scholarly journals UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. E37-E49
Author(s):  
Keith Siau ◽  
Margaret G Keane ◽  
Helen Steed ◽  
Grant Caddy ◽  
Nick Church ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Despite the high-risk nature of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a robust and standardized credentialing process to ensure competency before independent practice is lacking worldwide. On behalf of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), we aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations to form the framework of ERCP training and certification in the UK. Methods Under the oversight of the JAG, a modified Delphi process was conducted with stakeholder representation from the British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, trainees and trainers. Recommendations on ERCP training and certification were formulated after formal literature review and appraised using the GRADE tool. These were subjected to electronic voting to achieve consensus. Accepted statements were peer-reviewed by JAG and relevant Specialist Advisory Committees before incorporation into the ERCP certification pathway. Results In total, 27 recommendation statements were generated for the following domains: definition of competence (9 statements), acquisition of competence (8 statements), assessment of competence (6 statements) and post-certification support (4 statements). The consensus process led to the following criteria for ERCP certification: 1) performing ≥ 300 hands-on procedures; 2) attending a JAG-accredited ERCP skills course; 3) in modified Schutz 1–2 procedures: achieving native papilla cannulation rate ≥80%, complete bile duct clearance ≥ 70 %, successful stenting of distal biliary strictures ≥ 75 %, physically unassisted in ≥ 80 % of cases; 4) 30-day post-ERCP pancreatitis rates ≤5 %; and 5) satisfactory performance in formative and summative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessments. Conclusions JAG certification in ERCP has been developed following evidence-based consensus to quality assure training and to ultimately improve future standards of ERCP practice.

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A Ison ◽  
Helen Fifer ◽  
Simon Gwynn ◽  
Paddy Horner ◽  
Peter Muir ◽  
...  

Despite Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) being increasingly recognised as a genital pathogen in men and women, awareness and utility of commercially available MG-testing has been low. The opinion of UK sexual health clinicians and allied professionals was sought on how MG-testing should be used. Thirty-two consensus statements were developed by an expert group and circulated to clinicians and laboratory staff, who were asked to evaluate their level of agreement with each statement; 75% agreement was set as the threshold for defining consensus for each statement. A modified Delphi approach was used and high levels of agreement obviated the need to test the original statement set further. Of 201 individuals who received questionnaires, 60 responded, most (48) being sexual health consultants, more than 10% of the total in the UK. Twenty-seven (84.4%) of the statements exceeded the 75% threshold. Respondents strongly supported MG-testing of patients with urethritis, pelvic inflammatory disease or unexplained persistent vaginal discharge, or post-coital bleeding. Fewer favoured testing patients with proctitis and support was divided for routinely testing Chlamydia-positive patients. Testing of current sexual contacts of MG-positive patients was supported, as was a test of cure for MG-positive patients, although agreement fell below the 75% threshold. Respondents agreed that all consultant- or specialist-led services should have access to testing for MG (98.3%). There was strong agreement for having MG-testing available for specific patient groups, which may reflect concern over antibiotic resistance and the desire to comply with clinical guidelines that recommend MG-testing in sexual health clinic settings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reena Sidhu ◽  
David Turnbull ◽  
Mary Newton ◽  
Siwan Thomas-Gibson ◽  
David S Sanders ◽  
...  

In the UK, more than 2.5 million endoscopic procedures are carried out each year. Most are performed under conscious sedation with benzodiazepines and opioids administered by the endoscopist. However, in prolonged and complex procedures, this form of sedation may provide inadequate patient comfort or result in oversedation. As a result, this may have a negative impact on procedural success and patient outcome. In addition, there have been safety concerns on the high doses of benzodiazepines and opioids used particularly in prolonged and complex procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy has evolved rapidly over the past 5 years with advances in technical skills and equipment allowing interventions and procedural capabilities that are moving closer to minimally invasive endoscopic surgery. It is vital that safe and appropriate sedation practices follow the inevitable expansion of this portfolio to accommodate safe and high-quality clinical outcomes. This position statement outlines the current use of sedation in the UK and highlights the role for anaesthetist-led deep sedation practice with a focus on propofol sedation although the choice of sedative or anaesthetic agent is ultimately the choice of the anaesthetist. It outlines the indication for deep sedation and anaesthesia, patient selection and assessment and procedural details. It considers the setup for a deep sedation and anaesthesia list, including the equipment required, the environment, staffing and monitoring requirements. Considerations for different endoscopic procedures in both emergency and elective setting are also detailed. The role for training, audit, compliance and future developments are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 1483-1494.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin Wani ◽  
Rajesh N. Keswani ◽  
Samuel Han ◽  
Eva M. Aagaard ◽  
Matthew Hall ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujata Biswas ◽  
Laith Alrubaiy ◽  
Louise China ◽  
Melanie Lockett ◽  
Antony Ellis ◽  
...  

BackgroundImprovements in the structure of endoscopy training programmes resulting in certification from the Joint Advisory Group in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have been acknowledged to improve training experience and contribute to enhanced colonoscopy performance.ObjectivesThe 2016 British Society of Gastroenterology trainees’ survey of endoscopy training explored the delivery of endoscopy training - access to lists; level of supervision and trainee’s progression through diagnostic, core therapy and subspecialty training. In addition, the barriers to endoscopy training progress and utility of training tools were examined.MethodsA web-based survey (Survey Monkey) was sent to all higher specialty gastroenterology trainees.ResultsThere were some improvements in relation to earlier surveys; 85% of trainees were satisfied with the level of supervision of their training. But there were ongoing problems; 12.5% of trainees had no access to a regular training list, and 53% of final year trainees had yet to achieve full certification in colonoscopy. 9% of final year trainees did not feel confident in endoscopic management of upper GI bleeds.ConclusionsThe survey findings provide a challenge to those agencies tasked with supporting endoscopy training in the UK. Acknowledging the findings of the survey, the paper provides a strategic response with reference to increased service pressures, reduced overall training time in specialty training programmes and the requirement to support general medical and surgical on-call commitments. It describes the steps required to improve training on the ground: delivering additional training tools and learning resources, and introducing certification standards for therapeutic modalities in parallel with goals for improving the quality of endoscopy in the UK.


2020 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2020-101701
Author(s):  
Shiran Esmaily ◽  
Chia Chuin Yau ◽  
Deepak Dwarakanath ◽  
John Hancock ◽  
Vikramjit Mitra

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected endoscopy services including pancreatobiliary (PB) endoscopy across the UK. The British Society of Gastroenterology and Joint Advisory Group have issued guidance for managing endoscopy services safely throughout this period. There have been perceived concerns among the PB endoscopists that wearing full personal protective equipment might have an adverse impact on key performance indicators (KPIs) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures leading to non-compliance with the national guidelines. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on KPIs in ERCP and EUS and ascertain the risk of procedure-related complications.MethodsA retrospective audit of a prospectively maintained endoscopy database was carried out between 18 March and 31 July 2020.Results146 ERCP procedures (common bile duct (CBD) cannulation rate of naïve papilla 89.2%, complete CBD stone extraction rate at first ERCP 88.2%, biliary stricture decompression rate 91%) and 87 EUS procedures (diagnostic accuracy of EUS-fine needle aspiration 92%) were carried out during this period. ERCP-related complications included pancreatitis (4.8%), bleeding (0.68%) and cholangitis (0.68%). 30-day ERCP procedure-related mortality was 0.68%. There were no complications or procedure-related mortality in the EUS group.ConclusionThis is the first study looking at the impact of COVID-19 on KPIs and procedure-related complications in ERCP and EUS in the literature. Our study confirms that a high-quality PB endoscopy service can be delivered safely and effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 1920-1941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin H Mullish ◽  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Jonathan P Segal ◽  
Victoria L McCune ◽  
Melissa Baxter ◽  
...  

Interest in the therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been increasing globally in recent years, particularly as a result of randomised studies in which it has been used as an intervention. The main focus of these studies has been the treatment of recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but there is also an emerging evidence base regarding potential applications in non-CDI settings. The key clinical stakeholders for the provision and governance of FMT services in the UK have tended to be in two major specialty areas: gastroenterology and microbiology/infectious diseases. While the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance (2014) for use of FMT for recurrent or refractory CDI has become accepted in the UK, clear evidence-based UK guidelines for FMT have been lacking. This resulted in discussions between the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS), and a joint BSG/HIS FMT working group was established. This guideline document is the culmination of that joint dialogue.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3655-3655
Author(s):  
Paul Telfer ◽  
Banu Kaya ◽  
Dimitris A. Tsitsikas ◽  
Filipa Barroso ◽  
Cynthia Sangarappillai

Abstract Background: There is a lack of data to estimate current life expectancy in adults who have had continual access to best standard of care since birth. Furthermore, the effect of disease-modifying treatments on survival has not been adequately evaluated. Data from the East London Newborn Cohort Study provide information on these outcomes in the setting of the UK National Health Service. Methods: Inclusion criteria were birth in the London boroughs of Hackney and Tower Hamlets, diagnosis by newborn screening (local programme from 1983 to 2004, and national programme from 2004 onwards), referred and seen at least once in this specialist referral centre. Permission to study all patients in the cohort without individual consent was obtained from the UK National Confidentiality Advisory Group and National Research Ethics Committee. Inclusion was verified by checking against births recorded in national newborn screening dataset. Current status was obtained from hospital records, and for patients no longer attending this service, by contacting their current clinical team, general practitioner and the National Haemoglobinopathy Registry. Survival and factors associated with survival were analysed using Kaplan Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards methods. Subjects were followed from birth to 31st December 2017. Results: 404 subjects have been enrolled. The median age of surviving patients was 15 (IQ range 9-22) yrs. 202 (50.0%) were female. 177 (43.8%) were being followed in this paediatric service, 98 (24.3%) in this adult service, 40 (9.9%) in other paediatric services, 52 (12.9%) in other adult services; 5 (1.2%) cured with bone marrow transplant, 6 (1.5%) known to be alive but not under active follow-up and 16 (4.0%) lost to follow-up for more than 2 years. Genotypes (%) were HbSS 271 (67.1), HbSC 113 (28.0), HbS beta0 3 (0.7), HbS beta+ 16(4.0), HbSE 1 (0.3). Total years of follow up were 6165.9 (HbSS 4288.8; HbSC 1594.3; other genotypes 282.9). 10 patients (2.5%) have died, as a result of pneumococcal meningitis (2 cases, age 8 and 9 yrs., both HbSS), acute chest syndrome (2 cases, 6 and 19 yrs., both HbSS), acute fat embolism syndrome (1 case, 25 yrs., HbSC), acute R heart failure (1 case, 28 yrs., HbSC), cerebral haemorrhage (1 case, 22 yrs., HbSS), sudden death cause unknown (1 case, 21 yrs., HbSS), recurrent stroke with chronic complications (2 cases, 20 and 25 yrs, both HbSS). In those who died, the median age of death was 22 yrs. The overall mortality rate for HbSS was 1.9 per 1000 patient yrs, (95% CI 0.9 - 5.0). In follow-up to 20 yrs. of age, and after 20 yrs. of age, it was respectively 1.1 per 1000 patient yrs (95% CI 1-5) and 7.9 (CI 4-25). Overall mortality rate for HbSC was 1.8 per 1000 patient yrs. ( 95% CI 0-5.0). In follow-up to 20 yrs. of age and after 20 yrs. of age it was respectively zero and 11.4 (CI 7-48). The estimated survival (ES) for HbSS at 10 yrs. was 98.6% +/- 0.1 SE and at 25yrs 92.9 % +/- 2.9(SE). For HbSC at age 10 and 25 years ES was 100% (Figure 1). 51 (18.8%) patients with HbSS, and 1 (0.9%) with HbSC have been treated with hydroxyurea (HU) for >6 months for a total of 812.1 patient yrs. on therapy. The median age (IQ range) at start of HU was 16 yrs. (IQ range 11-19). 57 (21.0%) patients with HbSS and 1 (0.9%) with Hb beta+ have been managed with chronic transfusion for >6 months, for a total of 1149.6 patient yrs. on therapy. The median age (IQ range) at start of transfusion was 10 (16-24) yrs. 1 patient (1.9%) died while on HU and 4 (6.9%) while receiving transfusion. Survival modelling, which included treatment as a time dependent covariate, showed that neither genotype, gender, HU or transfusion treatment was associated with better survival. Conclusions: The study is the first to evaluate survival in a newborn cohort past the age of 20 years. We have confirmed a low mortality rate in childhood, but increased number of deaths in young adults including those with HbSC. This study provides evidence of the benefit of newborn screening and comprehensive care which is accessible at all ages, free of charge. The uptake of HU, particularly at a young age, has been low and a positive effect of HU on survival as described in other studies has not yet been observed in this cohort. Earlier initiation of disease-modifying treatment and longer-term follow-up will be required to provide evidence of treatment effects of HU and other therapies on survival. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Telfer: Bluebird Bio: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ApoPharma Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Terumo: Honoraria. Kaya:Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; British Society For Haematology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (Sup8) ◽  
pp. S10-S16
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ratcliffe ◽  
Anirudh P Bhandare ◽  
Shanil Kadir

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatoscopy (ERCP) is a technical and complex procedure requiring highly skilled and trained endoscopists and assistants. Literature so far has highlighted a need for better training for assistants of ERCP, as well as linking the volumes of procedures performed to improved success rates and reduced complication rates. Methods: A survey was undertaken of 51 ERCP nurse assistants' experience of training in ERCP from district general, teaching and tertiary hospitals in the UK. Nursing assistants are registered nurses with endoscopy skills or nursing practitioners of band 4 and above with experience in ERCP. Findings: Of those surveyed, 93% had undertaken fewer than 50 procedures supervised by experienced nurse assistants prior to being deemed competent, with 63% having performed fewer than 25 procedures. Only 40% felt confident at independently assisting. Attending formal training had little impact on this, but did improve confidence in out-of-hours work. Participants' main suggestions for training were a course involving familiarisation with equipment, close supervision and anatomy training. Conclusions: There is a lack of guidance on the correct training and experience required for nurse assistants. This survey's findings suggest many are commencing independent practice feeling underprepared. More work needs to be done to improve the quality of nurse training and support their learning, and further studies are needed to look into the impact this has on patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document