Inpatient Thrombophilia Workup in Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4720-4720
Author(s):  
Vivek Rashmikant Mehta ◽  
Uzma Khan ◽  
Aparna Basu ◽  
Asif Jan ◽  
Bolanie Gbadamosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Family History ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Test Results ◽  
History Of ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract Background Any inherited or acquired condition that increases the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is considered a thrombophilic disorder. Some examples of inherited causes of thromboembolic disorders are Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL), Prothrombin gene mutation, Protein C deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Protein S deficiency (low or dysfunctional), Anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency (low or dysfunctional). Use of these studies in clinical practice has been questioned. We attempted to identify if there are populations of patients that undergo more inpatient screening for inherited causes of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods Retrospective chart review of patients admitted with PE or DVT in a community teaching hospital between May 2012 and December 2014. Only patients who had DVT confirmed with ultrasound or PE confirmed with CT angiogram or had high probability of PE on V/Q scan were included in the study. Individual charts were reviewed to see if thrombophilia workup was ordered. Results A total of 704 patients with acute venous thromboembolism were identified who met our inclusion criteria for the study. Of this 111 patients (15.76%) had one or more thrombophilia screening studies ordered. Risk factors related to venous thromboembolism were evaluated for all of the 704 patients. In our patient population, patients who were smokers (31% vs 20%), had history of sleep apnea (9% vs 3%), a past medical history (PMH) of VTE (37% vs 25%) or who had a family history (FH) of VTE (11% vs 4%) were more likely to have a thrombophilia workup ordered. Table 2 shows the frequency of individual thrombophilia studies ordered among the 111 patients who had testing performed and table 3 shows distribution of positive results. Table. Test Result Abnormal Test Results ANA 1 Decreased AT III 10 Decreased Protein C 10 Decreased Protein S 7 Increased Homocysteine 6 Factor V Leiden 4 PT Gene Mutation 1 APLA 1 Conclusion The largest numbers of positive test results were noted for Protein C, Protein S and Antithrombin III and these are known to be affected by acute thrombosis and therefore could be false positives. Our study shows that those patients with PMH or FH of VTE were more likely to have thrombophilia studies. There is no consensus opinion as to whether to perform thrombophilia screenings in acute care settings. Given this and the fact that personal or family history of VTE do not usually modify future treatment decisions and that there may be significant number of false positives we do not recommend routine screening in these patient populations. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Heritable and Acquired Thrombophilias in Clinical Practice

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanny Al-Samkari ◽  
Nathan T. Connell
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Thrombophilia Testing

Thrombosis is common in clinical practice. Venous thromboembolism in particular raises questions of a possible underlying hereditary or acquired thrombophilic state. Despite considerable data describing the impact of various thrombophilic states on risks of initial and recurrent thromboembolic events, thrombophilia testing is not standardized. An understanding of the utility and pitfalls of clinical thrombophilia testing is necessary to employ this testing properly. When utilized appropriately, thrombophilia testing can be vital in informing an individual patient’s thrombosis risk and pursuing optimal anticoagulant management. Hereditary thrombophilia testing involves investigation for factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G202010A gene mutation, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Assessment for acquired thrombophilias is perhaps even more important, recognizing the possibility for myeloproliferative neoplasms, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, occult malignancy and other important acquired thrombotic predispositions. Timing of thrombophilia testing in relation to anticoagulation, acute thrombosis, and use of hormonal agents or pregnancy is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis. This review describes each of the most important hereditary and acquired thrombophilias, explains their relationship to venous and arterial thrombosis, delineates evidence-based indications for thrombophilia testing, identifies potential testing pitfalls, and synthesizes the key points in outlining algorithms for thrombophilia testing in clinical practice. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 48 references. Key words: thrombophilia, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hypercoagulability of malignancy

Heritable and Acquired Thrombophilias in Clinical Practice

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanny Al-Samkari ◽  
Nathan T. Connell
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Thrombophilia Testing

Thrombosis is common in clinical practice. Venous thromboembolism in particular raises questions of a possible underlying hereditary or acquired thrombophilic state. Despite considerable data describing the impact of various thrombophilic states on risks of initial and recurrent thromboembolic events, thrombophilia testing is not standardized. An understanding of the utility and pitfalls of clinical thrombophilia testing is necessary to employ this testing properly. When utilized appropriately, thrombophilia testing can be vital in informing an individual patient’s thrombosis risk and pursuing optimal anticoagulant management. Hereditary thrombophilia testing involves investigation for factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G202010A gene mutation, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Assessment for acquired thrombophilias is perhaps even more important, recognizing the possibility for myeloproliferative neoplasms, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, occult malignancy and other important acquired thrombotic predispositions. Timing of thrombophilia testing in relation to anticoagulation, acute thrombosis, and use of hormonal agents or pregnancy is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis. This review describes each of the most important hereditary and acquired thrombophilias, explains their relationship to venous and arterial thrombosis, delineates evidence-based indications for thrombophilia testing, identifies potential testing pitfalls, and synthesizes the key points in outlining algorithms for thrombophilia testing in clinical practice. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 48 references. Key words: thrombophilia, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hypercoagulability of malignancy

Fundamentals and Patient Evaluation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Becker ◽  
Frederick A. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
Occult Malignancy ◽  
History Of

Thrombophilia is the term used to describe a tendency toward developing thrombosis. This tendency may be inherited, involving polymorphism in gene coding for platelet or clotting factor proteins, or acquired due to alterations in the constituents of blood and/or blood vessels. An inherited thrombophilia is likely if there is a history of repeated episodes of thrombosis or a family history of thromboembolism. One should also consider an inherited thrombophilia when there are no obvious predisposing factors for thrombosis or when clots occur in a patient under the age of 45. Repeated episodes of thromboembolism occurring in patients over the age of 45 raise suspicion for an occult malignancy. A summary of inherited thrombophilias are summarized in Table 24.1. This list continues to grow, as new genetic polymorphisms and combined mutations are being detected. The prevalence of common thrombophilias is shown in Figure 24.1. Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation and hyperhomocysteinemia are present in nearly 5% of the general population and are often found in patients with venous thrombosis, while deficiencies of antithrombin (AT), protein C, and protein S are relatively uncommon. Elevated levels of factor VIII (FVIII) are uncovered frequently in the general population and in patients with thrombosis. This is not surprising as FVIII is an acute-phase reactant that increases rapidly after surgery or trauma; however, prospective studies have shown that FVIII elevation in some patients cannot be attributed to a stress reaction and probably represents mutations in the genes regulating FVIII synthesis or release (Kyrle et al., 2000). The same may be true for factors IX and XI. The relative risks for thrombosis among patients with inherited thrombophilias have been determined. While AT mutations are the least common, they are associated with a substantial risk of venous thrombosis; similar risk is seen with protein C and S deficiency. In contrast, the lifetime risk of having a thromboembolic event in an individual heterozygous for FVL is comparatively low (Martinelli et al., 1998). Incidence rates markedly increase with age, and are highest among those with AT deficiency, followed by protein C and protein S, and least with FVL.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in relatives of symptomatic probands with thrombophilia: a systematic review

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (07) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Langlois ◽  
Philip Wells
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Clinical Equipoise ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Protein C Deficiency

SummaryClinical equipoise exists regarding whether relatives of individuals with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia should be screened for thrombophilia. There have been no systematic attempts to summarize studies that have assessed the incidence of VTE in relatives. The purpose of this review was to systematically identify and review observational studies with thrombophilic relatives and to summarize their findings with respect to their risk of VTE.We conducted a systematic literature review and included nine observational studies meeting a priori inclusion criteria. Potentially eligible studies evaluated VTE incidence in relatives of index patients (probands) with symptomatic thrombophilia. In the four prospective studies, the incidence of VTE for asymptomatic family members with factor V Leiden ranged from 0.58-0.67% per year, 1.0-2.5% for protein C deficiency, 0.7-2.2% for protein S deficiency, and 4% for antithrombin deficiency. About half of all VTEs occurred during well-known risk periods but incidence rates were decreased by use of prophylaxis. No deaths from pulmonary embolism or fatal hemorrhages from anticoagulants were reported. The incidence of VTE was generally lower in the retrospective studies. The pooled relative risk from four retrospective studies for factor V Leiden carriers was 3.69 (CI 2.27, 6.00) and from two studies the pooled relative risk for deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin was 10.58 (CI 5.38, 20.81).In conclusion, the risk of VTE events in asymptomatic relatives is low, but this may be an underestimate. Anticoagulant prophylaxis during risk periods appears to be of benefit but further research in this area is required.

Risk of Pregnancy-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Women with a History of Prior Thrombosis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gerhardt ◽  
Rudiger E. Scharf ◽  
Rainer B. Zotz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Previous Episode ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
History Of ◽  
Heparin Prophylaxis

Abstract Background: Previous estimates of the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy in women with a history of VTE have vary between 0 and 13%. Therefore, the decision to administer or withhold heparin - especially in the antepartum period - has been discussed controversial. In a recent study by Brill-Edwards et al. (N Engl J Med2000;343:1439–44), no recurrences of VTE occurred in women (n=44) who had a previous episode of thrombosis that was associated with a temporary risk factor and who also had no evidence of thrombophilia. Based on these results, antepartum heparin prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in women without thrombophilia whose previous episode of thrombosis was associated with a temporary risk factor (ACCP guidelines 2004). The objective of our study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent pregnancy-associated thrombosis in women with a history of VTE. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 198 women with at least one pregnancy (275 pregnancies in total) after a one previous episode of VTE. Sixty-three women (81 pregnancies) were excluded from the analysis because of antepartum heparin prophylaxis. Results: In the subgroup of women without heparin prophylaxis (n=135), 15 (7.7%) thromboembolic events occurred antepartum in 194 pregnancies. Further subgroup analysis, stratified for the nature of first VTE, gave the following number of antepartum VTE per number of pregnancies: 2 VTE/19 pregnancies (10.5%) in 14 women (first VTE: immobilization), 4 VTE/33 pregnancies (12.1%) in 24 women (first VTE: surgery), 5 VTE/69 pregnancies (7.2%) in 46 women (first VTE: oral contraception), 2 VTE/58 pregnancies (3.4%) in 40 women (first VTE: pregnancy), 2 VTE/15 pregnancies (13%) in 11 women (first VTE: idiopathic). Nine of the 15 women with VTE (7/13 women with first VTE triggered by temporary risk factor; 2/2 women with first idiopathic VTE) had a heterozygous factor V Leiden G1691A or prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. In the postpartum period, 16 VTE in 194 pregnancies occurred after live birth in the 135 women without heparin prophylaxis. Nine of these 16 women had a heterozygous FVL or prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. In Conclusion, the risk of recurrent antepartum VTE was similar in women with and without factor V Leiden G1691A or the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation and did not differ between women with first VTE triggered by a transient risk factor or an idiopathic first VTE. In addition to recommended postpartum heparin prophylaxis, our data support the need for a routine antepartum prophylaxis in women without thrombophilia whose previous episode of thrombosis was associated with a temporary risk factor.

Appropriateness of Thrombophilia Testing in Tertiary Care Centers in Edmonton

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4470-4470
Author(s):  
Alabdurubalnabi Zainab ◽  
Salma Shivji ◽  
Cynthia Wu
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Thrombophilia Testing

Abstract INTRODUCTION Thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite this link, determining the presence or absence of such conditions has no role in VTE management including determining the choice or duration of anticoagulant therapy. Testing can be potentially harmful when results are misinterpreted or impact patient anxiety and insurance eligibility. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) or were admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH), Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) and Grey Nuns Hospital (GNH) and underwent any number of thrombophilia tests (including factor V Leiden [FVL], prothrombin gene mutation [PT20210], protein C [PC], protein S [PS], antithrombin [AT] and antiphospholipid antibody testing). To assess for appropriateness of testing, categories of data were collected including presence of other strong risk factors obviating the need to look for other causes, indicators for higher yield (age of patient, presence of family history of VTE, idiopathic nature of VTE), presence of factors that confound testing (such as therapeutic anticoagulation) and relevant follow up (appropriate repeat testing when necessary). We also collected basic patient demographics, VTE details and ordering physician/service details to evaluate under what circumstances testing may be ordered more frequently. RESULTS 134 charts of patients tested for thrombophilia were reviewed between 2007-2013 at UAH and RAH Hospitals. A total of 965 thrombophilia tests were done (see analysis table). 13.4% of the testing was ordered by hematologists, 23.1% by neurologists, 52.2% by other internists. Overall, all patients had tests performed inappropriately, lacked appropriate follow up or had uninterpretable results and none had documented counseling prior to thrombophilia testing. CONCLUSIONS Thrombophilia testing is frequently ordered inappropriately and not adequately followed up. Strategies to educate physicians on indications and limitations of testing are warranted. These strategies can help decrease over/under/misinterpretation of thrombophilia testing as well as result in significant savings to the health care system if testing can be reduced. Table 1. Demographics Sample Size Males Females Total 74 (55.22%) 60 (44.78%) 134 (100%) Age at time of testing (Yrs) Range 19-88 Average 48.7 Patients' Test Results Test Times Performed Abnormal Results APCR 134 (100%) 32 (23.8%) FVL genetic test 58 (43%) 21 (39%) PT20210 105 (77%) 4 (3.8%) Protein C 100 (74.1%) 8 (8%) Protein S 99 (73.3%) 16 (16.2%) AT levels 99 (73.3%) 19 (19.2%) Anticardiolipin Ab 117 (86.7%) 4 (3.4%) Lupus Anticoagulant 109 (81.3%) 10 (10.2%) Provoking Factors Patients with One or More Provoking Factors Major 10 7.4% Moderate 74 56% Minor 29 21.8% No Provoking Factors 49 36.8% Family History of VTE 12 8.9% Protein C and Protein S Testing Done During Acute VTE 64 64% Patient was on Warfarin 25 25% Number of Abnormal Test Results 24 16% Number of Repeated Abnormal Tests 0 0% AT Testing Total Tests Performed 99 73.3% Done During Acute VTE 62 63% Patient was on Therap. Heparin or LMWH 62 62.6% Number of Abnormal Test Results 19 19.2% Abnormal Tests Repeated? 7 37% Repeat Tests Showing Normal Results 3 57% APA Testing Tests were Repeated After 12 Weeks for Confirmation 11% Disclosures Wu: Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Prothrombin Fragment F1+2 Is not Predictive for Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (05) ◽  
pp. 0829-0833 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Kyrle ◽  
S Eichinger ◽  
I Pabinger ◽  
A Stümpflen ◽  
M Hirschl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Recurrent Thrombosis ◽  
Prothrombin Fragment ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
History Of

SummaryIt would be important to estimate in advance the risk of recurrent thrombosis. Deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S, or resistance to activated protein C are associated with a biochemically detectable prethrombotic state. It is thus far unknown whether in patients with a history of thromboembolism but without a defined clotting abnormality a heightened coagulation activation is detectable.We investigated the value of prothrombin fragment Fl+2 (FI+2) as a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, we compared the Fl+2 levels of thrombosis patients without a defined clotting defect to those of Factor V Leiden patients with a history of venous thrombosis and to those of healthy controls. 180 patients without a defined clotting abnormality and 73 patients with Factor V Leiden were prospectively followed after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants for venous thrombosis and Fl+2 was measured at regular intervals.Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 23 (9%) of the 253 patients. Before or at several time points after oral anticoagulants, no significant difference in Fl+2 levels was found in patients with and without recurrent thrombosis. Fl+2 levels at 3 weeks and prior to recurrence were not significantly different in both patient groups. Over a one-year observation period, Fl+2 levels of both patients with and without Factor V Leiden were higher than those of the controls. No difference in Fl+2 was seen between patients with and without Factor V Leiden.We conclude that monitoring of Fl+2 is not suitable for identification of individuals at risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. Permanent hemostatic system activation is detectable both in patients with a defined abnormality of the clotting system and in patients in whom a particular defect has not (yet) been identified.

Co-inheritance of the 20210A Allele of the Prothrombin Gene Increases the Risk of Thrombosis in Subjects with Familial Thrombophilia

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (06) ◽  
pp. 1426-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Makris ◽  
F E Preston ◽  
N J Beauchamp ◽  
P C Cooper ◽  
M E Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Protein C Deficiency ◽  
Antithrombin Deficiency ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic

SummaryThe presence of the 20210A allele of the prothrombin (PT) gene has recently been shown to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. This is probably mediated through increased plasma prothrombin levels. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of the prothrombin 20210A allele in control subjects and in subjects with recognised thrombophilia and to establish whether the additional inheritance of the PT 20210A allele is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. 101 subjects with a history of venous thromboembolism and diagnosed as having either factor V Leiden (R506Q) or heritable deficiencies of protein C, protein S or antithrombin were studied. The prevalence of the PT 20210A allele in this group was compared with the results obtained for 150 control subjects. In addition, the relationships were examined between genetic status and the number of documented thromboembolic episodes, and between plasma prothrombin levels and possession of the PT 20210A allele. 8 (7.9%) of the 101 patients were also heterozygous for the PT 20210A allele. This compares with 0.7% in the control subjects (p = 0.005). After exclusion of patients on warfarin, the mean plasma prothrombin of 113 subjects without 20210A was 1.09 U/ml, as compared with 1.32 U/ml in 8 with the allele (p = 0.0002). Among the 101 patients with either factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency, protein C deficiency or antithrombin deficiency, the age adjusted mean (SD) number of venous thromboembolic episodes at diagnosis was 3.7 (1.5) in those with the PT 20210A allele, as compared with 1.9 (1.1) in those without (p = 0.0001). We have demonstrated that the prevalence of the PT 20210A allele is significantly greater in subjects with venous thrombosis and characterised heritable thrombophilia than in normal control subjects and that the additional inheritance of PT 20210A is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We have also confirmed that plasma prothrombin levels are significantly greater in subjects possessing the PT 20210A compared with those who do not.

4g/5g Prevalence in 223 Patients with Thrombosis and in 162 Healthy Controls, from the Centre Region of Portugal.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4057-4057
Author(s):  
Rosa Maia ◽  
Emilia Cortesao ◽  
Catarina Geraldes ◽  
Luis Simoes ◽  
Carla Simoes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein C ◽  
Antithrombin Iii ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Mthfr C677t ◽  
Insertion Polymorphism ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Centre Region ◽  
History Of ◽  
Pai 1

Abstract A deletion/insertion polymorphism (4G or 5G) in the promoter of the PAI-1 gene has been suggested to be involved in regulation of the synthesis of the inhibitor, the 4G allele being associated with enhanced gene expression, and therefore related with thrombosis. In the present work we studied the prevalence of 4G/5G polymorphism in 223 unrelated patients with history of objectively confirmed thromboembolism, and in 162 healthy unrelated controls, both groups natural from all centre regions of Portugal. In this normal cohort, the prevalence of 4G/4G is 23%, 4G/5G is 38% and 5G/5G is 39%; in the affected population is, respectively, 47%, 21.5% and 30%, which means that 4G/4G is twice more frequent in the patients with thrombosis. When we relate the age of the first thrombosis episodes in the three groups, we find no significative difference, as the respective media is 36.8; 38.6 and 35.5 years in the 4G/4G, 4G/5G and 5G/5G group, respectively. This data suggest that this polymorphism by itself, even in homozygosity, is not associated with earlier thrombosis. In our patients, we studied the presence of Lupus Anticoagulant, Factor V Leiden, Factor IIG20210A, MTHFR C677T, and also Antithrombin III, Protein S and Protein C levels. We analyse the prevalence of the three mutations in patients with DVP, PTE, ischemic and venous CVA and we only find a significative difference in the 4G/4G group: 46.2% patients with DVP and 48.2% patients with PTE (23% in normal cohort). In conclusion, in the centre region of Portugal, the prevalence of 4G/4G is 23%, 4G/5G is 38% and 5G/5G is 39%; in our cohort of unrelated patients the only significative difference is in the 4G/4G group (47%); this variation maintain in the DVP and PTE group. We did not find difference at the age of the first thrombotic episode, in the three groups.

Retrospective Review of Hypercoagulability in Minority Populations at an Inner City Hospital’s General Hematology Clinic.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3973-3973
Author(s):  
Pritesh R. Patel ◽  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
Sunita Nathan ◽  
Griza Decebal ◽  
Rosalind Catchatourian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Inner City ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Minority Populations ◽  
Factor V ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prothrombin Gene Mutation ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

Abstract Background: Although much is known about the incidence of hypercoagulable disorders in the Caucasian population, data is lacking in many other racial groups. We therefore retrospectively analyzed charts of all patients referred to our inner city hospital’s general hematology clinic from January 2003 to December 2006 for evaluation of possible hypercoagulable state. Methods: We reviewed charts for all patients referred for investigation of thrombophilia or hypercoagulable state seen in our clinic. Data regarding history of thrombosis was recorded. In the case of venous thromboembolic disease possible precipitants were noted. Demographic data and family history were noted. A clinical diagnosis of hypercoagulability was made based on whether the patient had any of the following: age <40; strong family history of thrombosis; unusual location of thrombosis; 2 or more thrombotic events; lack of precipitant to thrombotic episode. Laboratory data was gathered on the following: factor V leiden mutation; prothrombin gene mutation; MTHFR mutation; antithrombin III levels; protein C and protein S function; antiphospholipid antibodies. Results: 59 patients were referred. Of these 12 patients were excluded from further analysis as the reason for referral was investigation of ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction. Using the above clinical criteria 33 patients were identified as having hypercoagulability. Diagnoses and demographics are noted in tables 1 and 2. Conclusions: Our study illustrates several important practical points about the investigation of hypercoagulable patients. A larger number of protein C or S deficiencies would likely have been diagnosed had these studies been performed prior to starting anticoagulation. Similarly it is likely that the proportion of patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is high as it is possible to test for this condition whilst patients are anticoagulated. It is therefore appropriate that the best time for testing be disseminated more widely to general internal medicine providers. Importantly it appears that certain diagnostic tests would have a much higher yield in minority populations. It is likely that resources would be better allocated if African American patients in particular were tested initially for the antiphospholipid antibodies and activated protein C resistance rather than prothrombin gene mutations or factor V Leiden. Further prospective studies are planned to confirm these findings. Baseline demographics Race Gender Age Male Female <40 years >40 years All patients 12 21 22 11 African American 6 12 11 7 White 3 5 5 3 Hispanic 1 3 4 0 Asian 2 1 2 1 Diagnosis by ethnic group Race Diagnosis Antiphospholipid Protein S def. ATIII def. V Leiden MTHFR Multiple Disorders Unknown No cases of Protein C deficiency or Prothrombin Gene Mutation identified All patients 12 3 3 1 (heterozygous) 1 2 15 African American 5 2 2 0 1 1 9 White 3 0 0 1 (heterozygous) 0 0 4 Hispanic 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 Asian 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document