Swarm intelligence for multi-objective optimization of synthesis gas production

Author(s):  
T. Ganesan ◽  
P. Vasant ◽  
I. Elamvazuthi ◽  
Ku Zilati Ku Shaari
2020 ◽  
pp. 014459872097663
Author(s):  
Tan Liu ◽  
Qinyun Yuan ◽  
Lina Wang ◽  
Yonggang Wang ◽  
Nannan Zhang

This paper establishes an error compensation multi-objective optimization model of oil-gas production process for optimizing these production indices, including overall oil production, overall water production and comprehensive energy consumption per ton of oil. In order to reduce the error between the model output and the actual value of comprehensive energy consumption per ton of oil, combining the mechanism model with least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) error model optimized by Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA), a hybrid model is established to predict the comprehensive energy consumption, in which the mechanism model is used to describe the overall characteristics of oil-gas production process, and LS-SVM error model is established to compensate the mechanism model error. Then, in order to improve the performance of Pareto non-dominated solutions, an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II with multi-strategy improvement (IMS-NSGA-II) is proposed to solve the error compensation multi-objective optimization model. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the the proposed optimization method are verified by the experiment results on some stand test problems and the optimization problem for the oil-gas production process in a block of an oil production operation area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (Number 2) ◽  
pp. 171-211
Author(s):  
Shaymah Akram Yasear ◽  
Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud

Multi-objective swarm intelligence (MOSI) metaheuristics were proposed to solve multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) that consists of two or more conflict objectives, in which improving an objective leads to the degradation of the other. The MOSI algorithms are based on the integration of single objective algorithms and multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach. The MOO approaches include scalarization, Pareto dominance, decomposition and indicator-based. In this paper, the status of MOO research and state-of-the-art MOSI algorithms namely, multi-objective particle swarm, artificial bee colony, firefly algorithm, bat algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, grey wolf optimizer, bacterial foraging and moth-flame optimization algorithms have been reviewed. These reviewed algorithms were mainly developed to solve continuous MOPs. The review is based on how the algorithms deal with objective functions using MOO approaches, the benchmark MOPs used in the evaluation and performance metrics. Furthermore, it describes the advantages and disadvantages of each MOO approach and provides some possible future research directions in this area. The results show that several MOO approaches have not been used in most of the proposed MOSI algorithms. Integrating other different MOO approaches may help in developing more effective optimization algorithms, especially in solving complex MOPs. Furthermore, most of the MOSI algorithms have been evaluated using MOPs with two objectives, which clarifies open issues in this research area.


Author(s):  
Rich Caruana ◽  
Yin Lou

Various challenges in real life are multi-objective and conflicting (i.e., alter concurrent optimization). This implies that a single objective is optimized based on another’s cost. The Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) issues are challenging but potentially realistic, and due to their wide-range application, optimization challenges have widely been analyzed by research with distinct scholarly bases. Resultantly, this has yielded distinct approaches for mitigating these challenges. There is a wide-range literature concerning the approaches used to handle MOO challenges. It is important to keep in mind that each technique has its pros and limitations, and there is no optimum alternative for cure searchers in a typical scenario. The MOO challenges can be identified in various segments e.g., path optimization, airplane design, automobile design and finance, among others. This contribution presents a survey of prevailing MOO challenges and swarm intelligence approaches to mitigate these challenges. The main purpose of this contribution is to present a basis of understanding on MOO challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document