Probability of Plastic Collapse Failure

1969 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 1743-1761
Author(s):  
James L. Jorgenson ◽  
John E. Goldberg
2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-Kui Zhu ◽  
Brian N. Leis

This paper investigates plastic collapse failure behavior and analytical assessment methods for unequal wall transition joints in transmission pipelines. The objective is to (i) validate the plastic-collapse-based code requirements that were determined by the early lower-strength pipes and (ii) develop an effective method for assessing plastic collapse failure of unequal wall joints involving modern high-strength pipes. Detailed finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate the failure behavior of transition joints and the effects of geometry, including weld taper angle, mismatched diameter and location, and material parameters, including the steel grade, mechanical property, yield-to-tensile strength (Y∕T) ratio, and anisotropy. Numerical results show that the wall-thickness mismatch and tensile-strength mismatch are the two first-order parameters that control the plastic collapse failure behavior of unequal wall transition joints. Based on these first-order parameters, an analytic solution is formulated to predict burst pressure at plastic collapse as a function of the pipe geometry, material tensile and hardening properties for both end-opened and end-capped pipes in reference to the plastic instability and finite strain theory. A plastic collapse criterion and the corresponding plastic collapse assessment diagram (PCAD) are then developed as a function of the wall-thickness mismatch and tensile-strength mismatch conditions to ensure that plastic collapse failure would occur in the thinner wall, with higher strength pipe. General procedures to use PCAD for assessing the plastic collapse failure of unequal wall joints are outlined. Application of PCAD indicates that high-strength pipeline grades with high Y∕T ratios can be safely used beyond current code limitations on the wall-thickness mismatch of transition joints for a wide range of strength mismatch.


Author(s):  
Xian-Kui Zhu ◽  
Brian N. Leis

This paper presents the results of extensive numerical and analytical analyses considering the many differences in the flow properties of today’s steels with a view to determine if the code design basis developed for early steels remains appropriate in light of these changes. These analyses involved parametric study of steel grade, tensile strength, yield-to-tensile (Y/T) strength ratio, and joint geometry, for a range of transitions within as well as beyond current ASME code allowables. The numerical results indicate that the plastic-collapse failure conditions of unequal wall joints are controlled by the pipe or fitting remote to the weld, as would occur for high-quality slightly over-matched welds. Mismatch location, taper angle and anisotropy of unequal wall joints have limited influence on such failures. Based on trends in these results, a closed-form plastic collapse solution to predict internal pressure was developed as the pipe geometry, material hardening and tensile properties for both end opened and end capped pressurized pipes in reference to deformation instability, finite strain theory and deformation theory of plasticity. A plastic collapse criterion and the corresponding plastic collapse assessment diagram (PCAD) were then developed as a function of the wall thickness and tensile strength mismatch conditions to ensure plastic collapse failure in the thinner-wall, higher strength line pipe. General procedures to use the PCAD are outlined in this paper. Application of PCAD indicates that the high yield strength grades with high Y/T can be used within as well as beyond current code limitations on the transition wall-thickness mismatch for a wide range of strength mismatch.


Author(s):  
Gregory W. Brown ◽  
Lucie Parietti ◽  
Brian Rose ◽  
Ted L. Anderson

API 579-1/ASME FFS-1[1] Part 5 (2007 edition) contains procedures for assessing local metal loss based on failure by plastic collapse. Equation (5.10) defines “acceptable” tip radii for grooves to ensure a plastic collapse failure mode. Grooves failing the radius check must be treated as a crack-like flaws. The validity of Equation (5.10) is questionable, and it may be excessively conservative. This paper presents new rules for groove assessment based on brittle and ductile failure models. Computation of the Weibull stress using finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to determine the minimum groove radius required to eliminate the possibility of cleavage fracture. The Bao-Wierzbicki ductile failure model was used with FEA to evaluate burst pressure and to determine a new groove radius criterion defining the plastic collapse regime, allowing categorization as metal loss. Groove-like flaws categorized as neither sharp cracks nor as metal loss are evaluated using an effective toughness concept. This concept quantifies the difference in fracture response between a sharp crack and a notch with a finite tip radius. The upcoming 2016 API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 rules remove the excessive conservatism found in Part 5 of the 2007 edition and avoid the abrupt transition between crack and metal loss assessment types based on groove radius.


1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.K. Gupta ◽  
G.L. Easwara Prasad ◽  
S.K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
David Horsley ◽  
Gery Bauman

Alternative girth weld defect acceptance criteria implemented in major international codes and standards vary significantly. The requirements for welding procedure qualification and the allowable defect size are often very different among the codes and standards. The assessment procedures in some of the codes and standards are more adaptive to modern micro-alloyed TMCP steels, while others are much less so as they are empirical correlations of test data available at the time of the standards creation. A major effort funded jointly by the US Department of Transportation and PRCI has produced a comprehensive update to the girth weld defect acceptance criteria. The newly proposed procedures have two options. Option 1 is given in an easy-to-use graphical format. The determination of allowable flaw size is extremely simple. Option 2 provides more flexibility and generally allows larger flaws than Option 1, at the expense of more complex computations. Option 1 also has higher fracture toughness requirements than Option 2, as it is built on the concept of plastic collapse. In comparison to some existing codes and standards, the new procedures (1) provide more consistent level of conservatism, (2) include both plastic collapse and fracture criteria, and (3) give necessary considerations to the most frequently occurring defects in modern pipeline constructions. This paper provides an overview of the technical basis of the new procedures and validation against experimental test data.


Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Phuong H. Hoang ◽  
Bostjan Bezensek

When a crack is detected in a pipe during in-service inspection, the failure estimation method given in the codes such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI non-mandatory Appendix C or JSME S NA-1-2008 Appendix E-8 can be applied to assess the integrity of the pipe. In the current editions of these codes, the failure estimation method is provided for bending moment and pressure. Torsion load is assumed to be relatively small and is not considered in the method. In this paper, finite element analyses are conducted for 24-inch stainless steel pipe with a circumferential surface crack subjected to the combined bending and torsion moments, focusing on large and pure torsion moments. Based on the analysis results, a prediction method for plastic collapse under the combined loading conditions of bending and torsion is proposed for the entire range of torsion moments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document