scholarly journals Endoscopic Management of Portal Hypertension

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said A. Al-Busafi ◽  
Peter Ghali ◽  
Philip Wong ◽  
Marc Deschenes

Cirrhosis is the leading cause of portal hypertension worldwide, with the development of bleeding gastroesophageal varices being one of the most life-threatening consequences. Endoscopy plays an indispensible role in the diagnosis, staging, and prophylactic or active management of varices. With the expected future refinements in endoscopic technology, capsule endoscopy may one day replace traditional gastroscopy as a diagnostic modality, whereas endoscopic ultrasound may more precisely guide interventional therapy for gastric varices.

Author(s):  
Fateh Bazerbachi ◽  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
Swarup Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Misra ◽  
Navtej S Buttar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Endoscopic cyanoacrylate (glue) injection of fundal varices may result in life-threatening embolic adverse events through spontaneous gastrorenal shunts (GRSs). Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous occlusion (BRTOcc) of GRSs during cyanoacrylate injection may prevent serious systemic glue embolization through the shunt. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined endoscopic–interventional radiologic (BRTOcc) approach for the treatment of bleeding fundal varices. Methods We retrospectively analysed the data of patients who underwent the combined procedure for acutely bleeding fundal varices between January 2010 and April 2018. Data were extracted for patient demographics, clinical and endoscopic findings, technical details, and adverse events of the endoscopic–BRTOcc approach and patient outcomes. Results We identified 30 patients (13 [43.3%] women; median age 58 [range, 25–92] years) with gastroesophageal varices type 2 (53.3%, 16/30) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (46.7%, 14/30) per Sarin classification, and median clinical and endoscopic follow-up of 151 (range, 4–2,513) days and 98 (range, 3–2,373) days, respectively. The median volume of octyl-cyanoacrylate: Lipiodol injected was 7 (range, 4–22) mL. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in three (10.0%) patients, including transient fever, non-life-threatening pulmonary glue embolism, and an injection-site ulcer bleed. Complete gastric variceal obturation was achieved in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%) at endoscopic follow-up. Delayed variceal rebleeding was confirmed in one patient (3.3%) and suspected in two patients (6.7%). Although no procedure-related deaths occurred, the overall mortality rate was 46.7%, primarily from liver-disease progression and co-morbidities. Conclusion The combined endoscopic–BRTOcc procedure is a relatively safe and effective technique for bleeding fundal varices, with a high rate of variceal obturation and a low rate of serious adverse events.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Prata Martins ◽  
Erika Pereira de Macedo ◽  
Gustavo Andrade de Paulo ◽  
Frank Shigueo Nakao ◽  
José Celso Ardengh ◽  
...  

Bleeding from gastric varices is a life-threatening condition. We report our experience with cyanoacrylate injection. Twenty three patients with portal hypertension and gastric varices underwent intra-variceal injection of a cyanoacrylate/lipiodol solution (1:1). Study endpoint was variceal obliteration. Mean follow-up was 25.3 months. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 87% of patients. Recurrence occurred in one patient (4.3%) and rebleeding in another case (4.3%). Mild abdominal pain was described in 13% of patients. Overall mortality was 21.7% and rebleeding related mortality rate was 4.3%. Our results confirm that cyanoacrylate injection is effective and safe to eradicate gastric varices.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavik Bharat Shah ◽  
Usha Goenka ◽  
Mahesh Kumar Goenka

Portal hypertension (PH) is a serious consequence of several disease states affecting prehepatic, intrahepatic, or posthepatic portal circulation. Backpressure caused by PH transmits through the collaterals to form varices at various sites. PH also leads to hyperdynamic congestion and altered gastrointestinal mucosal immune response, resulting in portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG), portal hypertensive enteropathy (PHE), and portal colopathy (PC). These PH associated phenomena may lead to torrential life-threatening bleed or chronic blood loss leading to debilitating chronic anemia. Endoscopy plays a pivotal role in the management of these patients both for diagnostic and therapeutic purpose. The choice of therapeutic strategy depends on many factors: severity of the disease, patient’s clinical performance, and whether it is done as an emergency or as a prophylactic approach. In this chapter, we evaluate the endoscopic management of patients with the gastrointestinal complications of PH.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 931-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
PJ Belletrutti ◽  
J Romagnuolo ◽  
RJ Hilsden ◽  
F Chen ◽  
B Kaplan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Gastric variceal bleeding is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension. Outside of North America, gastric variceal injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate has been shown to be safe and effective. The majority of studies on this mode of therapy are in Asian populations in which the etiology of portal hypertension differs from North America.AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of gastric variceal glue injection in a North American population.METHODS: Consecutive patients that underwent glue injection of gastric varices in the Calgary Health Region from 2001 to 2006 were assessed.RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (19 men, 15 women) underwent a total of 47 separate gluing procedures. Of those presenting with active bleeding at endoscopy, immediate hemostasis was achieved in 93.8% of patients. Rebleeding within 48 h of gluing was observed after four procedures. Gastric varices were eradicated in 84.0% of cases. Complications included superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in one patient. Twenty-eight (82.4%) patients were alive at the end of follow-up. The treatment failure-related mortality rate was 2.1%.CONCLUSIONS: The present study is one of the few to assess the role of gastric variceal gluing in a North American population. Glue injection with cyanoacrylate is safe and effective in the treatment of bleeding gastric varices.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salahuddin Mahmud ◽  
Syed Shafi Ahmed ◽  
Jahida Gulshan ◽  
Farhana Tasneem ◽  
Madhabi Baidya

Background: Variceal bleeding is often a life threatening clinical situation in infants and children. Band ligation is the main endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices.Objective: To see the outcome of band ligation of esophageal varices in extra-hepatic and hepatic cases of portal hypertension.Methods: This prospective study was done in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh on 40 consecutive cases of esophageal varices enrolled from April, 2014 to March 2016. Every case was treated with band ligation followed by tab. propranolol. Cases were followed up for a minimum period of one year after the band ligation.Results: Age of the children was 2-12 years with mean age of 7.2±4.3 years and male:female ratio was 1.5:1. Out of 40 children, 32 (80%) were pre-hepatic and 8 (20%) hepatic (chronic liver disease with portal hypertension) causes. Only 1 session required in 50% pre-hepatic cases and multiple (2-3) sessions required in hepatic (100%) cases. Almost same number of band (average 2-3) required in every session of both cases. Grade-II esophageal varices with red sign were more common in prehepatic cases & severity of grading much more (grade-III & IV) in hepatic cases. Gastric varices were more common in hepatic (50%) cases than extra-hepatic (12.5%) cases. Recurrence of bleeding occurred in all hepatic (100%) cases and half (50%) of the pre-hepatic cases. Early re-bleeding was more common in hepatic (75%) cases & late re-bleeding in both pre-hepatic (43.7%) & hepatic (100%) cases. Minimal side effect like discomfort (10%) & Nausea (10%) were present after the procedure.Conclusion: Pre-hepatic was the most common etiology of portal hypertension in studied children. Fewer sessions were required in pre-hepatic cases than in hepatic cases. Severity of grading, re-bleeding & associated gastric varices were more common in hepatic cases. Band ligation was found to be the treatment of choice for the control of acute variceal bleeding and prevention of re-bleeding with less complications.Bangladesh J Child Health 2017; VOL 41 (1) :28-33


2020 ◽  
pp. 3068-3080
Author(s):  
Marcus Robertson ◽  
Peter Hayes

Portal hypertension refers to a pathological elevation of pressure in the veins that carry blood from the splanchnic organs to the liver which, in developed countries, most commonly results from increased intrahepatic resistance to portal flow as a result of liver cirrhosis. Portal hypertension is associated with development of many of the complications of cirrhosis and confers a poor prognosis. Acute variceal bleeding is a life-threatening medical emergency which remains a leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. Endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic variceal obturation remain the treatments of choice for bleeding oesophageal and gastric varices respectively. Advances in care including prophylactic antibiotics, vasoactive drugs, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with bleeding refractory to early endoscopic management has improved the mortality rate, which is now estimated at 15 to 20%. Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding with nonselective β‎-blockers and/or endoscopic variceal ligation reduces recurrent bleeding and has been demonstrated to improve survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 263177451987828
Author(s):  
Roberto Oleas ◽  
Carlos Robles-Medranda

Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate is considered as the first-line alternative for gastric varices treatment; however, the incidence of adverse events supports the endoscopic ultrasound–guided approach. Endoscopic ultrasound–guided interventions are a safe and feasible technique for the injection of sclerosants, cyanoacrylate, thrombin, and the deployment of coils into targeted vessels. This review article aims to offer an overview of the role of endoscopic ultrasound–guided vascular therapy and present the available data regarding endoscopic ultrasound–guided management of gastrointestinal bleeding and other vascular therapies. The available data have shown the superiority of endoscopic ultrasound–guided endovascular therapy over the endoscopic technique, which supports the implementation of endoscopic ultrasound–guided therapy in therapeutical algorithms and guidelines. Regarding whether injecting cyanoacrylate, the deployment of coils, or combined therapy, we recommend the endoscopic ultrasound–guided combined therapy in patients with gastric varices due to the high eradication rate with lower rebleeding and reintervention rates. Multicenter worldwide studies are required to confirm the actual clinical applicability of endoscopic ultrasound–guided endovascular therapy and establish treatment algorithms. Endoscopic ultrasound offered a safe and effective alternative in the management of variceal and nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, with the implementation of new diagnostic and treatment options for various gastrointestinal conditions, representing a new territory for research and development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sławomir Kozieł ◽  
Katarzyna Pawlak ◽  
Łukasz Błaszczyk ◽  
Mateusz Jagielski ◽  
Anna Wiechowska-Kozłowska

Background and Aims: Gastric varices (GVs) occur in 20% of patients with portal hypertension. GVs are associated with a 65% risk of bleeding over the course of 2 years and have a mortality rate of up to 20%. The standard treatment for GVs is obliteration with cyanoacrylate (CYA). This study presents our experience with combined therapy (vascular coils and CYA) under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Methods: 16 patients (9 male and 7 female) were included into our study. Etiology of portal hypertension included: portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (31.0%), isolated splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) (25.0%), alcoholic cirrhosis (12.5%), hepatitis C cirrhosis (19.0%), and alcoholic cirrhosis with PVT (12.5%). Varices type GOV-2 were diagnosed in 8 patients, type IGV-1 and IGV-2 in 6 and 2 patients, respectively. Indications for treatment were based on endoscopic and endosonographic evaluations of GVs. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were also specified. Technique depended on the size of varices (different size of coils + CYA additionally). The results were based on the achievement of technical success, therapeutic effects, and number of adverse events. Average follow-up period was 327 days. Results: From January to August 2017, 16 patients were treated with EUS-guided obliteration of GVs using vascular coils only or coils with CYA injections. 6 (37.5%) and 10 (62.5%) patients underwent primary and secondary prophylaxis for hemorrhage, respectively. Technical success was achieved in 15 patients (94.0%). Mean numbers of implanted coils and CYA volume during one procedure were 1.7 and 2 mL, respectively. Therapeutic success was achieved in all patients treated with the combination. There were no serious complications such as embolization or death due to the procedure. Three patients (19.0%) had transient abdominal pain and two (12.5%) had transient fever. 1 patient had clinical symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Based on our retrospective research we have concluded, that EUS-guided implantation of intravascular coils combined with cyanoacrylate injections is an effective method of treatment with an acceptable number of complications.


Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (09) ◽  
pp. 727-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoquan Huang ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Lifen Wang ◽  
Mei Xiao ◽  
Liyuan Ni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Oxaliplatin, used as first-choice treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), induces sinusoidal endothelial injury and portal hypertension. This study investigated the characteristics of oxaliplatin-induced portal hypertension and evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic management of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Methods We performed a retrospective, multicenter, case-control study between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy after CRC surgery and presented with portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices were compared with consecutive patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhotic portal hypertension receiving endoscopic treatment for variceal bleeding. Results 39 patients with oxaliplatin-induced portal hypertension were identified, 35 of whom had a history of variceal bleeding. The median period between start of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and the occurrence of varices was 50.4 months (n = 39). A total of 26 patients with oxaliplatin-related portal hypertension and 230 patients with hepatitis B-related portal hypertension underwent endoscopic treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the 1-year rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the oxaliplatin group than in the hepatitis B group (43.3 % vs. 19.0 %, P = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was an independent factor for 3-year rebleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.24–4.87; P = 0.01) and 3-year overall mortality (HR 9.43, 95 %CI 2.32–38.31; P = 0.002). Conclusions Oxaliplatin-related portal hypertension was characterized by massive ascites, splenomegaly, gastric varices, concomitant arterioportal fistula, and relatively normal liver function. Endoscopic treatment to prevent variceal rebleeding in these patients was unsatisfactory compared with endoscopic treatment for hepatitis B-related portal hypertension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document