Risk of venous thromboembolism in relatives of symptomatic probands with thrombophilia: a systematic review

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (07) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Langlois ◽  
Philip Wells

SummaryClinical equipoise exists regarding whether relatives of individuals with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia should be screened for thrombophilia. There have been no systematic attempts to summarize studies that have assessed the incidence of VTE in relatives. The purpose of this review was to systematically identify and review observational studies with thrombophilic relatives and to summarize their findings with respect to their risk of VTE.We conducted a systematic literature review and included nine observational studies meeting a priori inclusion criteria. Potentially eligible studies evaluated VTE incidence in relatives of index patients (probands) with symptomatic thrombophilia. In the four prospective studies, the incidence of VTE for asymptomatic family members with factor V Leiden ranged from 0.58-0.67% per year, 1.0-2.5% for protein C deficiency, 0.7-2.2% for protein S deficiency, and 4% for antithrombin deficiency. About half of all VTEs occurred during well-known risk periods but incidence rates were decreased by use of prophylaxis. No deaths from pulmonary embolism or fatal hemorrhages from anticoagulants were reported. The incidence of VTE was generally lower in the retrospective studies. The pooled relative risk from four retrospective studies for factor V Leiden carriers was 3.69 (CI 2.27, 6.00) and from two studies the pooled relative risk for deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin was 10.58 (CI 5.38, 20.81).In conclusion, the risk of VTE events in asymptomatic relatives is low, but this may be an underestimate. Anticoagulant prophylaxis during risk periods appears to be of benefit but further research in this area is required.

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (06) ◽  
pp. 1426-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Makris ◽  
F E Preston ◽  
N J Beauchamp ◽  
P C Cooper ◽  
M E Daly ◽  
...  

SummaryThe presence of the 20210A allele of the prothrombin (PT) gene has recently been shown to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. This is probably mediated through increased plasma prothrombin levels. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of the prothrombin 20210A allele in control subjects and in subjects with recognised thrombophilia and to establish whether the additional inheritance of the PT 20210A allele is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. 101 subjects with a history of venous thromboembolism and diagnosed as having either factor V Leiden (R506Q) or heritable deficiencies of protein C, protein S or antithrombin were studied. The prevalence of the PT 20210A allele in this group was compared with the results obtained for 150 control subjects. In addition, the relationships were examined between genetic status and the number of documented thromboembolic episodes, and between plasma prothrombin levels and possession of the PT 20210A allele. 8 (7.9%) of the 101 patients were also heterozygous for the PT 20210A allele. This compares with 0.7% in the control subjects (p = 0.005). After exclusion of patients on warfarin, the mean plasma prothrombin of 113 subjects without 20210A was 1.09 U/ml, as compared with 1.32 U/ml in 8 with the allele (p = 0.0002). Among the 101 patients with either factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency, protein C deficiency or antithrombin deficiency, the age adjusted mean (SD) number of venous thromboembolic episodes at diagnosis was 3.7 (1.5) in those with the PT 20210A allele, as compared with 1.9 (1.1) in those without (p = 0.0001). We have demonstrated that the prevalence of the PT 20210A allele is significantly greater in subjects with venous thrombosis and characterised heritable thrombophilia than in normal control subjects and that the additional inheritance of PT 20210A is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We have also confirmed that plasma prothrombin levels are significantly greater in subjects possessing the PT 20210A compared with those who do not.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Maria Khan ◽  
Chaudhry Altaf ◽  
Hamid Saeed Malik ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Naeem ◽  
Aamna Latif

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is referred to as formation of clots in a deep vein or lodging of thrombus towards the lungs which could be fatal yet preventable. The risk of developing VTE can be increased by various factors. Where there are innumerable acquired causes, the possibility of inherited thrombophilia cannot be ignored. In view of this, we have evaluated all patients with venous thromboembolism for inherited thrombophilia. Objective. To evaluate the frequencies of antithrombin (AT) deficiency, protein C and S deficiencies, Factor V Leiden, and prothrombin gene mutations in patients harboring venous thromboembolism. Materials and Methods. A study comprising of 880 patients who were presented with manifestations of venous thromboembolism was conducted from July 2016 to June 2017. A blood sample collected from patients was screened for thrombophilia defects encompassing AT, protein C and S deficiencies, Factor V Leiden, and prothrombin gene mutations. All acquired causes of thrombosis were excluded. Results. Of 880 patients who underwent screening for thrombophilia, 182 patients demonstrated VTE history. Their age ranged from 1 to 58 years. Males constituted a predominant group. About 45 (24.7%) patients had evidence of heritable thrombophilia. Of these, 20 (10.9%) had AT deficiency, 9 (4.9%) had Factor V Leiden mutation, 6 (3.2%) had protein C deficiency, whereas protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation both were found in 5 (2.7%) patients. Conclusion. Our study illustrated the highest frequency of antithrombin deficiency among other investigated thrombophilia defects.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanny Al-Samkari ◽  
Nathan T. Connell

Thrombosis is common in clinical practice. Venous thromboembolism in particular raises questions of a possible underlying hereditary or acquired thrombophilic state. Despite considerable data describing the impact of various thrombophilic states on risks of initial and recurrent thromboembolic events, thrombophilia testing is not standardized. An understanding of the utility and pitfalls of clinical thrombophilia testing is necessary to employ this testing properly. When utilized appropriately, thrombophilia testing can be vital in informing an individual patient’s thrombosis risk and pursuing optimal anticoagulant management. Hereditary thrombophilia testing involves investigation for factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G202010A gene mutation, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Assessment for acquired thrombophilias is perhaps even more important, recognizing the possibility for myeloproliferative neoplasms, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, occult malignancy and other important acquired thrombotic predispositions. Timing of thrombophilia testing in relation to anticoagulation, acute thrombosis, and use of hormonal agents or pregnancy is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis. This review describes each of the most important hereditary and acquired thrombophilias, explains their relationship to venous and arterial thrombosis, delineates evidence-based indications for thrombophilia testing, identifies potential testing pitfalls, and synthesizes the key points in outlining algorithms for thrombophilia testing in clinical practice. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 48 references. Key words: thrombophilia, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hypercoagulability of malignancy


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanny Al-Samkari ◽  
Nathan T. Connell

Thrombosis is common in clinical practice. Venous thromboembolism in particular raises questions of a possible underlying hereditary or acquired thrombophilic state. Despite considerable data describing the impact of various thrombophilic states on risks of initial and recurrent thromboembolic events, thrombophilia testing is not standardized. An understanding of the utility and pitfalls of clinical thrombophilia testing is necessary to employ this testing properly. When utilized appropriately, thrombophilia testing can be vital in informing an individual patient’s thrombosis risk and pursuing optimal anticoagulant management. Hereditary thrombophilia testing involves investigation for factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G202010A gene mutation, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Assessment for acquired thrombophilias is perhaps even more important, recognizing the possibility for myeloproliferative neoplasms, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, occult malignancy and other important acquired thrombotic predispositions. Timing of thrombophilia testing in relation to anticoagulation, acute thrombosis, and use of hormonal agents or pregnancy is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis. This review describes each of the most important hereditary and acquired thrombophilias, explains their relationship to venous and arterial thrombosis, delineates evidence-based indications for thrombophilia testing, identifies potential testing pitfalls, and synthesizes the key points in outlining algorithms for thrombophilia testing in clinical practice. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 48 references. Key words: thrombophilia, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hypercoagulability of malignancy


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Cacciapuoti

: Dear Editor, Thrombophilia is the tendency to form blood clots both in arteries and veins [1]. Inherited and acquired high plasma homocysteine (HHcy) levels are judged as thrombophilic agents because can induce both arterial and venous thrombosis [2-5]. But, the association of hHHcy with Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) has been studied less extensively than that with arterial thrombosis. Some causes are responsible for this, such as Endothelial Dysfunction (ED). Several mechanisms have been suggested explaining HHcy-induced ED. Among these are included: nitric oxide (NO) inhibition due to the suppression of NO. The inhibition is caused by Asymmetric-D-Methyl-Arginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). ED is also dependent on the endothelin-1 induction, angiotensin II activation and oxidative stress [6]. Other factors involved in the induction of arterial thrombosis are: impaired DNA methylation, vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation, and platelet’s activation [7]. On the contrary, a direct correlation between HHcy and venous thrombosis is substantially less known [8]. In this context, some AA. Reports show that HHcy promotes venous thrombosis by disturbing the procoagulant-anticoagulant balance [9]. But, a significant increase of VTE risk also happens in patients contemporary suffering of inherited HHcy and factor V Leiden gene mutation. In addition, venous thrombosis can be evident when HHcy is present in association with other thrombophilic factors, such as prothrombin G 20210A, protein C deficiency, protein C deficiency or antithrombin deficiency [10]. On view of these evidences, to prevent both arterial and venous thrombosis in HHcy-patients, an antiplatelet drug should be added to an anticoagulant compound. The combination of two antithrombotics seems to be effective to antagonize the risk of arterial and venous thrombi formation, even if this treatment increases the risk of major bleeding [11]. Antiplatelet therapy should consist of Aspirin or Clopidogrel, whereas anticoagulant treatment will require an acecumarol. But, conventional anticoagulants, such as acecumarol, also called Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs), have multiple negative effects as: delayed onset of action, need to coagulation monitoring performed through the evaluation of International Normalized Ratio (INR), frequent dosage adjustments and numerous drugs and foods interaction [12]. Thus, a combination of an antiplatelet drug with a DOAC should be used in HHcy-patients. Specifically, likewise to the Cardiovascular OutcomMes for People uSing Anticoagulation StrategieS (COMPASS) Study [13], Aspirin or Clopidogrel at full dosage + half dose of a DOAC could be administered. The choice of DOACs, as above referred, added to an antiplatelet treatment can be associated with risk of major bleeding. For this reason, DOAC should be given at reduced dose. Conclusively, HHcy is certainly associated with atherosclerosis, while its association with venous thrombosis is controversial. On the contrary, its presence in association with factor V Leiden and/or other coagulative factors could likely increase VTE [14]. In that case, the association of an antiplatelet drug with reduced doses of DOAC seems to be an attractive and rational treatment to antagonize both arterial and venous thromboembolism induced by HHcy. Interestedly, the supplementation with water soluble vitamins (folate, Vit. B6, Vit. B12) reducing the high Hcy levels, can also decrease the severity of HHcy-related thrombophilia [4, 15].


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (02) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gerhardt ◽  
Cornelis Kluft ◽  
Rüdiger Scharf ◽  
Rainer Zotz

SummaryWomen who are using oral contraceptives can acquire APC resistance, measured by the effect of APC on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The objective of our study was to examine whether persistentAPC resistance determined with an ETP-based normalized APC sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) is a risk marker for venous thromboembolism in women with pregnancy-associated thromboembolism. We determined the activities of antithrombin, protein C, protein S, and performed a genetic analysis of factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin mutation G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation (MTHFR C677T) in 65 women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the puerperium and in 114 normal women. A significantly (p<0.05) higher nAPCsr was present in normal women using hormones, in younger women (≤ 45 yrs), and in women with carrier status of factorV Leiden. In normal women without factor V Leiden a significant (p< 0.05) negative correlation of nAPCsr with age (r= –0.39),antithrombin activity (r= –0.38),protein S activity (r= –0,26),and a significant positive correlation with hormone intake (r= 0.36) was present. nAPCsr is influenced by several coagulation parameters, which are modified by the use of oral contraceptives. Consequently, a multivariate analysis of our data did not show a significant association of nAPCsr to venous thromboembolism, neither as a continuous variable (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.6–1.1, p=0.10) nor using a cutoff value (nAPCsr cut-off 3.1: odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI 0.3–5.3, p=0.77). Our study demonstrates that nAPCsr is not a risk marker for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4720-4720
Author(s):  
Vivek Rashmikant Mehta ◽  
Uzma Khan ◽  
Aparna Basu ◽  
Asif Jan ◽  
Bolanie Gbadamosi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Any inherited or acquired condition that increases the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is considered a thrombophilic disorder. Some examples of inherited causes of thromboembolic disorders are Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL), Prothrombin gene mutation, Protein C deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Protein S deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency (low or dysfunctional). Use of these studies in clinical practice has been questioned. We attempted to identify if there are populations of patients that undergo more inpatient screening for inherited causes of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods Retrospective chart review of patients admitted with PE or DVT in a community teaching hospital between May 2012 and December 2014. Only patients who had DVT confirmed with ultrasound or PE confirmed with CT angiogram or had high probability of PE on V/Q scan were included in the study. Individual charts were reviewed to see if thrombophilia workup was ordered. Results A total of 704 patients with acute venous thromboembolism were identified who met our inclusion criteria for the study. Of this 111 patients (15.76%) had one or more thrombophilia screening studies ordered. Risk factors related to venous thromboembolism were evaluated for all of the 704 patients. In our patient population, patients who were smokers (31% vs 20%), had history of sleep apnea (9% vs 3%), a past medical history (PMH) of VTE (37% vs 25%) or who had a family history (FH) of VTE (11% vs 4%) were more likely to have a thrombophilia workup ordered. Table 2 shows the frequency of individual thrombophilia studies ordered among the 111 patients who had testing performed and table 3 shows distribution of positive results. Table. Test Result Abnormal Test Results ANA 1 Decreased AT III 10 Decreased Protein C 10 Decreased Protein S 7 Increased Homocysteine 6 Factor V Leiden 4 PT Gene Mutation 1 APLA 1 Conclusion The largest numbers of positive test results were noted for Protein C, Protein S and Antithrombin III and these are known to be affected by acute thrombosis and therefore could be false positives. Our study shows that those patients with PMH or FH of VTE were more likely to have thrombophilia studies. There is no consensus opinion as to whether to perform thrombophilia screenings in acute care settings. Given this and the fact that personal or family history of VTE do not usually modify future treatment decisions and that there may be significant number of false positives we do not recommend routine screening in these patient populations. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (08) ◽  
pp. 872-886
Author(s):  
Jonathan Douxfils ◽  
Laure Morimont ◽  
Céline Bouvy

AbstractCombined oral contraceptives (COCs) induce several changes in the levels of coagulation factors. The levels of procoagulant factors are often increased, while levels of anticoagulant factors are decreased. Fibrinolysis is also affected, even if the effect seems to be more counterbalanced by opposite regulation of profibrinolytic and antifibrinolytic factors. These effects on hemostasis are more pronounced with third- or fourth-generation COC compared with second-generation COC. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk increases when multiple risk factors, including genetic and environmental, are present simultaneously. COC use causes changes in coagulation that modify the prothrombotic state induced by preexisting hemostatic alterations in a supra-additive manner. Therefore, testing appears to be of importance not only before implementing COC but also to monitor any potential thrombogenicity induced by COC therapy. Inherited genetic factors, such as factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin mutation, antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiencies, non-O blood group, as well as CYP2C9*2 and the rs4379368 mutations, have all been identified as genetic predictive risk factors of VTE in women. Nevertheless, the screening of these genetic biomarkers is not capable of assessing the phenotypic expression of the risk. This review will focus on the different options for screening the thrombogenic status in this population. Specific attention will be given to the endogenous thrombin potential-based activated protein C resistance, a test aiming at assessing the thrombogenicity induced by hormonal therapies and inherited or acquired thrombophilia.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4985-4985
Author(s):  
Sagar Pathak ◽  
Natalie L. Kamberos

Abstract Case: A Caucasian male infant, born at 39 weeks and 2 days was assessed at 7 hours of life for new onset purpuric changes in toes 1-2, and 5 of the right foot. The course of the pregnancy was complicated by a fetal cardiac mass seen on ultrasound, thus requiring a C-section. Initial course of delivery was complicated by chorioamnionitis due to maternal fever. The patient's mother was treated appropriately with antibiotics prior to delivery. After delivery, APGAR scores were 9/9/9. At day 6 of life, there was progressive discoloration of the R. foot digits 1,2,3, and 5, disproportionate to the general acrocyanosis of the rest of the body. NICU was consulted and he was promptly transferred. Initial examination showed good pulses and oxygenation of the involved limb. No other areas of disproportionate discoloration were seen. Initial evaluation included arterial and venous duplex studies. Each exam showed no evidence of decreased blood flow. Pediatric hematology and vascular surgery were consulted. Per vascular surgery recommendations an aortic duplex was obtained, showing no evidence of thrombosis. Due to clinical picture of purpuric digits, Neonatal Purpura Fulminans was strongly suspected. Initial lab work obtained showed a WBC of 20.5, Hgb/Hct 18.2/55.4, and a platelet count of 196,000. Initial fibrinogen was undetectable. PTT and PT/INR were unable to be obtained. Protein S and Protein C Levels were drawn prior to any intervention. Initial Protein S level was 35%, and initial Protein C level was <20%. After intervention, Protein C levels were redrawn on day 4 of life, and shown to be 48% Due to the initial lab work obtained, the patient was initially started on Fresh Frozen Plasma 20 ml/kg, and Low Molecular Weight Heparin 1.5 mg/kg q 12 hrs. Nitroglycerin paste was applied to the R. foot and toes. After Protein C levels returned undetectable, the patient was switched from FFP to protein C concentrate, (100 U/kg q12h). Warfarin was started on day 3 of life, for transition to long term anticoagulation, with a titration to goal INR of 2.5-3.0. During hospitalization, CT head w/o contrast, and a kidney ultrasound were ordered and seen to be normal. An ophthalmologic examination was also done on day 4 of life, and showed no retinal or vitreous hemorrhage. Following normal screening lab work, and proper transition to Warfarin therapy for outpatient management, patient was discharged home on day 14 of life, with close follow with hematology and genetics. Patient was discharged home on Warfarin 2 mg daily, with a goal INR >2.2. The patient was followed by pediatric hematology after discharge. A second opinion was sought at an outside hospital, at which time patient was trialed off of Warfarin. Genetic studies showed a heterozygous mutation for Factor V Leiden R506Q polymorphism, with normal protein C levels after a trial off of Warfarin, making inherited Protein C deficiency less likely. Discussion: Neonatal Purpura Fulminans is a rare disorder that can be either acquired or inherited. The differential diagnosis for acquired protein C deficiency is vast, ranging from infectious causes with and without DIC, hypoxia, severe hepatic dysfunction, and severe congenital heart disease. Congenital forms of protein C deficiency are generally homozygous. However, the clinician should be aware of the possibility of Factor V Leiden heterozygous mutation causing activated protein C resistance and acquired protein C deficiency in infancy. The concern in this specific case was that the infant may have otherwise been considered to have inherited protein C deficiency until genetic testing revealed otherwise. While waiting for genetic testing results, the infant was carefully monitored on oral anticoagulation. While these measures were taken and helped to prevent thrombosis, no official guidelines are in place for surveillance, treatment, or testing frequency of Protein C levels in infancy. To date, only one other case of Neonatal Purpura Fulminans in association with Factor V R506Q mutation has been reported. In this case, the authors concluded that activated protein C resistance should be included in the evaluation of Neonatal Purpura Fulminans. We hope to build on the existing management guidelines in order to more promptly identify infants with Neonatal Purpura Fulminans and transient protein C deficiency. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document