Supplementary feeding of young Merino sheep, grazing wheat stubble, with different amounts of lupin, oat or barley grain

1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
JB Rowe ◽  
G Brown ◽  
IG Ralph ◽  
J Ferguson ◽  
JF Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Barley Grain ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Winter Period ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Wheat Stubble ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Carry Over ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Supplement Intake

We examined the effect on liveweight change and wool growth of 3 grain supplements: lupins, oats and barley, fed at different levels to grazing Merinos. The animals (approx. 9 months of age, mean weight 29.3 kg) grazed wheat stubble (10 sheep/ha) from January to May and each supplement was fed at 0, 150, 300,450, 600, and 750 g/sheep.day (given twice per week). The digestibility of the stubble was high (stem 45%, leaf 58%) in February and decreased by May (stem 42%, leaf 49%). The unsupplemented animals received no supplementation until 1 May, when they reached a weight of 26.5 kg. The liveweight of the supplemented animals increased in relation to the amount of each supplement given. The conversion (kg supplement fed per kg liveweight gain, was 3.64 for lupins compared with 4.93 and 5.21 for the oats and barley respectively. There was an increase in the clean fleece weight (Y, kg) (November shearing) with increasing levels of each supplement (X, kg grain/sheep.day) described by the following equation; Y= 2.65 + 2.26X- 1,343, but there were no differences associated with the type of grain. As the level of supplement intake increased from 0 to 750 g/day, fibre diameter increased (P< 0.001) from 18.6 to 2 1.1 km, staple length increased (P < 0.01) from 73.5 to 86.7 mm and staple breaking force increased (P<0.05) from 17.4 to 26.1 N/ktex. There was no effect of type of supplement on parameters of wool quality. With all supplements there was an apparent carry-over effect of the summer-autumn feeding on wool growth during the winter period. For each additional 1 g of wool grown during the supplementary feeding period, approximately 1.4 g were measured in the final fleece weight.

Influence of grain supplements during winter on liveweight, mohair growth and mohair quality of weaner Angora goats

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 593 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. McGregor ◽  
R. Harris ◽  
G. Denney
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Barley Grain ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Pasture Management ◽  
Feeding Experiments ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Average Intake ◽  
Angora Goats ◽  
Fleece Weight

To identify methods to improve growth and mohair production of weaned Angora goats (mean liveweight 18–20 kg) during their first winter, two supplementary feeding experiments using whole-grain barley and lupins were conducted on a farm in southern New South Wales, in a region where weaner illthrift had been reported. Experiment 1 was a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with 16 replicate goats; two feeding levels (115 or 230 g/day of whole-barley grain) × two periods of feeding (4 or 8 weeks) + Control (grazing only). Experiment 2 had five treatments × 13 replicate goats; three treatments fed 230 g/day of whole-barley grain for periods of 2 or 3 months and two treatments fed a 50 : 50 mixture of lupin and barley grain at 350 g/day for 2 or 4 months. Goats were individually fed and then all returned together for grazing. There were no effects of feeding in Experiment 1 and variations of feeding 230 g/day of barley in Experiment 2 provided no benefit. Feeding lupin/barley for 4 months increased liveweight (gain 59 g/day), mohair production, mohair fibre diameter and the incidence of medullated fibre. About 25% of this ration was not eaten by eight goats, reducing treatment average intake to 295 g/day. By the end of spring, there was no difference in treatment liveweights. Regression constants indicated that for each 1 μm increase in mean fibre diameter, greasy fleece weight increased 35 g and for each 1 kg increase in pre-shearing liveweight, greasy fleece weight increased 26 g. The results show that Angora weaner goats can grow during winter, provided their energy and protein needs for growth are met. Improved pasture management and higher levels of supplementary feeding to weaned Angoras are indicated compared with current practices on farms in Australia.

Supplementation of young Merino sheep grazing annual pastures with lupin, barley grain, or silage

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 403 ◽  
Author(s):  
JJ Gardner ◽  
PT Doyle ◽  
JB Rowe ◽  
R Hetherington ◽  
P Spicer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Energy Levels ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Barley Grain ◽  
Sheep Grazing ◽  
Merino Sheep ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Metabolisable Energy ◽  
Staple Strength ◽  
Fleece Weight

We examined the effects on liveweight change and wool production of supplements of lupin, barley grain, or silage given to Merino weaners (age 5-7 months; starting weight about 30 kg) grazing dry annual pastures. In experiment 1, each supplement was offered at 5 rates (g/sheep.day): lupin, air-dry, 75-450; barley, air-dry, 80-480; silage, fresh, 430-2580. Sheep on all treatments gained weight in the first 29 days of supplementary feeding, with no effect of rate of supplementation (lupin 97 g/day; barley 57 g/day; silage 74 g/day). Those receiving no supplement also gained weight (40 g/day). Different supplements were not compared because the energy levels of lupin and barley were not measured. Over the next 48 days, liveweight changes increased (P<0.001) linearly with rate of feeding of lupin (25 � 2.1 g/100 g) and barley (12 � 0.8 g/100 g). The trend with silage (11 � 5.0 g/kg) was not significant. Taken over the 77 days, liveweight changes increased (P<0.01) linearly with rate of feeding for lupin (20 �. 1.8 g/100 g), barley (8 �. 1.7 g/100 g), and silage (10 �. 2 g/kg). There were no significant (P>0.05) differences associated with the rate of supplementation for annual clean fleece weight (lupin 3.43 kg, barley 3.37 kg, silage 3.30 kg) or mean fibre diameter of the 12-month fleece (lupin 22.2 �m, barley 22.6 �m, silage 22.1 �m). In experiment 2, sheep were given no supplement, lupin, barley, or lupin and barley mixtures (metabolisable energy ratio, 1:3,1:1,3:1). All supplements increased liveweight change (P<0.01) and clean wool growth rates (P<0.05) compared with no supplement. There was also a trend towards an increase in total wool grown by supplemented sheep (3.8 - 4.00 v. 3.73 kg). Liveweight change during the first 71 days of feeding increased (P<0.01) as the proportion of lupin in the supplement increased, with no effects in the final 70 days of supplementation. During supplementation, clean wool growth rate increased (P<0.05) as the proportion of lupin in the mixture increased, but there was no significant effect on the total amount of wool grown over 12 months or on mean fibre diameter. Supplements resulted in increased (P<0.001) staple strength when compared with controls (21-25 v. 14 N/ktex).

Supplementary feeding of Merino wethers grazing weed-free stubble pastures

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (110) ◽  
pp. 272 ◽  
Author(s):  
LG Butler
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Field Trial ◽  
Compensatory Growth ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Apparent Digestibility ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Wheat Stubble

A field trial was conducted in the Wimmera region of Victoria to investigate the effect of several supplements on 4-year-old Merino wethers grazing a weed-free wheat stubble for 3 months, The four treatments were: a control (no supplement), urea/molasses block, 100 g/head day-1 of lupin grain, and 2 g urea plus 0.5 g Na2SO4 l-1 in the drinking water. Twenty sheep per treatment were used, and liveweight change and wool growth were measured. Although all groups lost weight, the lupin group lost only 0.5 kg per head over the 3 months of the trial, and was 3.8 kg heavier (P <0.01) than the control group, while the urea/molasses group was 2.2 kg heavier (P <0.01) than the control group. There was no effect of the urea plus sulfur supplement in the drinking water on liveweight or wool production. The urea/molasses block did not affect wool production but lupin grain stimulated wool production by 0.08 kg (P <0.05). The sheep were weighed and shorn four and a half months after the trial (August), during which time all groups grazed together on green feed. The experimental liveweight differences had disappeared, apparently due to compensatory growth. In addition, a digestibility trial was conducted in an attempt to explain some of the field results. The treatments were designed to simulate those used in the field. Lupin grain stimulated intake by 129 g day-1 (P <0.05) but had no effect on apparent digestibility of straw. The treatment simulating the urea/ molasses block (urea plus sulfur plus sucrose in the drinking water) stimulated intake by 159 g day-l (P <0.05) and tended to increase digestibility (P > 0.05). It was concluded that supplementary feeding of Merino wethers grazing weed-free stubble is unlikely to be an economic farm practice.

Fibre diameter and staple strength of sheep selected for divergent clean fleece weight when subjected to an increase in intake or an increase in intake and diet change

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Friend ◽  
G. E. Robards
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Dietary Treatment ◽  
Diet Change ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Staple Strength ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Ad Libitum Feeding

Merino wethers with a high (fleece plus, Fl+) or low (fleece minus, Fl–) potential for wool growth were offered a restricted intake of either oat grain or lucerne chaff for 8 weeks followed by ad libitum lucerne chaff for 4 weeks. The Fl– sheep that were fed oats then lucerne had a lower (P < 0.05) intake during the first 2 weeks of ad libitum feeding than all other groups. Staple strength of Fl+ sheep (37.5 ± 2.2 N/ktex) was less (P < 0.05) than that of Fl– sheep (44.5 ± 2.4 N/ktex), and dietary treatment did not significantly affect staple strength. Wool growth rate was unaffected by dietary treatment, but was greater (P < 0.001) for Fl+ (6.4 ± 0.2 µg/mm2.day) than for Fl– (4.0 ± 0.2 µg/mm2.day) sheep. Along-fibre variation in diameter was greater (P < 0.001) in Fl+ (15.6 ± 0.5%) than in Fl– (9.9 ± 0.5%) sheep. Between-fibre variation in diameter was greater (P < 0.001) in Fl+ (16.5 ± 0.5%) than in Fl– (13.2 ± 0.5%) sheep, and between-fibre variation in diameter was affected (P < 0.05) by dietary treatment in Fl+ sheep. Staple strength was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with along-fibre variation in diameter (r = –0.48), and stepwise regression analysis indicated that along-fibre variation in diameter, wool growth rate during early restricted feeding, and minimum fibre diameter explained 63% of the variance in staple strength. The results are discussed in relation to the lower staple strength of Fl+ sheep.

Influence of liveweight, liveweight change, and diet on wool growth, staple strength, and fibre diameter in young sheep

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 269 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Masters ◽  
A. D. Peterson ◽  
G. Mata ◽  
S. M. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Management Strategy ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Experimental Period ◽  
Canola Meal ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Lupin Seed ◽  
Staple Strength ◽  
Wool Yield ◽  
Fleece Weight

The effects of initial liveweight, liveweight change, and composition of the diet on wool growth and staple strength in weaner sheep were investigated. Weaner wethers (64) were allocated to treatments in a factorial design (23). The factors were initial liveweight (heavy, 33 kg; light, 25 kg), liveweight change (fed at maintenance for 56 days, or 28 days at 0 ·6×maintenance then 28 days at 1·6×maintenance), and diet (lupin seed based diet or canola meal based diet). The heavier weaners grew approximately 1·9 g/day more wool than the light sheep during the experimental period and this resulted in a higher clean fleece weight (1·8 v. 1·4 kg), staple strength (37 v. 27·4 N/ktex), and fibre diameter (18·0 v. 17·4 µm). Substituting canola meal for lupin seed increased wool growth during the experiment and clean wool yield, but did not affect clean fleece weight or staple strength. The weaners fed to lose and then gain weight grew wool with a lower staple strength than the weaners fed to maintain weight through the experiment (28·6 v. 35·8 N/ktex), but there were no differences in any of the other fleece characteristics. The ratio of wool growth to dry matter intake (DMI) was higher in the sheep fed canola meal than those fed lupins (by approximately 1·5 g/kg DMI) and higher in weaners losing weight than those fed to maintain weight (by approximately 4·5 g/kg DMI). From a practical perspective, these results indicate that initial liveweight and liveweight change both influence staple strength and wool growth and need to be included in any management strategy to improve wool quality of young sheep.

Effect of selection for wool growth on seasonal patterns of yield, fibre diameter, and colour in Romney lines

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Wuliji ◽  
IL Weatherall ◽  
RN Andrews ◽  
KG Dodds ◽  
PR Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Seasonal Patterns ◽  
Control Line ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Growth Decline ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Staple Strength ◽  
Fleece Weight

Seasonal wool growth and associated wool characteristics were measured in a Romney line selected for high fleece weight and an unselected control line in 1990 and 1991. Both had a significant (P<0.01) decline in wool growth rate in winter compared with summer. The wool growth rate advantage (P<0.001) of the selected line over the control averaged 19 and 33% for ewes, and 24 and 36% for hoggets, in summer and winter, respectively. Staple strength, yield, and fibre diameter differences were closely associated with wool growth. Colour analysis showed no difference between lines in either brightness (Y) or yellowness (Y - Z). However, both the Y and Z values were lower in spring and summer, while Y - Z was highest in summer. The results suggest that selection for high fleece weight also improves major wool characteristics and reduces the relative winter wool growth decline in Romneys.

Supplementation of young sheep with lupins plus sulfur and a complete mineral mix

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
PT Doyle ◽  
RA Love ◽  
RH Dunlop ◽  
CL White
Keyword(s):  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Potassium Sulfate ◽  
Feeding Period ◽  
Merino Sheep ◽  
Mineral Supplements ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Average Intake ◽  
Staple Strength ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Mineral Lick

Young Merino sheep (7-8 months of age, weighing about 40.5 kg) were given weekly supplements of 1050 gfsheep of lupins, lupins coated with potassium sulfate (25 g/kg lupins), lupins and access to a mineral lick (offered at 175 g/sheep.week), or lupins coated with potassium sulfate and access to the lick. The sheep grazed an annual pasture at a stocking rate of 15 sheepha and were given the supplements between 14 December and 5 April. The amount of pasture on offer in mid December exceeded 3000 kg DMha but declined to 1500 kg DMha in late March.There were significant amounts of green feed present in December and March (>20% of pasture DM), a small amount in January, and no green feed in February. Despite this the percentage of sheep licking the minerals was over 70% in January , February; and March, with average intake being about 10 g/sheep.day. No significant differences occurred between treatments for liveweights of sheep during the feeding period or at shearing. Over the feeding period sheep lost weight at about 30 g/day. Neither the additional sulfur nor the mineral lick had any significant effects on fleece weight, mean fibre diameter of the fleece, staple length, or staple strength. Wool growth rates were not different between treatments during the feeding period. These results indicate that under good pasture conditions with some green feed available, and when lupins are supplied, responses to mineral supplements are unlikely.

Wool production and heterosis by the Merino, the Polwarth, and their reciprocal crosses

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 397 ◽  
Author(s):  
LG Butler ◽  
BJ Horton ◽  
PM Williams ◽  
RG Banks
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Effect ◽  
Reciprocal Cross ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Or Efficiency ◽  
Weaning Weight ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Lower Production

Tasmanian Merinos and Polwarths were mated in each of 2 years to produce 2 drops of Merino, Polwarth, and F1 reciprocal cross progeny. Polwarths had weaning weights similar to Merinos but were 14% heavier as hoggets. Polwarths grew a similar amount of wool of 11% greater (P<0.001) fibre diameter; however, wool production was 9% less efficient based on metabolic weight. Polwarths displayed an advantage in resistance to footrot. There was a marked Polwarth maternal effect of about 16% on weaning weight but no elfect on hogget weight. The Polwarth maternal effect on fleece weight and efficiency was 9% (P<0.001). In a comparison with a single-born male, ewes weighed 5% less at weaning and 7% less at hogget shearing and produced about 6% less wool (P<0.001), although of comparable fibre diameter. Twins weighed 17% less at weaning, but only 3% less at hogget shearing (P<0.001). They grew about 5% less wool, which was of 2% greater fibre diameter (P<0.001) and 5% higher wool score, but efficiency was 2.5% lower. Production was generally lower (except for yield and wool score) in the 1988 drop than the 1987 drop by 3-10%. Differences in productivity between ram sources were of only slightly lesser magnitude than differences between breeds. The number of feet affected by footrot was reduced by 17% in the 1988 drop. Severe footrot affecting more than 1 foot reduced liveweight but did not significantly reduce fleece weight. There appeared to be some heterosis for weaning weight (10%) and hogget weight (6%), but little heterosis in wool growth (2-3%) or efficiency (-2%).

Frequency of feeding lupin and canola meal supplements to young sheep influences wool growth and mitotic rate but not staple strength

2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
D. G. Masters ◽  
G. Mata ◽  
S. M. Liu ◽  
A. C. Schlink
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Basal Diet ◽  
Mitotic Rate ◽  
Supplementary Feeding ◽  
Canola Meal ◽  
Daily Feeding ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Gradual Loss ◽  
Staple Strength

In Australia, young sheep often require supplements for part of the year to survive. This study investigated the influence of supplementary-feeding interval, supplement type and pattern of weight loss on wool growth, fibre diameter and staple strength. Weaners (64, 6–7-month old) were fed a basal diet of oaten hay, oaten straw and minerals every day and, in addition, were fed 1 of 2 supplement types. The design was factorial (2 by 3) and the factors were: frequency of supplementation (daily or weekly), type of supplement (lupin seed or canola meal) and pattern of weight loss (88 g/day loss for 1 month followed by 16 g/day for the second month or a gradual loss of 36 g/day for the full 2 months). Feeding supplements daily did not have any significant effect on fibre diameter (16.2 v. 16.2 m) or coefficient of variation of fibre diameter (18.7 v. 19.2%) during the experiment, or on staple strength (27.0 v. 28.4 N/ktex) compared with the weekly feeding. Similarly, staple strength was not affected by the type of supplement (26.3 N/ktex for lupin-fed sheep v. 29.0 N/ktex for canola meal-fed sheep). There was a significant interaction between feeding interval and supplement type on the rate of wool growth. Weekly feeding of canola meal increased wool growth relative to daily feeding (0.067 v. 0.062 g/100 cm2 .day) whereas, weekly feeding of lupins decreased wool growth relative to daily feeding (0.055 v. 0.059 g/100 cm2.day). Weekly feeding of lupins also increased levels of urea in plasma relative to all other groups for 2 days after feeding and reduced mitotic rate in the skin (relative to the canola meal-fed group) 3 days after the supplementation. While there were also some differences between treatments in plasma glucose, creatine kinase and amino aspartate transaminase, all groups remained within the normal range. These results indicate that the interval between supplementary feeding is unlikely to contribute to low staple strength in grazing weaners but will influence the efficiency of use of nutrients for wool growth.

Effects of defaunation of the rumen and supplementation with amino acids on the wool production of housed Saxon Merinos. 4. Cottonseed meal, analogues of methionine and avoparcin

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 707 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Cottle
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Fibre Diameter ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Wool Fibre ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Wool Production ◽  
Wool Growth ◽  
Fleece Weight ◽  
Ciliate Protozoa

Ten groups, each of 6 superfine Merino wethers were individually penned indoors and hand-fed at maintenance level a ration of 70% oats and 30% chopped lucerne hay (w/w). The groups of sheep were fed 3 different supplementary pellets rotationally during three 9-week periods. Each group received 3 of the following 7 pellets: (1) control, (2) cottonseed meal (CSM), (3) CSM plus hydroxymethyl-methionine (MEP), (4) CSM plus methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA), (5) CSM plus avoparcin (AV), (6) CSM plus MEP plus AV, and (7) CSM plus MHA plus AV. The rations were offered 3 times a week. Half of the sheep had no rumen ciliate protozoa. Wool production was measured during the 7-month period. Defaunation resulted in a 6.9% increase in greasy fleece weight and a 7.7% increase in clean wool production. Average wool fibre diameter increased by 0.6 pm in defaunated sheep. The clean wool growth responses compared with sheep fed the control pellets were 4, 5, 12, 0, 3 and 9% respectively for sheep fed pellets 2-7. The most cost-effective supplement was the CSM plus MHA pellet, which increased clean wool production by 0.5 glday compared with sheep fed the CSM pellet but did not significantly affect wool quality. It was concluded that supplements containing MHA could be economically fed to housed superfine Merino wethers ('Sharlea'), but MHA appears to be relatively inefficient in supplying methionine to the intestines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document