scholarly journals Imaging of Portal Gastroduodenopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh V. Helavar ◽  
Vidyasagar Ramappa ◽  
Praveen P. Wali
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Elevated Pressure ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Portal Venous System ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Great Specificity ◽  
Plan Management ◽  
Anatomic Information ◽  
Entire Gastrointestinal Tract

AbstractPortal hypertension is characterized by elevated pressure in portal venous system due to portal resistance due to various causes. The etiologies are either pre-hepatic, hepatic, or post-hepatic. Elevated portal pressure results in varices at various sites some of which are difficult to identify on endoscopy alone. Other manifestations of elevated portal pressure include portal gastropathy, enteropathy, colopathy, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and ascites. Imaging plays an essential role in diagnosis and imaging of various manifestations of portal hypertension by determining the locations of varices and plan the management for same. Endoscopy helps in visualizing mucosal varices but newer imaging modalities give a panoramic extent of the disease in the entire gastrointestinal tract with great specificity and sensitivity. Initially, Barium study was used to determine esophageal or gastric varices, computed tomography provides detailed anatomic information which can be used to plan management. Due to advancement in imaging and interventional techniques, treatment for varices has seen advent of multiple minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques. A brief outlook on anatomical aspect of varices and various recent advances in management of the same has been provided. Overall knowledge of the various imaging manifestations of portal hypertension can be helpful to evaluate prognosis and plan proper management.

scholarly journals Unilateral Giant Varicocele Mimicking Inguinal Hernia Resulting from Portosystemic Shunt without Evidence of Portal Hypertension: An Unusual Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Zahir ◽  
Hassan R. Al Muttairi ◽  
Surjya Prasad Upadhyay ◽  
Piyush N. Mallick
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Venous System ◽  
Portal Venous System ◽  
Rare Presentation ◽  
Testicular Vein ◽  
Pampiniform Plexus ◽  
Surgical History

Isolated giant varicocele has been reported with portal hypertension that results in abnormal communication between portal venous system and testicular vein venous system resulting in retrograde backflow of blood into the testicular venous system which leads to varicosity of the pampiniform plexuses. 65-year-old male with no past medical or surgical history presented to us with soft inguinoscrotal swelling that disappears on lying down mimicking inguinal hernia. Clinical examination revealed soft inguionoscrotal swelling that disappears on pressure. Ultrasonography revealed varicosity of pampiniform plexus, and CT angiography to trace the extent of the varicosity revealed abnormal communication of right testicular vein with superior mesenteric vein. There was no evidence of any portal hypertension; the cause of the portosystemic shunt remains obscure, and it might be a salvage pathway for increasing portal pressure. The case is noteworthy for its rare presentation and abnormal communication with portal venous system in the absence of evidence of portal hypertension.

scholarly journals Managing liver cirrhotic complications: Overview of esophageal and gastric varices

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana ◽  
Monica Raharjo ◽  
Rino A. Gani
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Esophagogastric Varices ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Gradient Measurement

Managing liver cirrhosis in clinical practice is still a challenging problem as its progression is associated with serious complications, such as variceal bleeding that may increase mortality. Portal hypertension (PH) is the main key for the development of liver cirrhosis complications. Portal pressure above 10 mmHg, termed as clinically significant portal hypertension, is associated with formation of varices; meanwhile, portal pressure above 12 mmHg is associated with variceal bleeding. Hepatic vein pressure gradient measurement and esophagogastroduodenoscopy remain the gold standard for assessing portal pressure and detecting varices. Recently, non-invasive methods have been studied for evaluation of portal pressure and varices detection in liver cirrhotic patients. Various guidelines have been published for clinicians’ guidance in the management of esophagogastric varices which aims to prevent development of varices, acute variceal bleeding, and variceal rebleeding. This writing provides a comprehensive review on development of PH and varices in liver cirrhosis patients and its management based on current international guidelines and real experience in Indonesia.

scholarly journals A comparative study of multi-detector CT portography versus endoscopy in evaluation of gastro-esophageal varices in portal hypertension patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany El-Assaly ◽  
Lamiaa I. A. Metwally ◽  
Heba Azzam ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Seif-Elnasr
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Splenic Vein ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Vein Diameter

Abstract Background Portal hypertension is a major complication resulting from obstruction of portal blood flow, like cirrhosis or portal vein thrombosis, that leads to portal hypertension. MDCT angiography has become an important tool for investigation of the liver as well as potentially challenging varices by detailing the course of these tortuous vessels. This information is decisive for liver transplantation as well as for common procedures in which an unexpected varix can cause significant bleeding. Results This study included an assessment of 60 cases of portal hypertension (28 males and 32 females), their age ranged from 42 to 69 years (mean age = 57.2 ± 6.63). All patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension, underwent upper GI endoscopy followed by a triphasic CT scan with CT angiographic assessment for the screening of gastro-esophageal varices. CT is highly sensitive as compared to upper GI endoscopy (sensitivity 93%) in detecting esophageal varices. Gastric varices detected by CT in 22 patients (37%) compared to 14 patients (23%) detected by endoscopy. While paraesophageal varices were detected in 63% of patients and retro-gastric varices in 80% of patients that were not visualized by endoscopy. Our study reported that the commonest type of collaterals were the splenic collaterals, and we also found there is a significant correlation between the portal vein diameter and the number of collaterals as well as between the portal vein diameter and splenic vein diameter. Conclusions Multi-slice CT serves as an important non-invasive imaging modality in the diagnosis of collaterals in cases of portal hypertension. CT portography can replace endoscopy in the detection of high-risk varices. It also proved that there is a correlation between portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and number of collaterals.

Randomised clinical study: acute effects of metformin versus placebo on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaj Rittig ◽  
Niels Kristian Aagaard ◽  
Gerda Elisabeth Villadsen ◽  
Thomas Damgaard Sandahl ◽  
Niels Jessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Acute Effects

scholarly journals Endoscopic follow-up of cyanoacrylate obliteration of gastric varices

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Prata Martins ◽  
Erika Pereira de Macedo ◽  
Gustavo Andrade de Paulo ◽  
Frank Shigueo Nakao ◽  
José Celso Ardengh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Mild Abdominal Pain ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

Bleeding from gastric varices is a life-threatening condition. We report our experience with cyanoacrylate injection. Twenty three patients with portal hypertension and gastric varices underwent intra-variceal injection of a cyanoacrylate/lipiodol solution (1:1). Study endpoint was variceal obliteration. Mean follow-up was 25.3 months. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 87% of patients. Recurrence occurred in one patient (4.3%) and rebleeding in another case (4.3%). Mild abdominal pain was described in 13% of patients. Overall mortality was 21.7% and rebleeding related mortality rate was 4.3%. Our results confirm that cyanoacrylate injection is effective and safe to eradicate gastric varices.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Management of Portal Hypertension

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said A. Al-Busafi ◽  
Peter Ghali ◽  
Philip Wong ◽  
Marc Deschenes
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Interventional Therapy ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Diagnostic Modality ◽  
Gastroesophageal Varices ◽  
Life Threatening

Cirrhosis is the leading cause of portal hypertension worldwide, with the development of bleeding gastroesophageal varices being one of the most life-threatening consequences. Endoscopy plays an indispensible role in the diagnosis, staging, and prophylactic or active management of varices. With the expected future refinements in endoscopic technology, capsule endoscopy may one day replace traditional gastroscopy as a diagnostic modality, whereas endoscopic ultrasound may more precisely guide interventional therapy for gastric varices.

Diagnostic Value of Portal Vein Velocity for Portal Hypertension in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-related Cirrhosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changchun Liu ◽  
Sizhe Chen ◽  
Xinwen Yan ◽  
Yi Xiang ◽  
Jialiang Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Variceal Hemorrhage ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Rule Out

Background: Portal vein velocity (PVV) has shown reasonable correlation with the presence of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. This study aims to evaluate the value of PVV for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and predicting the risk of variceal hemorrhage (VH) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. Material and Methods: A cohort of 166 consecutive adult patients with HBV-related cirrhosis was recruited in this retrospective study from two high-volume liver centers in China between April 2015 and April 2017. The performance of PVV and other non-invasive parameters for diagnosing CSPH and predicting risk of VH were studied. Results: PVV demonstrated the best performance for diagnosing CSPH (defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg) in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis among the included noninvasive predictors with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity of 0.745, 50%, and 93.5%, respectively. Other noninvasive markers, including APRI, AAR, LS, FIB-4, and diameter of portal vein, did not show sufficient performance with the AUCs of 0.565, 0.560, 0.544, 0.529, and 0.474, respectively. With regard to predicting the risk of VH (defined as an HVPG ≥12 mmHg), PPV also exhibited a moderate performance with an AUC of 0.762, which was superior to that of the aforementioned markers. By using two cutoff values of PVV to rule-out (11.65 cm/s) and rule-in (20.20 cm/s) CSPH, 30 (33.7%) patients showed definite results categories, with 23 (76.7%) patients were well classified and 7 (23.3%) were misclassified. Fifty-nine (66.3%) patients were with indeterminate results. By using PVV values of 13.10 cm/s and 21.40 cm/s to rule-out and rule-in HVPG ≥ 12mmHg, 34 (38.2%) patients has definite results, among whom 26 (76.5%) were well classified and 8 (23.5%) were misclassified. And 55 (61.8%) patients required further evaluation. Conclusion: PPV is not good enough to serve as a non-invasive parameter for identifying CSPH and predicting risk of VH in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document