Learning curve for hysterectomy in a high-volume-hospital after implementation of endoscopic procedure

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mavrova ◽  
JC Radosa ◽  
D Bardens ◽  
K Neis ◽  
S Wagenpfeil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Endoscopic Procedure ◽  
High Volume Hospital

Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Braga ◽  
Cristina Ridolfi ◽  
Gianpaolo Balzano ◽  
Renato Castoldi ◽  
Nicolò Pecorelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
High Volume Hospital

scholarly journals Correction to: Laparoscopic‑assisted ERCP following RYGB: a 12‑year assessment of outcomes and learning curve at a high‑volume pancreatobiliary center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer AlMasri ◽  
Mazen S. Zenati ◽  
Georgios I. Papachristou ◽  
Adam Slivka ◽  
Michael Sanders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

scholarly journals Open Versus Endoscopic Osteotomy of Posterosuperior Calcaneal Tuberosity for Haglund Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712110010
Author(s):  
Yanbin Pi ◽  
Yuelin Hu ◽  
Qinwei Guo ◽  
Dong Jiang ◽  
Xin Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Procedure ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Although endoscopic calcaneoplasty and retrocalcaneal debridement have been extensively applied to treat Haglund syndrome, evidence of the value of the endoscopic procedure remains to be fully established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes and the amount of osteotomy between open and endoscopic surgery for the treatment of Haglund syndrome. It was hypothesized that endoscopic calcaneoplasty would lead to higher patient satisfaction and lower complication rates compared with open surgical techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The following postoperative outcomes were compared between the open surgery group (n = 20) and the endoscopic surgery group (n = 27): visual analog scale for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index, Tegner score, Ankle Activity Score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; postoperative complications; and duration of surgery. To determine the extent of resection, the authors compared the calcaneal height ratio, calcaneal resection ratio, calcaneal resection angle, pitch line, and Haglund deformity height between groups. The learning curve for endoscopic calcaneoplasty was also calculated. Results: There were no significant differences between the open and endoscopic groups on any outcome score. Two patients in the open group reported temporary paresthesia around the incisional site, indicating sural nerve injuries; no complication was reported in the endoscopy group. None of the parameters for extent of resection were statistically significant between the groups. The duration of surgery was 44.90 ± 10.52 and 65.39 ± 11.12 minutes in the open and endoscopy groups, respectively ( P = .001). Regarding the learning curve for endoscopic calcaneoplasty (6 surgeons; 27 follow-up patients; 9 patients lost to follow-up), the duration of surgery reached a steady point of 55.68 ± 4.19 minutes after the fourth operation. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the endoscopy procedure was as effective as the open procedure. The endoscopic procedure required significantly more time than the open procedure, and the duration of the endoscopic procedure was shortened only after the fourth operation, suggesting that it requires high technical skills and familiarity with the anatomic relationships.

What Constitutes a “High-Volume” Hospital for Pancreatic Resection?

2008 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 622.e1-622.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Meguid ◽  
Nita Ahuja ◽  
David C. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
High Volume ◽  
High Volume Hospital

Primary Uterine Cancer in Maryland: Impact of Distance on Access to Surgical Care at High-Volume Hospitals

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1244-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille C. Gunderson ◽  
Ana I. Tergas ◽  
Aimee C. Fleury ◽  
Teresa P. Diaz-Montes ◽  
Robert L. Giuntoli
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
High Volume ◽  
High Volume Hospital ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Zip Code

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of distance on access to high-volume surgical treatment for patients with uterine cancer in Maryland.MethodsThe Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was retrospectively searched to identify primary uterine cancer surgical cases from 1994 to 2010. Race, type of insurance, year of surgery, community setting, and both surgeon and hospital volume were collected. Geographical coordinates of hospital and patient’s zip code were used to calculate primary independent outcomes of distance traveled and distance from nearest high-volume hospital (HVH). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and confidence intervals.ResultsFrom 1994 to 2010, 8529 women underwent primary surgical management of uterine cancer in Maryland. Multivariable analysis demonstrated white race, rural residence, surgery by a high-volume surgeon and surgery from 2003 to 2010 to be associated with both travel 50 miles or more to the treating hospital and residence 50 miles or more from the nearest HVH (allP< 0.05). Patients who travel 50 miles or more to the treating hospital are more likely to have surgery at a HVH (odds ratio, 6.03; 95% confidence interval, 4.67–7.79) In contrast, patients, who reside ≥50 miles from a HVH, are less likely to have their surgery at an HVH. (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–0.42).ConclusionIn Maryland, 50 miles or more from residence to the nearest HVH is a barrier to high-volume care. However, patients who travel 50 miles or more seem to do so to receive care by a high-volume surgeon at an HVH. In Maryland, Nonwhites are more likely to live closer to an HVH and more likely to use these services.

340 Trends and Disparities in Cervical Spine Fusion Procedure Utilization in the New York State

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 276-276
Author(s):  
Rui Feng ◽  
Mark Finkelstein ◽  
Eric Karl Oermann ◽  
Michael Palese ◽  
John M Caridi
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
African American ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
New York State ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Spine Fusion ◽  
York State ◽  
High Volume Hospital ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Cervical Spine Fusion

Abstract INTRODUCTION There has been a steady increase in spinal fusion procedures performed each year in the US, especially cervical and lumbar fusion. Our study aims to analyze the rate of increase at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient populations at these three volume categories. METHODS We searched the New York State, Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database from 2005 to 2014 for the ICD-9-CM Procedure Codes 81.01 (Fusion, atlas-axis), 81.02 (Fusion, anterior column, other cervical, anterior technique), and 81.03 (Fusion, posterior column, other cervical, posterior technique). Patients' primary diagnosis (ICD-9-CM), age, race/ethnicity, primary payment method, severity of illness, length of stay, hospital of operation were included. We categorized all 122 hospitals high-, medium-, and low-volume. We then described the trends in annual number of cervical spine fusion surgeries in each of the three hospital volume groups using descriptive statistics. RESULTS >African American patients were significantly greater portion of patients receiving care at low-volume hospitals, 15.1% versus 11.6% at high-volume hospital. Medicaid and self-pay patients were also overrepresented at low-volume centers, 6.7% and 3.9% versus 2.6% and 1.7% respectively at high-volume centers. In addition, Compared with Caucasian patients, African American patients had higher rates of post-operative infection (P = 0.0020) and post-operative bleeding (P = 0.0044). Compared with privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had a higher rate of post-operative bleeding (P = 0.0266) and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.0031). CONCLUSION Our results showed significant differences in racial distribution and primary payments methods between the low- and high-volume categories, and suggests that accessibility to care at high-volume centers remains problematic for these disadvantaged populations.

scholarly journals Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Giudicelli ◽  
Michele Diana ◽  
Mickael Chevallay ◽  
Benjamin Blaser ◽  
Chloé Darbellay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Bariatric Surgeon ◽  
Senior Surgeon ◽  
Surgical Learning

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document