Experimental Evaluation of an Innovative Isolation System for a Lightweight Steel Moment Frame Building at E-Defense

Author(s):  
Nhan D. Dao ◽  
Keri L. Ryan ◽  
Eiji Sato ◽  
Taichiro Okazaki ◽  
Stephen A. Mahin ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-315
Author(s):  
Robert E. Shaw

FEMA-353, Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic Applications, contains numerous provisions related to the materials, details, quality, and inspection of steel moment-frame buildings in seismic regions. These provisions continue to evolve as industry standards and practices are reviewed, modified, and adopted to meet the need for good seismic performance. Those writing project specifications must remain current with new industry developments and standards.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 927-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce F. Maison ◽  
Kazuhiko Kasai ◽  
Gregory Deierlein

A welded steel moment-frame building is used to assess performance-based engineering guidelines. The full-scale four-story building was shaken to collapse on the E-Defense shake table in Japan. The collapse mode was a side-sway mechanism in the first story, which occurred in spite of a strong-column and weak-beam design. Computer analyses were conducted to simulate the building response during the experiment. The building was then evaluated using the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE-41) and Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (FEMA-351) for the collapse prevention performance level via linear and nonlinear procedures. The guidelines had mixed results regarding the characterization of collapse, and no single approach was superior. They mostly erred on the safe side by predicting collapse at shaking intensities less than that in the experiment. Recommendations are made for guideline improvements.


PCI Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Nazarpour ◽  
Parsa Monfaredi ◽  
Abdoreza S. Moghadam

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg Haskell

A 1985 steel moment frame is seismically upgraded using passive energy dissipation, without adding stiffness to the system. The design and analysis techniques for sizing the Velocity Braces™ and their impact on the demand capacity ratios are reviewed. The structure was built in the San Francisco Bay Area in compliance with the 1985 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The moment frame contains the classic pre-Northridge nonductile moment connection, complete with weld backup bars left attached. Nonlinear time-history analysis procedures were implemented to verify the demand capacity ratios at the critical beam-column connections. Flexural demand capacity ratios of .6 achieve elastic behavior in the design basis earthquake with R=1.0. The response spectra of the time history chosen for design exceed the requirements of the 1997 UBC Zone 4. Torsional response to earthquake excitation is minimized by strategic placement of nonlinear viscous dampers. Nonlinear dampers that reduce the flexural demand on joints and control interstory drift without inelastic excursions of the beam flanges are achieved. Floor spectral accelerations and maximum drift limits are reduced to be consistent with immediate occupancy performance. The damper driver mechanism, being velocity driven, reduces moment frame demands and allows flexibility in configuration.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 951-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce F. Maison ◽  
Tom H. Hale

The two-story welded steel moment-frame (WSMF) essential services building had columns severed by the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Two of eight columns suffered fracture across both flanges and panel zones in the WSMFs oriented in the north-south direction. Building and connection damage are described; computer models of the building are formulated and used in a damage correlation exercise that aids in damage interpretation; and a calibrated model is used as the basis of special studies. Factors contributing to the severed columns appear to be column-steel low-fracture toughness, panel zone detailing, and panel-zone shear yielding. Using FEMA-351 guidelines, the as-built as well as the Northridge-damaged structure pass the global collapse prevention drift criterion and fail the local collapse prevention drift criterion. The results provide insight regarding the seismic safety of buildings having similar conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document