scholarly journals Best Paper Selection

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 091-092
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Perceived Workload ◽  
Data Collections

Hosseini M , Faiola A, Jones J, Vreeman DJ, Wu H, Dixon BE. Impact of document consolidation on healthcare providers’ perceived workload and information reconciliation tasks: a mixed methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019;26(2):134-42 https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/26/2/134/5253582 Yeung T. Local health department adoption of electronic health records and health information exchanges and its impact on population health. Int J Med Inform 2019;128:1-6 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386505618310426?via%3Dihub Souza J, Santos JV, Canedo VB, Betanzos A, Alves D, Freitas A. Importance of coding co-morbidities for APR-DRG assignment: Focus on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Health Inf Manag 2020;49(1):47-57 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1833358319840575?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed Hannigan A, Villarroel N, Roura M, LeMaster J, Basogomba A, Bradley C, MacFarlane A. Ethnicity recording in health and social care data collections in Ireland: where and how is it measured and what is it used for?. Int J Equity Health 2019;19(1):2 https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-019-1107-y

scholarly journals Characteristics of value-based health and social care from organisations’ perspectives (OrgValue): a mixed-methods study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e022635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Ansmann ◽  
Hendrik Ansgar Hillen ◽  
Ludwig Kuntz ◽  
Stephanie Stock ◽  
Vera Vennedey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Health And Social Care

scholarly journals DISABILITY DUE TO THE CLASS OF RESPIRATORY DISEASES IN ELDERLY PEOPLE

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Marina A. Shurgaya
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Age ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Functional Features

The main strategic task of the provision for health and social care and alimentation of the quality of life in the elderly patient is the implementation of clinical, diagnostic and preventive measures, taking into account characteristics of the course of different diseases in geriatric population. In an article there are highlighted modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of bronchial asthma, which is the leading pathology that determines the morbidity and disability due to diseases of the respiratory system in elderly citizens. Accounting for the morphological and functional features of the elderly age allows provide the medical and social care and achieve quality standards in the treatment of asthma in the geriatric population.

scholarly journals A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Carroll ◽  
Katie Evans ◽  
Khalifa Elmusharaf ◽  
Patrick O’Donnell ◽  
Anne Dee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Data Dictionary ◽  
Regional Data ◽  
National Surveys ◽  
Concept Of Health ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Data Collections

Abstract Background Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. Methods One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. Results Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. Conclusions While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers.

scholarly journals A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Carroll ◽  
Katie Evans ◽  
Khalifa Elmusharaf ◽  
Patrick O'Donnell ◽  
Anne Dee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Inequalities ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Data Dictionary ◽  
Regional Data ◽  
National Surveys ◽  
Concept Of Health ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Data Collections

Abstract Background Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS. The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. Methods One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. Results Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. There was a lack of consistency in the definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined. Conclusions While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed standardised statifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in the use of equity stratifiers.

Challenges and chances for local health and social care integration – Lessons from Greater Manchester, England

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Fang Chang
Keyword(s):  
Social Care ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Collaborative Partnerships ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Local Leadership ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Care Integration ◽  
Health And Social Care

PurposeSustainability and transformation partnerships (STPs) were introduced to England, asking 44 local areas to submit their health and social care plans for the period from October 2016 to March 2021. This study aims to offer a deeper understanding of the complex structure in the local practice, and to discuss the associated challenges and chances.Design/methodology/approachDocumentary analysis, qualitative interviews and questionnaire survey are used for this study. Findings have been compared and analysed thematically.FindingsThe study participants reported that apart from pooled budgets, past collaborative experience and local leadership are crucial elements for transforming health and social care integration in Greater Manchester (GM). Also, this study provides policy recommendations to promote effective collaborative partnerships in local practices and mitigate local inequity of funding progress.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this paper cannot be extrapolated to all stakeholders due to the limited samples. Meanwhile, some of the discussions about the case of GM may not be transferrable to other STPs.Originality/valueThis study argues that the success of pooled budgets is the result, rather than the cause, of effective negotiations between various stakeholders; and therefore, there is no evidence suggesting that pooled budgets can resolve the discoordination of health and social care. Moreover, due to the bottom-up approach adopted by STPs, more effective boroughs tend to receive additional funding, resulting in an increasing gap of development between effective and ineffective boroughs.

scholarly journals Care needs of elderly people with schizophrenia

2003 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seamus V. Mcnulty ◽  
Laing Duncan ◽  
Margaret Semple ◽  
Graham A. Jackson ◽  
Anthony J. Pelosi
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Continuing Care ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Psychotic Illness ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Uk

BackgroundLittle is known of the needs of elderly patients with psychotic illnesses.AimsTo measure the care needs of an epidemiologically based group of patients over the age of 65 years suffering from psychotic illness, using a standardised assessment.MethodAll patients aged 65 years and over with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and related disorders from a defined catchment area were identified. Their health and social care needs were investigated using the Cardinal Needs Schedule.ResultsThe 1-year prevalence of schizophrenia and related disorders was 4.44 per 1000 of the population at risk. There were high levels of unmet need for many patients, including those in National Health Service (NHS) continuing-care beds.ConclusionsMany needs were identified, all of which could be addressed using the existing skills of local health and social care professionals. The investigation raises serious concerns about standards of hospital and community care for elderly patients with schizophrenia. The findings may be unique, reflecting long-standing problems within a particularly hard-pressed part of the NHS. However, it is not known whether a similar situation exists in other parts of the UK.

scholarly journals Health and Wellbeing Boards: The new system stewards?

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Coleman ◽  
Surindar Dhesi ◽  
Stephen Peckham
Keyword(s):  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Health And Wellbeing ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
New System

Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs) emerged from debates about the Health and Social Care Bill (2011) as a key coordinating mechanism or steward for local health and social care systems. For many this is yet a further attempt to improve coordination between health and social care services which historically has been a mixed experience. The rationale for HWBs, however, includes a broader coordinating function across local authority services with a role in addressing the wider social determinants of health such as housing, education and planning, as well as social care. This chapter examines the development of HWBs and draws on the findings of studies conducted by the authors and considers whether or not HWBs are emerging as system stewards. By this the authors mean HWBs acting at a strategic level to coordinate and set the direction of health and social care developments at the local level, as well as encouraging integrated working.

scholarly journals How Do People Who Are Homeless Find Out about Local Health and Social Care Services: A Mixed Method Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Vanessa Heaslip ◽  
Sue Green ◽  
Bibha Simkhada ◽  
Huseyin Dogan ◽  
Stephen Richer
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Third Sector ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
One To One ◽  
The Uk

Background: There are significant numbers of people experiencing homelessness both in the UK and internationally. People who are homeless are much more likely to die prematurely and, therefore, need strong access to ongoing health and social care support if we hope to address the health disparity they face. Objectives: The aim of the research was to explore how people who are homeless identify and locate appropriate health and social care services. Design: A mixed methods research study was applied on people who are currently homeless or had previously experienced homelessness. Settings: The research study was based in an urban area in the southwest of England. The area was chosen as it was identified to be in the top 24 local authorities for the number of homeless individuals. Participants: A hundred individuals participated in the survey, of those 32% were living on the streets whilst 68% were living in temporary accommodation such as a charity home, shelter or a hotel paid for by the local authority. In addition, 16 participated in either a focus group or one-to-one interview Methods: The quantitative component consisted of a paper-based questionnaire whilst the qualitative aspect was focus groups/one-to-one interviews. The COREQ criteria were used in the report of the qualitative aspects of the study. Results: Quantitative data identified poor health in 90% of the sample. Access to both healthcare and wider wellbeing services (housing and food) was problematic and support for this was largely through third sector charity organisations. Qualitative data identified numerous systemic, individual and cultural obstacles, leaving difficulty for people in terms of knowing who to contact and how to access services, largely relying on word of mouth of other people who are homeless. Conclusions: In order to address health inequities experienced by people who are homeless, there is a need to review how information regarding local health and wider wellbeing services is provided in local communities.

scholarly journals COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadie Bell ◽  
Richard M Clarke ◽  
Sharif A Ismail ◽  
Oyinkansola Ojo-Aromokudu ◽  
Habib Naqvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Black African ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Uk

AbstractBackgroundThe UK began delivering its COVID-19 vaccination programme on 8 December 2020, with health and social care workers (H&SCWs) given high priority for vaccination. Despite well- documented occupational exposure risks, however, there is evidence of lower uptake among some H&SCW groups.MethodsWe used a mixed-methods approach - involving an online cross-sectional survey and semi- structured interviews – to gain insight into COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours amongst H&SCWs in the UK by socio-demographic and employment variables. 1917 people were surveyed – 1658 healthcare workers (HCWs) and 261 social care workers (SCWs). Twenty participants were interviewed.FindingsWorkplace factors contributed to vaccination access and uptake. SCWs were more likely to not be offered COVID-19 vaccination than HCWs (OR:1.453, 95%CI: 1.244 – 1.696). SCWs specifically reported uncertainties around how to access COVID-19 vaccination. Participants who indicated stronger agreement with the statement ‘I would recommend my organisation as a place to work’ were more likely to have been offered COVID-19 vaccination (OR:1.28, 95%CI: 1.06 – 1.56). Those who agreed more strongly with the statement ‘I feel/felt under pressure from my employer to get a COVID-19 vaccine’ were more likely to have declined vaccination (OR:1.75, 95%CI: 1.27– 2.41). Interviewees that experienced employer pressure to get vaccinated felt this exacerbated their vaccine concerns and increased distrust.In comparison to White British and White Irish participants, Black African and Mixed Black African participants were more likely to not be offered (OR:2.011, 95%CI: 1.026 – 3.943) and more likely to have declined COVID-19 vaccination (OR:5.55, 95%CI: 2.29 – 13.43). Reasons for declining vaccination among Black African participants included distrust in COVID-19 vaccination, healthcare providers, and policymakers.ConclusionH&SCW employers are in a pivotal position to facilitate COVID-19 vaccination access, by ensuring staff are aware of how to get vaccinated and promoting a workplace environment in which vaccination decisions are informed and voluntary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document