Dispensation Patterns of Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Routine Data Analysis of Insurance Claims in Germany

Author(s):  
Brenda Bongaerts ◽  
Bianca Kollhorst ◽  
Oliver Kuss ◽  
Iris Pigeot ◽  
Wolfgang Rathmann

Abstract Aims To describe dispensation patterns of glucose-lowering drugs in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Germany. Materials and methods Based on claims data from four statutory health insurances (German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database,>25 million insurants), all individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified. Eligible patients had a first diagnosis for type 2 diabetes between January 2012 and December 2016. We analyzed the dispensation patterns of first-line glucose-lowering therapies initiated in the year after diabetes diagnosis and patterns of second-line therapies dispensed one year after first-line treatment. Results A total of 356,647 individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were included (average age [SD]: 63.5 [13.4] years; 49.3% males). Of the 31.6% of individuals who were pharmacologically treated in the year after diagnosis, metformin monotherapy was most frequently dispensed (73.1%), followed by dual therapy of metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) (6.4%), and monotherapy with DPP-4is (2.9%). From 2012 through 2016, sulfonylurea dispensations were reduced by more than 50%. Dispensations for combination therapies with DPP-4is increased up to 10.6%. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors contributed to 2% of all treatments. After a median of 5 months, 20.0% of individuals on pharmacological therapy initiated second-line glucose-lowering treatment. Conclusions Data from German statutory health insurances (2012 to 2016) showed that most individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were dispensed metformin monotherapy in line with diabetes care guidelines. A substantial decrease in the use of sulfonylureas was observed after the introduction of DPP-4i and GLP-1 receptor agonists.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e034613
Author(s):  
Kamlesh Khunti ◽  
Marilia B Gomes ◽  
Mikhail Kosiborod ◽  
Antonio Nicolucci ◽  
Stuart Pocock ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the extent to which patients with type 2 diabetes discontinue metformin therapy when initiating second-line treatment and factors associated with metformin discontinuation, using baseline data from the DISCOVER study programme.DesignDISCOVER is a 3-year, prospective, observational study programme including data from 38 countries across 6 continents from 2014 to 2019.SettingPrimary and secondary healthcare centres, hospitals and specialist diabetes centres in both urban and rural locations.ParticipantsA total of 15 992 patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe proportion of patients who discontinued metformin as a second-line therapy and the factors associated with this treatment change.ResultsOf the 14 668 patients (from 37 countries) with valid treatment data, 11 837 (80.7%) received metformin as first-line glucose-lowering therapy; 8488 (71.7%) received metformin monotherapy and 3349 (28.3%) received metformin as part of a combination therapy. Overall, treatment with metformin was discontinued in 15.1% (1782) of patients who received first-line metformin (14.1% (1194) and 17.6% (588) in those who received metformin as monotherapy and as part of a combination, respectively); this proportion varied across regions from 6.9% (54) in Africa to 20.6% (628) in South-East Asia. On metformin discontinuation, 73.6% (1311) of patients received a non-insulin monotherapy at second line. Factors associated with an increased odds of metformin discontinuation were older age (≥75 years) and having a history of chronic kidney disease. The probability of metformin monotherapy discontinuation was lower in patients from Africa than in those from Europe.ConclusionsA substantial number of patients discontinued taking metformin when beginning second-line therapy. Most of these patients subsequently received a non-insulin monotherapy at second line, in contradiction to international guidelines and potentially leaving them at an increased risk of hyperglycaemia and associated adverse outcomes.Trial registration numbersNCT02322762 and NCT02226822.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Palladino ◽  
A G Tabak ◽  
K Khunti ◽  
J Valabhji ◽  
A Majeed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The benefit of screening for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) is still debated. Furthermore, the associated risk of vascular complications following a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in people previously detected as NDH in real-world settings is not known. We examined the presence of vascular disease in newly diagnosed T2D individuals by glycaemic status within 3 years of diagnosis. Methods We identified 159,736 individuals diagnosed with T2D from the Clinical Practice Research Database in England between 2004 and 2017. We used logistic regression models to compare presence of microvascular (retinopathy and nephropathy) and macrovascular (coronary artery events, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial disease) disease at the time of T2D diagnosis by prior glycaemic status. Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, smoking status, blood pressure, cholesterol, and number of primary care visits. Results There was a strong association between baseline glycaemic status and presence of microvascular complications at diabetes diagnosis (normoglycaemia 30.7%, no glycaemic test 36.7%, NDH 42.4%). Similarly, prevalence of macrovascular disease was lower for those with normoglycaemia(26.9%) compared with NDH(29.8%). Compared with individuals with normoglycaemia, those detected with NDH before the diagnosis of T2D had 76% and 53% increased odds of retinopathy and any microvascular complications (AOR 1.76, 95%CI 1.69-1.85; AOR 1.53, 95%CI 1.41-1.65), and 7% higher odds of diagnosis of acute coronary events (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.03-1.12) at time of diagnosis of T2D. Conclusions Microvascular and macrovascular diseases are detected in 40 and 20% of newly diagnosed T2D. NDH before the diagnosis of T2D was more likely associated with microvascular complications and acute coronary events. Detection of NDH might represent opportunities for reducing the burden of microvascular disease through heightened attention to screening for microvascular complications. Key messages Detection of non-diabetic hyperglycaemia before the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes was more likely associated with microvascular complications and acute coronary events. Detection of non-diabetic hyperglycaemia might represent opportunities for reducing the burden of microvascular disease through heightened attention to screening for microvascular complications.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc202926
Author(s):  
HoJin Shin ◽  
Sebastian Schneeweiss ◽  
Robert J. Glynn ◽  
Elisabetta Patorno

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 977-P
Author(s):  
HOJIN SHIN ◽  
SEBASTIAN SCHNEEWEISS ◽  
ROBERT GLYNN ◽  
ELISABETTA PATORNO

2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (07) ◽  
pp. 419-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Leiter ◽  
Michael Nauck

AbstractFor patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) generally exert robust glucose-lowering effects that are at least as effective as insulin. As monotherapies, changes from baseline in HbA1c with GLP-1RAs ranged from –1.9 to –0.7% in phase 3 trials. In addition, GLP-1RAs confer a low risk of hypoglycaemia and have a body-weight advantage (changes from baseline ranging from –4.0 to –0.4 kg). There is also evidence of significant reductions in risk for cardiovascular events with some of these agents, with a number of other trials underway. Gastrointestinal adverse events typically increase with GLP-1RAs, although these are generally mild to moderate in intensity and rarely require treatment discontinuation. The GLP-1RAs that are commercially available or in development vary in structure and pharmacokinetics. These differences affect the frequency of administration and can also affect their relative efficacy and safety. This review summarizes the findings of phase 3 glycaemic control trials of available GLP-1RAs and considers them in the context of the distinct clinical needs of individual patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document