Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Review

Author(s):  
Caren Liviskie ◽  
Christopher McPherson ◽  
Caitlyn Luecke

AbstractMany critically ill patients suffer from delirium which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data about the incidence, symptoms, or treatment of delirium in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Risk factors for delirium are common in the PICU including central nervous system immaturity, developmental delay, mechanical ventilation, and use of anticholinergic agents, corticosteroids, vasopressors, opioids, or benzodiazepines. Hypoactive delirium is the most common subtype in pediatric patients; however, hyperactive delirium has also been reported. Various screening tools are validated in the pediatric population, with the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) applicable to the largest age range and able to detect signs and symptoms consistent with both hypo- and hyperactive delirium. Treatment of delirium should always include identification and reversal of the underlying etiology, reserving pharmacologic management for those patients without symptom resolution, or with significant impact to medical care. Atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) should be used first-line in patients requiring pharmacologic treatment owing to their apparent efficacy and low incidence of reported adverse effects. The choice of atypical antipsychotic should be based on adverse effect profile, available dosage forms, and consideration of medication interactions. Intravenous haloperidol may be a potential treatment option in patients unable to tolerate oral medications and with significant symptoms. However, given the high incidence of serious adverse effects with intravenous haloperidol, routine use should be avoided. Dexmedetomidine should be used when sedation is needed and when clinically appropriate, given the positive impact on delirium. Additional well-designed trials assessing screening and treatment of PICU delirium are needed.

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristineide dos Anjos ◽  
Fátima Helena do Espírito Santo ◽  
Liliane Faria da Silva ◽  
Amanda Danielle Resende Silva Sousa ◽  
Fernanda Garcia Bezerra Góes

Objetivou-se descrever a percepção do familiar da criança com câncer quanto a sua chegada e presença na unidade deterapia intensiva pediátrica. Pesquisa descritiva, de natureza qualitativa, realizada na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátricade um hospital especializado em oncologia, de outubro a novembro de 2014. Participaram de entrevista semiestruturada10 familiares de crianças. Da análise de conteúdo resultaram as seguintes categorias: o itinerário da criança e seu familiardos primeiros sinais e sintomas até a chegada à unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica e a percepção do familiar da criançacom câncer quanto a sua presença na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Conclui-se que a chegada da criança comcâncer e do seu familiar é permeada por medo, incertezas e dúvidas, contudo, a presença da família promove à criançaproteção, calma, segurança, amor e carinho. Ademais, os familiares passam a compartilhar alguns cuidados com a equipede enfermagem.Palavras-chaves: Família, Criança Hospitalizada, Câncer, Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Enfermagem Oncológica. ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to describe the perception of the relative of the child with cancer regarding their arrivaland presence in the pediatric intensive care unit. Qualitative descriptive research carried out in the pediatric intensive careunit of a hospital specialized in oncology, from October to November 2014. Ten family members of children participatedin a semi-structured interview. Content analysis resulted in the following categories: the itinerary of the child and his /her relative from the first signs and symptoms until arrival at the pediatric intensive care unit and the perception of therelative of the child with cancer regarding their presence in the pediatric intensive care unit. It is concluded that the arrivalof the child with cancer and his family is permeated by fear, uncertainties and doubts, however, the presence of the familypromotes the child protection, calmness, security, love and affection. In addition, the relatives begin to share some carewith the nursing team.Keywords: Family, Hospitalized Child, Cancer, Pediatric Intensive Care Units, Oncology Nursing


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harsheen Kaur ◽  
James M. Naessens ◽  
Andrew C. Hanson ◽  
Karen Fryer ◽  
Michael E. Nemergut ◽  
...  

Objective: No risk prediction model is currently available to measure patient’s probability for readmission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This retrospective case–control study was designed to assess the applicability of an adult risk prediction score (Stability and Workload Index for Transfer [SWIFT]) and to create a pediatric version (PRediction Of PICU Early Readmissions [PROPER]). Design: Eighty-six unplanned early (<48 hours) PICU readmissions from January 07, 2007, to June 30, 2014, were compared with 170 random controls. Patient- and disease-specific data and PICU workload factors were compared across the 2 groups. Factors statistically significant on multivariate analysis were included in the creation of the risk prediction model. The SWIFT scores were calculated for cases and controls and compared for validation. Results: Readmitted patients were younger, weighed less, and were more likely to be admitted from the emergency department. There were no differences in gender, race, or admission Pediatric Index of Mortality scores. A higher proportion of patients in the readmission group had a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category in the moderate to severe disability category. Cases and controls did not differ with respect to staff workload at discharge or discharge day of the week; there was a much higher proportion of patients on supplemental oxygen in the readmission group. Only 2 of 5 categories in the SWIFT model were significantly different, and although the median SWIFT score was significantly higher in the readmissions group, the model discriminated poorly between cases and controls (area under the curve: 0.613). A 7-category PROPER score was created based on a multiple logistic regression model. Sensitivity of this model (score ≥12) for the detection of readmission was 81% with a positive predictive value of 0.50. Conclusion: We have created a preliminary model for predicting patients at risk of early readmissions to the PICU from the hospital floor. The SWIFT score is not applicable for predicting the risk for pediatric population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-489
Author(s):  
R. Zachary Thompson ◽  
Lori McDonald ◽  
Keegan Ziemba ◽  
Joseph D. Tobias ◽  
Claire A. Stewart

Dexmedetomidine use in the pediatric intensive care unit has increased in recent years. Reports of dexmedetomidine-associated drug fever have been described in adult patients; however, this has not been reported in the pediatric population. We report a case of persistent fever that resolved with the discontinuation of dexmedetomidine and successful transition to clonidine. This is the first report of dexmedetomidine drug fever in a pediatric patient.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Tobias, MD

This retrospective study aims to report on the use of dexmedetomidine to treat opioid withdrawal following sedation during mechanical ventilation in a cohort of infants. Seven infants in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care center, ranging in age from three to 24 months (12.4 ± 8.2 months) and in weight from 4.6 to 15.4 kgs (9.9 ± 4.2 kgs), had received a continuous fentanyl infusion, supplemented with intermittent doses of midazolam for sedation, during mechanical ventilation. Withdrawal was documented by a Finnegan score ³ 12. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg/hr, followed by an infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/hr.Dexmedetomidine effectively controlled the signs and symptoms of withdrawal in the seven patients. Subsequent Finnegan scores were £ 7 at all times (median 4, range 1 to 7). Two patients required a repeat of the loading dose and an increase of the infusion to 0.7 mg/kg/hr. These two patients had received higher doses of fentanyl than the other five patients (8.5 ± 0.7 versus 4.6 ± 0.5 mg/kg/hr, p < 0.0005). No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects related to dexmedetomidine were noted.This report involves the largest cohort of patients to receive dexmedetomidine in the treatment of withdrawal following opioid and benzodiazepine sedation during mechanical ventilation. We conclude that dexmedetomidine offers a viable option for such issues in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document