An Open-Label, Rater-Blinded, 8-Week Trial of Bupropion Hydrochloride Extended-Release in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder with Atypical Features

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (06) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-J. Seo ◽  
B. Lee ◽  
J.-H. Seok ◽  
H. Jeon ◽  
J.-W. Paik ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1289-1289
Author(s):  
M. Van Noord ◽  
G. Gartlehner ◽  
R. Hansen ◽  
L. Morgan ◽  
K. Thaler ◽  
...  

IntroductionExtended-release formulations of antidepressants have been marketed as a strategy to increase patient adherence. Changes in the formulation of drugs, however, could be related to changes in efficacy and tolerability. Among second-generation antidepressants, bupropion, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine are available in immediate- and extended-release formulations.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of immediate- versus extended-release formulations of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults.AimTo provide an evidence base for clinicians when choosing immediate- or extended-release formulations of antidepressants for the treatment of MDD.MethodsWe conducted a comparative effectiveness review for the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality searching PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts up to May 2010. Two people independently reviewed the literature, abstracted data, and rated the risk of bias.ResultsSix RCTs and one observational study provided evidence about the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of bupropion SR (sustained release) versus bupropion XL (extended release), fluoxetine daily vs. fluoxetine weekly, paroxetine IR (immediate release) versus paroxetine CR (continuous release), and venlafaxine IR versus venlafaxine XR (extended release). Overall, no substantial differences in efficacy and safety could be detected. Open-label and observational evidence indicated better adherence for bupropion XL and fluoxetine weekly than for immediate-release medications. No differences in adherence could be detected between paroxetine IR and paroxetine CR.ConclusionsOur findings indicate similar efficacy and tolerability between immediate- and extended-release formulations. Whether extended-release formulations lead to better adherence remains unclear.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 796-803
Author(s):  
Cheolmin Shin ◽  
Young-Hoon Ko ◽  
Se-Hoon Shim ◽  
Ji Sun Kim ◽  
Kyoung-Sae Na ◽  
...  

Objective This study investigated the treatment response and cognitive enhancement effects of buspirone augmentation of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), according to atypical feature subtypes of MDD.Methods An 8 week, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label study was conducted. The Columbia Atypical Depression Diagnostic Scale was administered to evaluate atypical features. Patients were assigned randomly to the buspirone augmentation or non-buspirone groups. Symptom severity and cognitive function were evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, digit span test, word fluency test, and Trail Making Tests A and B.Results A total of 89 patients were recruited. There were no significant differences in the measures between the groups; however, among the MDD patients without atypical features, the digit span and word fluency tests were improved by treatment. In the MDD patients without atypical features, the buspirone augmentation group showed a significant improvement on the digit span test compared to the non-buspirone group.Conclusion Buspirone augmentation did not demonstrate significant benefits in MDD patients; however, buspirone augmentation showed greater efficacy for the improvement of cognitive function in MDD patients without atypical features. Our study suggests that atypical features are an important factor for cognitive enhancement in buspirone augmentation treatment in patients with MDD.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Emslie ◽  
Paul P. Yeung ◽  
Nadia R. Kunz

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Because major depressive disorder (MDD) is often chronic and recurrent, even pediatric patients who are treated successfully during an acute episode may need longer-term treatment. Yet, data on long-term treatment with antidepressants in pediatric MDD are limited.Objective: To evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with venlafaxine extended-release (ER) in children and adolescents with MDD.Methods: Subjects (n=86) 7–17 years of age with MDD entered a multicenter, open-label study of flexible-dose venlafaxine ER for 6 weeks of acute treatment, followed by continuation treatment for up to 6 months total treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score (intent-to-treat population).Results: Mean CDRS-R total score decreased from 60.1±10.0 at baseline to 36.3±13.1 at week 6, and to 33.8±15.0 at 6 months (last observation carried forward). Among completers (n=36), the mean CDRS-R total score was 24.3±7.6 at the end of 6 months of treatment. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (53%), nausea (26%), infection (24%), abdominal pain (22%), vomiting (21%), and pharyngitis (19%). Fifteen (17%) participants discontinued due to adverse events, 9 of whom did so within the first 6 weeks. Serious adverse events (suicide attempt [two], hostility [two], hallucinations, depression, and pharyngitis) occurred in seven patients. There were no suicides.Conclusion: Most improvement with venlafaxine ER occurs during the first 6 weeks of treatment. Prescribers should be alert to signs of suicidal ideation and hostility in pediatric patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. S161
Author(s):  
Andrew Cutler ◽  
Scott T. Aaronson ◽  
Gregory W. Mattingly ◽  
Samuel T. Wilkinson ◽  
Robert Lasser ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document