Wave-Induced Dynamic Response in a Poroelastic Seabed

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (9) ◽  
pp. 06018008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guocai Wang ◽  
Shengli Chen ◽  
Qianqian Liu ◽  
Yong Zhang
Author(s):  
Knut Vedeld ◽  
Håvar Sollund ◽  
Olav Fyrileiv

Pipeline free span design has evolved from basic avoidance criteria in the DNV ’76 rules [1], to fatigue and ultimate limit state considerations in Guideline no. 14 [2]. Modern multimode, multi-span free span design is predominantly performed according to DNV-RP-F105 [3]. In 2006, the latest revision of DNV-RP-F105 [3] was written as a direct result of extensive research, performed due to significant free span challenges in the Ormen Lange pipeline project. DNV-RP-F105 was at the time, and still is, the only pipeline design code giving contemporary design guidance for vortex induced vibrations (VIV) and direct wave loading design for pipelines in free spans. The last revision of DNV-RP-F105 included a few, but highly important advances, particularly the consideration for multi-mode and multi-span pipeline dynamic response behavior. In the 10 years that have followed, no breakthroughs of similar magnitude have been achieved for pipeline free spans, but a large number of incremental improvements to existing calculation methods, and some novel advances in less critical aspects of VIV understanding have been made. As a result, DNV-RP-F105 has recently been revised to account for these advances, which include improved frequency-domain analyses of wave-induced fatigue, a new response model for cross-flow VIV in low Keulegan-Carpenter (KC) regimes in pure waves, new analytical methods for dynamic response calculations of short spans in harsh conditions, and extensive guidance on how to apply the recommended practice for assessment of fatigue and extreme environmental load effects on curved structural members such as spools, jumpers and manifold flexloops. This paper gives an overview of most of the important changes and updates to the new revision of DNV-RP-F105. Case studies are used to demonstrate the importance and effects of the changes made, and to some extent how the revision of DNV-RP-F105 can enhance its applicability and ease of use.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Rae Cho ◽  
Ki-Chul Han ◽  
Soon-Wook Hwang ◽  
Choon-Soo Cho ◽  
O-Kaung Lim

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 1522-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B.C. Ulker ◽  
M.S. Rahman ◽  
M.N. Guddati

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titi Sui ◽  
Yu Jin ◽  
Zhaojun Wang ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Jian Shi

The seabed is usually non-homogeneous in the real marine environment, and its response to the dynamic wave loading is of great concern to coastal engineers. Previous studies on the simulation of a non-homogeneous seabed response have mostly adopted a vertically layered seabed, in which homogeneous soil properties are assumed in the governing equations for one specified layer. This neglects the distribution gradient terms of soil property, thus leading to an inaccurate evaluation of the dynamic response of a non-homogeneous seabed. In this study, a numerical model for a wave-induced 3D non-homogeneous seabed response is developed, and the effects of the soil property distribution gradient on the wave-induced response of a non-homogeneous seabed are numerically investigated. The numerical model is validated, and the results of the present simulation agree well with those of previous studies. The validated model is applied to simulate an ideal two-dimensional (2D) vertical non-homogeneous seabed. The model is further applied to model the practical wave-induced dynamic response of a three-dimensional (3D) non-homogeneous seabed around a mono-pile. The difference in pore pressure and soil effective stresses due to the soil distribution gradient is investigated. The effects of the soil distribution gradient on liquefaction are also examined. Results of this numerical study indicate that (1) pore pressure decreases while soil effective stresses increase (the maximum difference of the effective stresses can reach 68.9 % p 0 ) with a non-homogeneous seabed if the distribution gradient terms of soil properties are neglected; (2) the effect of the soil property distribution gradient terms on the pore pressure becomes more significant at the upper seabed, while this effect on the soil effective stresses is enhanced at the lower seabed; (3) the effect of the soil distribution gradient on the seabed response is greatly affected by the wave reflection and diffraction around the pile foundation; and (4) the soil distribution gradient terms can be neglected in the evaluation of seabed liquefaction depth in engineering practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 924-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Yun Chen ◽  
Guo-Xing Chen ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Chen-Cong Liao ◽  
Hong-Mei Gao

2021 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 109436
Author(s):  
Hongchang Zhou ◽  
Xiangshao Kong ◽  
Yiwen Wang ◽  
Cheng Zheng ◽  
Zhiyong Pei ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document