Management of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Patients ≥ 65 Years of Age by Homeopath General Practitioners versus Conventional General Practitioners, with Overview of the EPI3-LASER Study Results

Homeopathy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (02) ◽  
pp. 081-089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gérard Duru ◽  
Jean Vetel ◽  
Karine Danno

Background The increasing use of psychotropic drugs to treat anxiety and depressive disorders (ADDs) is concerning. According to the study, ‘Etude Pharmacoépidémiologique de l'Impact de Santé Publique des modes de prise en charge pour 3 groupes de pathologies’ (EPI3)-LASER, adult ADD patients who consult a general practitioner prescribing homeopathic medicines (GP-Ho) report less psychotropic drug use and are marginally more likely to experience clinical improvement than those receiving conventional care. We determined whether these observations also apply to patients ≥ 65 years old in the EPI3 cohort. Methods The EPI3-LASER study, conducted in France between March 2007 and July 2008, was a nationwide, observational survey of the three most common reasons for primary care consultation, including ADD, and the impact of the GPs' prescribing preferences: homeopathy (GP-Ho), conventional medicines (GP-CM) or mixed prescriptions (GP-Mx). This sub-analysis included 110 patients ≥ 65 years old with ADD from the EPI3 cohort who consulted either a GP-CM or GP-Ho. Socio-demographic and medical data and details of any medications prescribed were collected at inclusion. Information regarding the patients' functional status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS)]) was obtained via a telephone interview 72 hours after inclusion, and at 1, 3 and 12 months post-inclusion. Medication use and outcome were determined over the 12-month period. Differences between the GP-CM and GP-Ho groups were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results One hundred and ten patients were recruited and 87 (79.1%) with ADD (HADS ≥ 9) at the 72-hour interview were evaluated (age range: 65–93 years, 82.8% female). Patients who consulted a GP-Ho were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 10.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33–81.07) to have clinical improvement (HADS < 9) after 12 months than those in the GP-CM group. Patients who consulted a GP-Ho reported less psychotropic drug use (OR = 22.31 [95% CI: 2.20–226.31]) and benzodiazepine use (OR = 60.63 [95% CI: 5.75–639.5]) than GP-CM patients. Conclusions Management of ADD patients aged ≥ 65 years by GP-Ho appears to have a real public health interest in terms of effectiveness and lower psychotropic drug use.

2000 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 931-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmel M. Hughes ◽  
Kate L. Lapane ◽  
Vincent Mor ◽  
Naoki Ikegami MD ◽  
Pálmi V. Jónsson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S632-S632
Author(s):  
Kevin McConeghy ◽  
Kim Curyto ◽  
Jenefer M Jedele ◽  
Jennifer Mach ◽  
Orna Intrator ◽  
...  

Abstract The impact of STAR-VA on psychotropic drug use among residents with behavioral symptoms of dementia was evaluated through a difference-in-differences framework. STAR-VA residents enrolled 2013-2017 were evaluated longitudinally pre-post intervention. The primary outcome was the number of as needed administrations with an indication of ‘anxiety’ or ‘agitation’. The analytical cohort included 214 training cases and 1,870 controls from untrained sites meeting eligibility criteria. STAR-VA cases were less white (48% vs. 54%), less black (11% vs. 14%), and had significantly longer median length of stay (830 vs. 261 days), respectively. STAR-VA cases had on average 3.5 as needed doses/month of psychotropic medication before the intervention and 1.7 after, controls averaged 1.8 doses/month. After adjustment for person-time-fixed effects, enrollment was associated with 55% (95% CI:30, 68) reduction or an average 0.8 as needed psychotropic doses/month. Findings demonstrate effectiveness in decreasing as-needed psychotropic drug use among CLC residents, supporting continued implementation of STAR-VA.


2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Giovanni Carta ◽  
Maria Carolina Hardoy ◽  
Mariangela Cadeddu ◽  
Gioia Mura ◽  
Anna Laura Floris ◽  
...  

SummaryAims - To present the results of an epidemiologic research about psychotropic drug use inSardinia. Methods - Cross-sectional study on a sample of 1040 subjects randomly selected from registers. Setting - Community survey on three areas of Sardinia region. Evaluation: interviews carried out byphysicians by means of Italian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Simplified.Drug consumption was evaluated concerning last week before the interview. Main Outcome Measures: point prevalence. Results - The rate of adults of the general population that consumed benzodiazepines was 10.1%, antidepressants 4.2%, 14.7% of the sample was using psychotropic drugs. 60% of subjects with diagnosis of ICD-10 Depressive Episod did not have the right pharmacologic treatment. A relevant proportion of subjects without lifetime psychiatric diagnosis (anxiety and/or depression) used antidepressants (0.8%). The pharmacologic therapies were managed by psychiatrics in 44.2% of cases, antidepressants were managed by general practitioners in 31.8% of subjects. Conclusions - The research underlines an increase of meet needs in subjects affected by depressive episodes against a previous Sardinian survey carried out over ten years ago. This change is parallel to a more frequent management of therapies by general practitioners. Their role seems to become more relevant in treating depressive illness.Declaration of InterestMauro Giovanni Carta has received grants and research support from Regione Autonoma della Sardegna, Council of the European Union, European Union DGXII, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Lundbeck, Pharmacia, Recordati. Maria Carolina Hardoy has received grants and research support from University of Pisa, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Farmades. Bernardo Carpiniello has received grants and research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Recordati, Janssen Cilag, EliLilly, Astra Zeneca.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Barbui ◽  
A. Campomori ◽  
L. Mezzalira ◽  
S. Lopatriello ◽  
R. Da Cas ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
V Kovess ◽  
M Ortun

SummaryFrench publications on psychotropics are curiously few. Data are available and French consumption of psychotropics, at least minor tranquilizers has been consistently reported as being higher than that found in other countries. The authors attempt to answer three questions: is French consuption of psychotropics really higher than other countries? Who is consuming those drugs? In which context? After having reviewed comparative data on sales, data from population surveys are analysed together with samples of prescriptions by different categories of physicians. It seems likely that French people consume more anxiolytics but this does not apply to other psychotropic drugs. Given the fact that drugs are almost free of charge in France, it is always difficult to discriminate between what has been prescribed and what has been taken. Overconsumption of anxiolytics is due to the overconsumption of the elderly population (over 60). Minor tranquilizers are mainly prescribed by general practitioners for psychological reasons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document