The ethical comparison is based on data on relationships in society, on conflicts, on racism and crises, on unethical major political steps (false demonstration of white powder as the beginning of a major war), data on environmental ethics (including the new ethics of empathy), etc. The environmental comparison is based on data on the nature of countries, its conservation, pollution, the socio-environmental sustainability (elasticity) of countries, the environmental footprint, the use of renewable resources, etc. In environmental ethics and ethical ecology it is necessary to take into account ethical interaction with the entire multiple world of nature. The new ecological ethics of empathy, empathy, proposed by the author differs from others in that it is more objective and multiple. Performed ethically - ecological comparison of the two countries on a number of important indicators gives grounds to speak about advantage of the Russian Federation, associated with both objective factors (large size of the territory, area of forests, reserves of fresh water, etc.), and with subjective (less environmental footprint, non-use of nuclear weapons, not the use of destruction of nature to punish the enemy, the absence of racism, the lack of unethical use of lies for the sake of solving the problems of war, public health, etc.).
Ending nuclear weapons before they end us: current challenges and paths to avoiding a public health catastrophe
