Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 3. Cottonseed meal and hydroxymethyl-methionine

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 699 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Design Experiment ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

In experiment 1 six groups, each of 10 superfine Merino wethers were individually penned indoors and hand-fed chopped lucerne hay with either control pellets, cottonseed meal pellets (CSM) or cottonseed meal plus hydroxymethyl-methionine pellets (CSMEP). Following their shearing, the 6 groups in experiment 2 were hand-fed 1 of 3 chopped lucerne hay:oat rations [75: 25,50: 50,25: 75% (w/w)]. Each sheep was also fed either control pellets (25 g/day) or CSMEP pellets (75 g/day) in a cross-over design experiment. In both experiments, the rations were fed at maintenance level and were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa. In experiments 1 and 2, wool production was measured during a 4 and 6 month period respectively. In experiment 1, defaunation resulted in a 6% increase in clean wool production on the unsupplemented chopped lucerne hay ration. Inclusion of CSM and CSMEP pellets resulted in clean wool growth responses of 16% and 19% respectively. Unacceptable increases in fibre diameter were associated with the increased wool production. In experiment 2, the clean wool response to defaunation was highest (12%) on the 75% chopped lucerne hay ration, when the control pellet was fed. Inclusion of the CSMEP pellet resulted in clean wool growth responses of 0.73, 0.98 and 0.99 g/day in sheep fed on the 75,50 and 25% chopped lucerne hay rations respectively. The wool production responses due to the CSMEP pellet were associated with increases in fibre diameter (0.3 �m), length (4 mm/year) and length/diameter ratio (0.4 �m/day.�m) of the wool grown. It was concluded that CSMEP pellets are best fed with a mixed ration containing more grain than chopped lucerne hay. The wool growth response to feeding hydroxymethyl-methionine was considered uneconomic.

Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 4. Cottonseed meal, analogues of methionine and avoparcin

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 707 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

Ten groups, each of 6 superfine Merino wethers were individually penned indoors and hand-fed at maintenance level a ration of 70% oats and 30% chopped lucerne hay (w/w). The groups of sheep were fed 3 different supplementary pellets rotationally during three 9-week periods. Each group received 3 of the following 7 pellets: (1) control, (2) cottonseed meal (CSM), (3) CSM plus hydroxymethyl-methionine (MEP), (4) CSM plus methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA), (5) CSM plus avoparcin (AV), (6) CSM plus MEP plus AV, and (7) CSM plus MHA plus AV. The rations were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa. Wool production was measured during the 7-month period. Defaunation resulted in a 6.9% increase in greasy fleece weight and a 7.7% increase in clean wool production. Average wool fibre diameter increased by 0.6 pm in defaunated sheep. The clean wool growth responses compared with sheep fed the control pellets were 4, 5, 12, 0, 3 and 9% respectively for sheep fed pellets 2-7. The most cost-effective supplement was the CSM plus MHA pellet, which increased clean wool production by 0.5 glday compared with sheep fed the CSM pellet but did not significantly affect wool quality. It was concluded that supplements containing MHA could be economically fed to housed superfine Merino wethers ('Sharlea'), but MHA appears to be relatively inefficient in supplying methionine to the intestines.

Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 2. Methionine and protected methionine

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Previous Trial ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Protein Diets ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

In experiment 1, 6 groups, each of 10 superfine Merino wethers, were individually penned indoors and hand-fed oats, wheat straw and whole lupins, either alone or with 2 g/day of DL-methionine or 6.6 g/day of fatty acid coated methionine (Ketionin) for 23 weeks. Following shearing the 6 groups were hand-fed lucerne-chopped hay in experiment 2 either alone or with hydroxymethyl-methionine (Mepron) or Ketionin for 23 weeks. In both experiments the rations were fed at maintenance level and were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa following treatment in a previous trial. In experiment 1, defaunated sheep produced an additional 6.5%clean wool on the supplemented oats plus lupins rations. Inclusion of Ketionin in the ration of defaunated sheep resulted in an 11% increase in clean wool growth, without affecting wool quality. In experiment 2 defaunated sheep produced an additional 6% clean wool on the lucerne-chopped hay ration. No responses to defaunation occurred on the supplemented rations. Inclusion of both forms of protected methionine in the ration (providing 2 g methionine/sheep.day) resulted in 23% and 13% higher clean wool production in the faunated and defaunated sheep respectively. Fibre diameter of wool was increased by 0.7 pm in sheep receiving Mepron and 0-5 pm in sheep receiving Ketionin. The wool grown by suppiemented sheep remained suitable for the 'Sharlea' trade (< 17.5 �m). It is concluded that wool growth responds more to defaunation on high energy-low protein diets. Wool growth responses to supplementation with protected methionine were greater on 100% roughage diets than on high grain diets. Further study is needed before an optimal ration for superfine wool production is formulated.

Effects on wool production during pregnancy and lactation of twice daily abomasal supplementation with casein or methionine and cystine

1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (90) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Williams ◽  
RN Tyrrell ◽  
AR Gilmour
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Early Lactation ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Pregnancy And Lactation ◽  
Sulphur Amino Acids ◽  
Sorghum Grain

The responses in wool production of Merino ewes to abomasal supplements of casein (56 g day-1) and of a mixture of methionine and cystine were measured during late pregnancy and early lactation. The mixed supplement provided equal quantities of the sulphur amino acids as the casein. The ewes were offered sufficient quantities of a diet of sorghum grain/lucerne hay (in the ratio 7 : 3 by weight) to maintain maternal liveweight. During the final four weeks of pregnancy and the first six weeks of lactation, the cassin supplement increased wool growth (826 vs. 639 g cm-2 day-1). A similar response was observed for fibre diameter (1 9.7 vs. 18.5 pm : P < 0.05). Wool production and fibre diameter did not differ between the ewes supplemented with methionine and cystine and the control ewes during this same period. The ewes supplemented with methionine and cystine produced wool with the greatest sulphur content, and this trait was least in the wool from the control ewes (3.84 vs. 3.64 vs. 3.49: P < 0.05). We concluded that the availability of the sulphur amino acids was not primarily limiting wool production in pregnant/lactating ewes.

Factors differentiating between high and low wool producing sheep in western Queensland

1992 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1367
Author(s):  
DA Pritchard ◽  
PK O'Rourke
Keyword(s):  
Linear Growth ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Unit Surface Area ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Pasture Quality ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Commercial Flock

Four experiments were carried out to examine factors which may influence the phenotypic expression of wool growth. High wool producing sheep (HPS) and low wool producing sheep (LPS) were selected from a commercial flock and studied under grazing and controlled feeding conditions. Results are discussed in relation to management of HPS for increased wool production. In the paddock experiment, advantages to HPS in wool growth per unit surface area were least (7%) when pasture quality was low (11 g N/kg DM) and greatest (20%) when pasture quality was best (21 g N/kg DM). Despite the greater live weight of HPS compared with LPS (16%), the HPS produced 25% more clean wool per unit of live weight. Daily clean wool production was always greater in HPS than in LPS. Values ranged from 9.1 v. 7.5 g/day to 15.1 v. 11.6 g/day. During the period following the peak in nitrogen content of the pasture, HPS produced a greater volume of fibre than LPS (194 v. 167 8m3/dayx103), this difference being primarily associated with the greater fibre diameter of wool from HPS (25.4 v. 24.6 8m). In pen experiment 1, the efficiency of conversion of feed to wool was determined under controlled feeding conditions. Differences in wool growth between HPS and LPS at maintenance (M) and above maintenance (M+) were 21% and 49% respectively. Relative efficiency of conversion of feed to wool was 5% higher for HPS during the period immediately following the change in ration and greatest (38-48%) after sheep had made liveweight gains. Wool growth differences between HPS and LPS in pen experiment 2 could not be attributed to either differences in follicle density (66 v. 64 follicles/mm2) or the ratio of secondary to primary follicles (24 : 1 v. 22 : 1). The efficiency of retention of apparently absorbed nitrogen was similar (21.4 v. 20.8%) for HPS and LPS at below maintenance (M-) but differed at M-t (26.8 v. 11.7%). Rumen dry matter turnover time at M- was faster in HPS than in LPS (29.8 v. 38.4 h) but similar at M+ (30.4 v. 34.4 h). At M-, volumetric fibre production of HPS increased from 79 to 106 ,8m3/dayx 103 and from 59 to 75 ,8m3/day x103 for LPS following the subcutaneous administration of the sulfur containing amino acid methionine. These increases were associated with increases in both fibre diameter (1.5 8m) and fibre linear growth (42 8m/day) in HPS, but only linear growth (52 ,8m/day) in LPS. At M+, when basal wool growth was high, there was little increase in wool growth by either group following supplementary methionine. Wool growth responses to methionine were 25 and 19% for HPS and LPS respectively at M+ in pen experiment 3.

Wool growth responses to DL-methionine administration and factors affecting the value of supplementation

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 471 ◽  
Author(s):  
RGA Stephenson ◽  
GR Suter ◽  
CJ Howitt
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Rhodes Grass ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Net Return ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Treatment Analysis ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
The Cost

Wool growth responses to methionine administration were assessed using Peppin Merino wethers on various planes of nutrition. In experiment 1, sheep were fed 700 g/day of lucerne pellets to maintain liveweight. DL-methionine (5.8 g) administered subcutaneously resulted in 0.29 mg/cm2.day (36%) more wool (P<0.01) and a 2.5 �m (15.2%) increase in fibre diameter (P<0.05). In experiment 2, two levels (700 and 1400 g/day) of lucerne pellets were offered, with and without methionine administered subcutaneously (5.8 g). Main treatment analysis indicated a significant (P<0.01) effect of nutrition on wool growth and fibre diameter, with no effect of methionine, except for a reduction (P<0.05) in liveweight gain. Methionine administration was associated with a non-significant increase (39%) in wool growth for the 700 g diet and no change for the 1400 g diet. In experiment 3, two levels (1.75 and 2.5 g/day) of methionine were infused (4 h daily) when sheep were fed a submaintenance ration of Rhodes grass chaff, supplemented with nitrogen and sulfur. Significant (P<0.05) wool growth responses at both levels of methionine infusion were similar, with absolute (0.21 and 0.23 mg/cm2.day) and percentage (52 and 58%) increases for 1.75 and 2.5 g/day methionine treatments, respectively. Methionine administration only increased wool production at nutritional levels of liveweight maintenance or below when wool growth values for control treatments were 0.63,0.59 and 0.40 mg/cm2.day for experiments 1, 2 and 3. Fibre diameters of sheep in untreated groups were 16.4 and 18.8 pm for experiments 1 and 2. These wool growth and fibre diameter values are 25-40% below what might be expected for this strain of Merino. The values of positive correlations between wool growth and fibre diameter were increased with increased nutrition and the administration of methionine in experiment 2. This result and the nil response at high basal wool growth, together with the low potential net return on the cost of methionine, suggest that the use of methionine could be unprofitable.

Studies on the supplementary feeding of sheep consuming mulga (Acacia aneura). 5. The effect of cobalt and cottonseed meal supplementation

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (111) ◽  
pp. 404 ◽  
Author(s):  
NP McMeniman ◽  
DR Niven ◽  
D Crowther ◽  
RJW Gartner ◽  
GM Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Formaldehyde Treatment ◽  
Limiting Nutrient ◽  
Acacia Aneura ◽  
Sulfur Balance

In the first experiment designed to identify the deficiencies in mulga leaves, four groups of sheep were fed mulga and offered one of the following supplements; cobalt, sulfur, cobalt plus sulfur, and molasses. A fifth group acted as a control. All sheep received a phosphorus supplement. The cobalt supplement had no beneficial effect on liveweight or clean wool production. In contrast, the sulfur and molasses supplements significantly improved liveweight gain, clean wool production and sulfur balance. The liveweight and wool growth responses were more than twice as large in the sheep receiving a molasses supplement as in those receiving sulfur. In a second experiment, three groups of sheep on a diet of mulga leaves were supplemented with molasses and phosphorus and, in addition, two groups received 50 g/head.d of either formaldehyde treated or untreated cottonseed meal. Both cottonseed meal supplements significantly improved liveweight gain, but formaldehyde treatment of the meal had no additional effect. Under the conditions of the experiment rumen ammonia was a major limiting nutrient.

Liveweight and wool growth responses to a Mediterranean environment in three strains of Merino sheep

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Adams ◽  
J. R. Briegel
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Mediterranean Environment ◽  
Protein Loss ◽  
Broad Group ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Sources Of Variation

The present study examined changes in wool growth, liveweight, and body composition in groups of fine, medium, and broad wool Merino wethers grazed together at pasture in the highly seasonal Mediterranean environment, to determine the sources of variation in wool growth that may affect staple strength (SS). Seasonal changes in wool growth were measured using 6 dyebands placed at times of seasonal change in the nutrient supply from pasture, and liveweights were recorded fortnightly. Dilution of deuterated water was used to determine changes in body composition between the beginning of summer and the end of autumn. The sheep lost liveweight over this period, but loss of protein relative to fat over this period was unexpectedly high (7 : 1). The relative changes in liveweight, and loss of its components (fat and lean) during summer and autumn, were similar in all 3 groups, even though the Broad group was heavier than the other 2 genotypes at all times (P < 0·01). In contrast to the similar pattern of liveweight change, wool growth rates and changes in the fibre diameter were less variable throughout the year in the Broad group than the other 2 groups (P < 0·001). Stepwise regression indicated that the characteristics related to SS were standard deviation in fibre diameter (SDfd; P < 0·001), mean fibre diameter (P < 0·001), and variation in diameter within a 200-mm length of wool fibre (Sdfdwithin; P < 0·05). However, the relative importance of different factors for SS differed within each group. The most important factors were mean fibre diameter in the Fine group, the variation in fibre diameter along the staple (SDfdalong) in the Medium group, and the variation in diameter between fibres (SDfdbetween) in the Broad group. It is concluded that SS is a complex characteristic, depending on both the fibre diameter and several sources of variation in fibre diameter, all of which can differ among flocks. Protein loss made a disproportionate contribution to liveweight loss over summer and autumn, but the amino acids made available did not contribute substantially to wool growth or SS.

Effects of weaner nutrition on sire and flock rankings: a re-analysis of historical data

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1100
Author(s):  
B. J. McGuirk
Keyword(s):  
Growth Response ◽  
Historical Data ◽  
Scale Type ◽  
Genetic Merit ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Log Transformation ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Nutritional Effects ◽  
The 1950S ◽  
Fleece Weight

Early work in the 1950s on the wool growth response of sheep from diverse genotypes for wool production in response to varying planes of nutrition at pasture did not show the significant genotype × environment interactions exhibited in later pen studies with the same or very similar genotypes. However, this early study used a log-transformation on all traits to adjust nutritional effects for scale. Re-analysis of the original (i.e. untransformed) data shows that superior genetic merit for clean fleece weight, different sire progeny groups or selection flocks is more apparent when hogget ewes are fed a high plane of nutrition at pasture. However, only in the case of flocks was the interaction statistically significant, and this interaction was insignificant when data were either log-transformed, or when an appropriate test that accounts for scale-type effects was applied. When left untransformed, the data are, thus, in agreement with the subsequent pen studies that examined data on untransformed clean wool production.

The influence of abomasal supplements of methionine on wool growth of wheat-fed sheep

1974 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 919 ◽  
Author(s):  
PJ Reis ◽  
DA Tunks
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Blood Plasma ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Length Growth ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Abomasal Infusion ◽  
Mineral Mixture ◽  
In Blood Plasma

Sheep receiving a diet consisting solely of wheat (500 g/day), supplemented with a mineral mixture, were given abomasal infusions of varying amounts of DL-methionine (1.5–6.0 g/day) or of L-cystine (5 g/day). Other sheep received DL-methionine as a supplement to a roughage diet. All levels of methionine infused caused a decrease in the mass of wool grown by sheep consuming the wheat diet. This effect was greatest with 6 g methionine and was due mainly to a considerable depression of fibre diameter. Smaller amounts of methionine decreased fibre diameter and increased length growth rate. The infusion of methionine caused a considerable weakening of the wool grown by most of the sheep, with the result that a 'break' was observed in the fleece after about 1 week of methionine administration. This effect occurred with all levels of methionine but was more pronounced with 6 g/day. The abomasal infusion of cystine (5 g/day) caused little change in the mass of wool grown, but fibre diameter was decreased slightly. There were no appreciable effects on the strength of wool fibres and no wool was shed. Supplementation of the roughage diet (400 g/day) with methionine at 2 g/day stimulated wool growth, whereas with 6 or 10 g/day the mass of wool grown was unchanged but fibre diameter was markedly reduced. The strength of wool fibres was not markedly influenced by methionine infusions on this diet. The levels of amino acids in blood plasma and in abomasal digesta indicated that the mixture of amino acids absorbed was similar with both the roughage and the wheat diets.

Relationship of feed intake with cystine availability and wool growth in Merino wethers

1993 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 973 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Lee ◽  
AJ Williams
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Content ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Kinetics Model ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Standard Diet ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Irreversible Loss ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Saturation Kinetics ◽  
The Relationship

Two experiments were conducted to characterize the relationship between nutrient supply and the rate of wool growth. We concentrated on the accepted view that the rate of wool growth in Merino sheep is primarily limited by the availability of sulfur amino acids, which are largely determined by diet intake and its interaction with microbial fermentation in the reticulo-rumen. In the first experiment, the effects of variable intakes of two diets (one including 10% fishmeal) by sheep on the rate of irreversible loss of cystine and plasma cystine concentration were investigated. Nitrogen intake (N) was positively and linearly related to both the irreversible loss rate and the plasma concentration of cystine, with no effects of diet per se. In the second experiment, the same dietary treatments were imposed on 39 wethers for 16 weeks following an 8 week pre-experimental period. The monthly rates of wool growth, average fibre diameter and sulfur content of the wool were measured and related to various components of intake. The rate of wool growth responded in a positive curvilinear decreasing manner to changes in intake, the response requiring 2 months to stabilize. There was no significant effect of diet when daily intake was expressed as g N kg-0.75 liveweight. Including the covariate (wool growth when fed the standard diet), the quadratic linear model accounted for 90% of the total variation in wool growth. Responses in fibre diameter and its variation, and wool sulfur content were similar to those of wool growth, in that they were positive and did not equilibrate quickly. A saturation kinetics model of the relationship between daily N intake (g N kg 0.75 liveweight) and wool growth accounted for a similar proportion of the variation as did a linear (with quadratic term) model without the covariate. It is concluded that the saturation kinetics model may be useful for more comprehensive comparisons of both the genetic potential and the sensitivity of wool growth to environmental changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document