) were suitable for inclusion in the study. The overall 7 and 30 day mortality was 3.1% and 16.1%, respectively. The 30 day sepsis rate was 10.3%. In the modified Karnofsky ‘high risk’ group the 7 day mortality was 9.7% versus 0% for the ‘low risk’ group (p = 0.002), whereas the 30 day mortality was 28.8% versus 13.3% (p = 0.003). The incidence of sepsis at 30 days was 19% in the high risk group versus 3.3% at the low risk group (p = 0.001) Conclusion Percutaneous biliary interventions in the UK are safe and effective. Scoring systems such as the Karnofsky or the modified Karnofsky score hold promise in allowing us to identify high risk groups that will need more careful consideration and enhanced patient informed consent but further research with larger studies is warranted in order to identify their true impact on patient selection and outcomes post biliary interventions.

scholarly journals The iBerry study: a longitudinal cohort study of adolescents at high risk of psychopathology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina H. Grootendorst-van Mil ◽  
Diandra C. Bouter ◽  
Witte J. G. Hoogendijk ◽  
Stefanie F. L. M. van Jaarsveld ◽  
Henning Tiemeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Transition To Adulthood ◽  
Behavioral Problems ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Population Based ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Rate

AbstractThe iBerry study is a population-based cohort study designed to investigate the transition from subclinical symptoms to a psychiatric disorder. Adolescents were selected based on their self-reported emotional and/or behavioral problems assessed by completing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-youth (SDQ-Y) in their first year of high school. A total of 16,736 SDQ-Y questionnaires completed in the academic years 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 by students in the greater Rotterdam area in the Netherlands were screened. A high-risk group of adolescents was then selected based on the 15% highest-scoring adolescents, and a low-risk group was randomly selected from the 85% lowest-scoring adolescents, with a 2.5:1 ratio between the number of high-risk and low-risk adolescents. These adolescents were invited to come with one parent for a baseline visit consisting of interviews, questionnaires, neuropsychological tests, and biological measurements to assess determinants of psychopathology. A total of 1022 high-risk and low-risk adolescents (mean age at the first visit: 15.0 years) enrolled in the study. The goal of the iBerry study is to follow these adolescents for a 10-year period in order to monitor any changes in their symptoms. Here, we present the study design, response rate, inclusion criteria, and the characteristics of the cohort; in addition, we discuss possible selection effects. We report that the oversampling procedure was successful at selecting a cohort of adolescents with a high rate of psychiatric problems based on comprehensive multi-informant measurements. The future results obtained from the iBerry Study will provide new insights into the way in which the mental health of high-risk adolescents changes as they transition to adulthood. These findings will therefore facilitate the development of strategies designed to optimize mental healthcare and prevent psychopathology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document