minor head trauma
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

309
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Gardner ◽  
Thomas W. McLean ◽  
James E. Winslow

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-323
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kubilay Gökçe ◽  
Özlem Güler ◽  
Hakan Hakkoymaz ◽  
Ali İhsan Kilci ◽  
Cebrail Öztürk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taraneh Naghibi ◽  
Mina Rostami ◽  
Behrad Jamali ◽  
Zhaleh Karimimoghaddam ◽  
Alireza Zeraatchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Deciding whether a cranial Computed Tomography (CT) scan in a patient with minor head trauma (MHT) is necessary or not has always been challenging. Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a fundamental part of MHT managing especially in children who are more vulnerable in terms of brain CT radiation consequences and TBI. Defining some indications to timely and efficiently predict the likelihood of TBI is necessary. Thus, we aimed to determine the impact of clinical findings to predict the need for brain CT in children with MHT. Methods In a prospective cohort study, 200 children (2 to 14 years) with MHT were included from 2019 to 2020. The data of MHT-related clinical findings were gathered. The primary and secondary outcomes were defined as a positive brain CT and any TBI requiring neurosurgery intervention, respectively. In statistical analysis, we performed Binary Logistic regression analysis, Fisher’s exact test and independent samples t-test using SPSS V.26. Results The mean age of participants was 6.5 ± 3.06 years. Ninety patients underwent brain CT. The most common clinical finding and injury mechanism were headache and falling from height, respectively. The results of brain CTs were positive in seven patients (3.5%). We identified three predicting factors for an abnormal brain CT including headache, decreased level of consciousness, and vomiting. Conclusion We showed that repetitive vomiting (≥2), headache, and decreased level of consciousness are predicting factors for an abnormal brain CT in children with MHT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Farouq Hamidi ◽  
Hidayatullah Hamidi

Abstract Background Intracranial arachnoid cysts are common, cerebrospinal fluid-filled, innocent lesions that are usually detected incidentally on brain imaging. They may rupture and complicate due to subdural hematoma or hygroma after minor trauma. Case summary Authors present two cases of ruptured middle cranial fossa arachnoid cysts in adolescent (12-year-old and 15-year-old) Afghan boys presenting with subdural hygroma after minor trauma. Conclusion Imaging work-up is necessary for symptomatic patients following minor head trauma as incidentally detected ruptured intracranial arachnoid cysts can be responsible for the symptoms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-191
Author(s):  
Bo Sung Kwon ◽  
Hyung Jun Song ◽  
Jun Hee Lee

Objective Among the pediatric population with minor head trauma, it is difficult to determine an indication for the usage of brain computerized tomography (CT). Our study aims to compare the efficiency of the most commonly used clinical decision rules: the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) and Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head Injury 2 (CATCH2).Methods This retrospective study investigated whether the PECARN and CATCH2 rules were applicable to Korean children with minor head trauma for reducing the use of brain CT imaging, while detecting intracranial pathology.Results Overall, 251 patients (0–5 years old) admitted to emergency rooms within 24 hours of injury were included between August 2015 to August 2018. The performance results are as follows: the PECARN and CATCH2 rules had a sensitivity of 80.00% (51.91%–95.67%) and 100% (78.20%–100.00%) with a specificity of 28.39% (22.73%–34.60%) and 15.25% (10.92%–20.49%), respectively; the negative predictive values were 98.58% and 100%, respectively. Overall, the CATCH2 rule was more successful than the PECARN rule in detecting intracranial pathology; however, there was no significant difference between them. Furthermore, the PECARN and CATCH2 rules lowered the rate of head CT imaging in our study group.Conclusion Both the rules significantly lowered the rate of indicated brain CT. However, since the CATCH2 rule had higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than the PECARN rule, it is more appropriate to be used in emergency rooms for detecting intracranial pathology in children with minor head trauma.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (S2) ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
Doug Wolfe ◽  
Andrew Knighton ◽  
Angelene Hunt ◽  
Neer Shrestha ◽  
Allison Neeley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-520
Author(s):  
Korkut BOZAN ◽  
Abdullah ALGIN ◽  
Serdar ÖZDEMİR ◽  
Mehmet Özgür ERDOĞAN ◽  
Nazmiye KOYUNCU ◽  
...  

The objective of present study is to evaluate mechanisms and causes of head trauma, factors influencing management of pediatric minor head trauma, to highlight decision making processes in diagnostic imaging as well as searching for preventive measures for head trauma. Children younger than two years of age who were admitted to emergency department in one-year study period due to minor head trauma were included to the study. To be inside or outside of house did not significantly change the incidence of falls for children younger than two years of age (p=0.096). Incidence of falls was significantly increased at living rooms (p=0.01) and bathrooms (p=0.036). Incidence of scalp hematomas was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (p=0.006). Asymptomatic admission after a minor injury was not a significant factor on decision of diagnostic imaging. A patient’s asymptomatic presentation should not be used as a criterion to rule out cerebral injuries. A lack of obvious signs and symptoms during evaluation does not exclude TBI. Existing serious symptoms should lead to a quick evaluation of patient to rule out a possible surgical emergency. Scalp hematomas are significantly associated with cerebral injury and are a predictor of brain injury. Clinicians should have a lower threshold for imaging in children<2 years of age.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 344
Author(s):  
Roel Hubert Louis Haeren ◽  
Behnam Rezai Jahromi ◽  
Mika Niemela

Background: Carotid artery dissections (CADs) are a relatively rare disorder, whereas intracranial aneurysms (IAs) form a common cerebrovascular pathology. Since both vascular entities share similar risk factors and associations with connective tissue and vascular disorders, a common pathogenesis has been suggested. Here, we present a case of the concomitant occurrence of a CAD and a ruptured basilar trunk aneurysm (BTA). In the discussion, we elaborate on both vascular entities and have reviewed the literature on their concomitant incidence and potential shared pathogenesis. Case Description: We present a case of a 40-year-old female patient who was admitted to our hospital because of subarachnoid hemorrhage following a minor head trauma. Imaging revealed a BTA and unilateral extracranial dissection of the internal carotid artery. Despite coiling of the aneurysm, stenting of the dissection, and antithrombotic therapy, the patient died due to extensive cerebral ischemia sequelae. Conclusion: CAD and BTAs have both been associated with a vascular vulnerability but their concomitant occurrence has not been described previously. The previous studies have suggested an increased incidence of IAs in patients with a CAD and vice versa. However, the number of studies and reports on this mutual increased incidence is limited. Therefore, a shared pathogenesis seems rather speculative. In our case, we suggest that a posttraumatic CAD-induced hemodynamic alterations resulting in rupture of the saccular BTA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document