Learning curve of a modified technique of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) – analysis of safety and efficacy in 9 consecutive patients with follow-up

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Dolak ◽  
Y Kamogawa-Schifter ◽  
W Sieghart ◽  
M Schoeniger-Hekele ◽  
B Tribl ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Ragi ◽  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Julien Branche ◽  
Sarah Leblanc ◽  
Geoffroy Vanbiervliet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Data on the long-term outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for refractory gastroparesis are lacking. We report the results of a large multicenter long-term follow-up study of G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of all G-POEM operations performed in seven expert French centers for refractory gastroparesis with at least 1 year of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the 1-year clinical success rate, defined as at least a 1-point improvement in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Results: 76 patients were included (60.5 % women; age 56 years). The median symptom duration was 48 months. The median gastric retention at 4 hours (H4) before G-POEM was 45 % (interquartile range [IQR] 29 % – 67 %). The median GCSI before G-POEM was 3.6 (IQR 2.8 – 4.0). Clinical success was achieved in 65.8 % of the patients at 1 year, with a median rate of reduction in the GCSI score of 41 %. In logistic regression analysis, only a high preoperative GCSI satiety subscale score was predictive of clinical success (odds ratio [OR] 3.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01 – 11.54; P = 0.048), while a high rate of gastric retention at H4 was significantly associated with clinical failure (OR 0.97, 95 %CI 0.95 – 1.00; P = 0.03). Conclusions: The results confirm the efficacy of G-POEM for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis, as evidenced by a 65.8 % clinical success rate at 1 year. Although G-POEM is promising, prospective sham-controlled trials are urgently needed to confirm its efficacy and identify the patient populations who will benefit most from this procedure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuqiang Liu ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Ying Fang ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Hongbin Yang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (03) ◽  
pp. 304-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongqing Zheng ◽  
Chunshan Zhao ◽  
Shuai Su ◽  
Xiaofei Fan ◽  
Wei Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims On the basis of lesser rates of major adverse events and a short-term efficacy as Heller’s myotomy, there is a growing enthusiasm in favor of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), whereas study comparing POEM and pneumatic dilatation (PD) is quite rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of POEM and PD in Chinese achalasia patients in a retrospectively designed study. Methods Patients with achalasia, who underwent either PD (n = 26) or POEM (n = 40) were retrospectively recruited from September 2010 through March 2016 at a single tertiary center. During the 1-year follow-up, clinical outcome and functional data of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were recruited. Clinical symptoms were assessed by use of the Eckardt score. The primary outcome was therapeutic success (Eckardt score ≤ 3). Functional data of LES (4-second integrated relaxation pressure [4s-IRP], LES relax rate, and LESP) at baseline and 1 month after treatment were also evaluated. Data was analyzed by SPSS 13.0 version using a significance level of p < 0.05. Results The success rates were 24/26 (92.31 %), 25/26 (96.15 %), and 24/26 (92.31 %), respectively, with POEM, as compared with 35/40 (87.50 %), 29/40 (72.50 %), and 23/40 (57.50 %), respectively, with PD, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment. Statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 therapies (at 3 months, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.01; at 1 year, Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001). Compared with PD, the Eckardt score was lower with POEM 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment. More patients in POEM group reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (after 3 months 7/26 (26.92 %) vs. 2/40 (5.00 %), Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.01; after 1 year 6/26 (19.23 %) vs. 1/35 (2.86 %), Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.02). The postoperative 4s-IRP and LESP were both lower with POEM than with PD, respectively. Type I achalasia had a better response with POEM than with PD. Conclusion In this retrospective analysis with 1-year follow-up, POEM presents with a higher success rate and more reflux symptoms compared with PD. Change on LES function after treatment may explain the outcome in part. Type I achalasia may respond better to therapies compared with type II.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka ◽  
Ramprasad Jegadeesan ◽  
Prashanthi N. Thota ◽  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
Rocio Lopez ◽  
...  

Background and Aims. We initiated peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) utilizing a two-person technique with combination of an advanced endoscopist and a thoracic surgeon with complementary skills. Our aim was to determine the feasibility and outcomes in initial 20 patients. Methods. In this observational study, main outcomes measured were therapeutic success in relieving symptoms (Eckardt score < 3), decrease in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures, improvement in emptying on timed barium esophagogram (TBE), and complications.Results. POEM was successful in all 20 patients with a mean operative time of140.1+32.9minutes. Eckardt symptom scores decreased significantly at two-month follow-up (6.4+2.9versus0.25+0.45,p<0.001). Both basal and residual LES pressures decreased significantly (28.2+14.1 mmHg versus12.8+6.3and22.4+11.3versus6.3+3.4 mmHg,p=0.025and <0.001, resp.). Barium column height at 5 minutes on TBE reduced from6.8+4.9 cm to2.3+2.9 cm (p=0.05). Two patients (10%) had mucosal perforations and one had delayed bleeding (5%).Conclusions.Two-person technique of POEM with combination of an advanced endoscopist and a thoracic surgeon is highly successful with low risk of complications.


Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Bapaye ◽  
Parag Dashatwar ◽  
Siddharth Dharamsi ◽  
Rajendra Pujari ◽  
Harshal P Gadhikar

Background and Aim Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia cardia (AC), however post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux (GER) remains a significant problem. Concomitant endoscopic fundoplication following POEM (POEM+F) was recently described to reduce post-POEM GER. This single-center study reports medium-term outcomes of POEM+F. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POEM+F. Abstracted data – demographics, achalasia type, pre-POEM Eckardt score (ES), prior therapy, follow-up. Follow-up was 3-monthly for one-year. Follow-up assessments included post-POEM ES, GerdQ score, EGD – wrap integrity and esophagitis, and pH studies. GER was defined according to Lyon consensus. Data was recorded as mean (SD) or median (IQR), P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results 25 patients underwent POEM+F, mean age (SD) – 40.13 (13.66) years, 12 females. POEM+F was technically successful in 23/25 (92%). Significant dysphagia improvement was seen in all 25 (mean [SD] pre- and post-POEM ES 8.21 [1.08] and 0.1 [0.3] respectively, p < 0.05). Mean total procedure and fundoplication time (SD) – 115.6 (27.2) and 46.7 (12.4) minutes respectively. Time reduced significantly after initial 5 cases. Median follow-up was 12-months (IQR 9 – 13). Intact wrap was seen in 19/23 (82.6%). GER (abnormal EAET) was seen in 2/18 (11.1%); one reported GerdQ > 8. Borderline GER (asymptomatic grade A esophagitis, normal EAET) was identified in 4/22 (18.1%). Two (8%) minor delayed adverse events required no intervention. Conclusions POEM+F is safe and reproducible. At 12-months follow-up, incidence of post-POEM+F GER was low and acceptable.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 890-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Chen ◽  
Quan-peng Li ◽  
Guo-zhong Ji ◽  
Xian-xiu Ge ◽  
Xiu-hua Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document