Evaluation of Weight-Management Programs and the impact of the return ratio of questioning by the example of a medically supervised weight-management program for primary care setting

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kruschitz ◽  
H Lothaller ◽  
TC Wascher ◽  
PM Liebmann ◽  
WJ Schnedl ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 3255
Author(s):  
Sami Ibrahim ◽  
Connor Bracy ◽  
Kimberly Dowdell

2021 ◽  
pp. 136749352110375
Author(s):  
Zina C Mc Sweeney ◽  
Morgan D McSweeney ◽  
Shirley H Huang ◽  
Samareh G Hill

Childhood obesity is a major public health concern. However, predictors of successful outcomes for patients treated at multidisciplinary community hospital–based pediatric weight management programs remain poorly understood. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate 633 pediatric patients from ages 2 to 18 at a tertiary pediatric weight management program in 2018. Predictors were evaluated in univariate comparisons, and significant variables were included in a linear regression analysis to identify factors associated with improvements in body mass index relative to the age- and sex-specific 95th percentile body mass index (%BMIp95). We found that male sex and increased number of clinical visits were independently and significantly associated with reductions in %BMIp95. Baseline %BMIp95, age, preferred language, and insurance status were not significant predictors of outcomes. A total of 398 (63%) patients experienced a decrease in %BMIp95 from baseline to follow-up. One quarter (24.8%) of patients experienced a decrease in %BMIp95 of at least 5%, a threshold associated with cardiometabolic improvements. Further, we observed significant improvements in cholesterol, triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, HbA1c, and waist circumference. These findings support a potential need for sex- and gender-tailored care as well as the benefits of increased access to pediatric weight management programs.


Obesity Facts ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renate Kruschitz ◽  
Sandra Wallner-Liebmann ◽  
Harald Lothaller ◽  
Maria Luger ◽  
Bernhard Ludvik

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Uyen Le-Jenkins ◽  
Diana Cartagena ◽  
Michelle Renaud ◽  
Tina Guston

BackgroundChildhood obesity is a growing epidemic of great concern for our nation, including pediatric populations treated at military treatment facilities.ObjectiveThis study aims to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care–based structured weight management program in a sample of pediatric patients with obesity at a military treatment facility.MethodsThis study was a retrospective chart review of patients enrolled in the All About Me Program (AAMP) from August 1, 2011, through July 10, 2012. Baseline demographics, 5-2-1-0 behavioral targets, and anthropometric measures were obtained from 54 enrollees. Pre- and post-program weight, body mass index (BMI) percentile, and 5-2-1-0 behavioral targets were compared for 20 patients who completed the program which consisted of a total of five visits over 3 months.ResultsParticipants showed a significant reduction in their BMI, improvement in daily servings of fruits and vegetables, reduction in recreational screen time from baseline, improvement in daily physical activity, and reduction in consumption of sugary beverages.ConclusionsThese preliminary findings are a promising indicator that primary care–based obesity interventions may be effective for the management and treatment of pediatric obesity.Implications for NursingThis evidence-based toolkit provides a practical point-of-care guidance on the prevention, assessment, and treatment of childhood obesity and can be easily implemented in other primary care settings.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. A364
Author(s):  
N Triki ◽  
S Shani ◽  
D Rabinovich-Protter ◽  
D Mossinson ◽  
E Kokia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carlander ◽  
Marc Hoeglinger ◽  
Maria Trottmann ◽  
Birgitta Rhomberg ◽  
Cornelia Caviglia ◽  
...  

Objectives Structured treatment programs have been recommended for management of patients with chronic conditions to overcome ill-coordinated care. We aimed to evaluate a disease management program (DMP) with for diabetes mellitus in Switzerland. Methods We performed a prospective observational study with a propensity score-matched usual care control group from a claims database. We included type-1 and type-2 diabetes patients from a primary care setting. The DMP (intervention) comprised a structured treatment approach with an individual treatment plan, treatment goals and an interprofessional team approach. Our outcome comprehensive measures included quality of life (QOL: EQ-5D-5L), pre-defined indicators for diabetes guideline adherence, number of used services and direct medical costs. We applied a difference-in-difference (DID) approach to compare DMP with usual care (follow-up 1 year). Costs were calculated with non-parametric bootstrapping (2017 Swiss Francs, CHF; conversion rate to Euros: 0.85) from a third-party payer perspective (Swiss health care insurance). Results QOL in a sub-sample of 80 patients did not change during follow-up (mean utility 0.89 at baseline and follow-up; p=0.94). Guideline adherence showed slight improvements for DMP. For example, non-adherence (baseline DMP: 19%) decreased in the DMP group by -3 %-points (DID; 95%-CI: -0.07 to 0.01) but not in the control group. A general trend emerged, though mostly not statistically significant, with less used services in the DMP group compared to the control group. Costs increased in both groups during follow-up, but the increase was higher in the control group (DID, mean total costs per patient per year: CHF -950.00 [95%-CI: -1959.53 to 59.56]). Such a negative difference-in-difference estimate in favor of DMP also emerged for cost sub-categories (e.g. costs for inpatient and outpatient care). Conclusions The structured treatment program under evaluation is a promising approach to improve diabetes care in a Swiss primary care setting but more follow-up data are needed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg Simione ◽  
Holly M. Frost ◽  
Rachel Cournoyer ◽  
Fernanda Neri Mini ◽  
Jackie Cassidy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Connect for Health is an evidence-based weight management program with clinical- and family-facing components for delivery in pediatric primary care for families of children ages 2 to 12 years. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide formative work prior to national implementation. The purpose of this study was to describe the process and results of stakeholder engagement and program adaptation.Methods: We used mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to iteratively adapt and optimize the program by assessing needs and perspectives of clinicians and parents, as well as contextual barriers, facilitators and organizational readiness for the uptake of the proposed program tools and implementation strategies. We conducted interviews with primary care clinicians from four health care organizations in Boston, MA, Denver, CO, and Greenville, SC and used principles of immersion-crystallization for qualitative analyses. We also conducted surveys of parents of children with a body mass index ≥ 85th percentile.Results: We reached thematic saturation after 52 clinician interviews. Emergent themes representing the CFIR domains of intervention characteristics, outer and inner setting, and process included: (1) importance of evidence-based clinical decision support tools that integrate into the workflow and do not extend visit time; (2) developing resources that respond to family’s needs; (3) using multimodal delivery options for family resources; (4) addressing childhood obesity while balancing competing demands; (5) emphasizing patient care rather than documentation and establishing sustainability plans; and (6) offering multiple training methods that incorporate performance feedback. Of the parents surveyed (n=400), approximately 50% were Spanish-speaking and over 75% reported an annual income < $50,000. Parents affirmed the importance of addressing weight management during well-child visits, being provided with referrals and resources, and offering multiple methods for resource delivery. Decisions about program modifications were made at the program and healthcare-system level and based on stakeholder engagement findings. Modifications included cultural, geographic, and target audience adaptations, as well as varied resource delivery options. Conclusions: To ensure the fit between the Connect for Health program and national implementation settings, adaptations were systematically made through engagement of clinician and parent stakeholders to support adoption, sustainability, and health outcomes. Trial Registration: NCT04042493


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document