scholarly journals Improving gout education from patients’ perspectives: a focus group study of Māori and Pākehā people with gout

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra J. Rolston ◽  
Tamlin S. Conner ◽  
Lisa K. Stamp ◽  
Tia Neha ◽  
Suzanne Pitama ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Gout is a common form of arthritis that is typically managed in primary care. Gout management guidelines emphasise patient education for successful treatment outcomes, but there is limited literature about the educational experiences of people living with gout in New Zealand, particularly for Māori, who have higher gout prevalence and worse gout outcomes than Pākehā. AIM To explore gout patient education in primary care from the perspectives of Māori and Pākehā people with gout. METHODS In total, 69 people with gout were recruited through primary care providers in three locations across New Zealand. Nine semi-structured focus groups were run with Māori and Pākehā participants in separate groups. RESULTS Thematic analysis yielded two themes in relation to gout education: (i) ‘Multiple sources of gout education’; and (ii) ‘Gaps in gout knowledge’. Participants received education from general practitioners, educational resources, family and friends, and their own experiences. Māori participants preferred information to be kanohi-ki-te-kanohi (face-to-face) and with significant others present where necessary. Participants disclosed gaps in gout’s epidemiology and management. Pākehā and Māori participants reported limited understanding of the genetic basis of gout or the biological underpinnings of the condition and its treatments, but learned treatment adherence through experience. DISCUSSION Despite improved gout patient education, knowledge gaps remain and may contribute to poor medication adherence. Gout patient education interventions need to be tailored to culture and incorporate suitable methods of disseminating information about gout management.

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Hoedebecke ◽  
Joseph Scott-Jones ◽  
Luís Pinho-Costa

Abstract The international ‘#1WordforFamilyMedicine’ initiative explores the identity of General Practitioners (GPs) and Family Physicians (FPs) by allowing the international Family Medicine community to collaborate on advocating for the discipline via social media. The New Zealand version attracted 83 responses on social media. Thematic analysis was performed on the responses and a ‘word cloud’ image was created based on an image identifying the country around the world - that of the silver fern. The ‘#1WorldforFamilyMedicine’ project was promoted by WONCA (World Organisation of Family Doctors) globally to help celebrate World Family Doctor Day on 19 May 2015. To date, over 80 images have been created in 60 different countries on six continents. The images represent GPs’ love for their profession and the community they serve. We hope that this initiative will help inspire current and future Family Medicine and Primary Care providers.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 42-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karima Khamisa ◽  
Adam Fogel ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Amir Afkham

Abstract Background Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada. The Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service is a secure web-based tool that gives primary care providers (PCPs) expedited access to specialist advice for their patients in Ontario, Canada. Hematology is the third most commonly consulted specialty in the eConsult service, accounting for 8% of all cases. The purpose of this study is to perform an in-depth analysis to describe the types of questions, content, utilization, and impact of hematology eConsults submitted by PCPs. Additionally, the results will inform future continuing medical education activities for PCPs. Methods All Hematology eConsults completed between April 1, 2011 and January 31, 2015 were included. We analyzed and categorized each consultation by: (1) clinical content (up to two per case) using a modification of the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC-2); and (2) type of questions asked by the PCP based on a validated taxonomy. Other data including PCP designation, time for specialist to complete the eConsult, specialist response time, perceived value of the eConsult by the PCP, and the need for a face-to-face referral following the eConsult was collected in real time via the eConsult service and a survey completed by the initiating PCP at the closure of each eConsult. Results There were a total of 436 Hematology eConsults submitted, 87% from physicians and 13% from Nurse Practitioners. Most cases were answered within 3 days. The most common types of questions being asked pertained to management of hematologic disorders (25%), interpretation of a laboratory test (22%) and appropriate further investigative tests (18%). Common clinical content categories were anemia (22%), neutropenia (13%), high ferritin (11%), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or an abnormal protein electrophoresis (10%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). Two clinical content categories were included in 19% of cases. Self-reported response time by hematologists was under 10 minutes in >75% of cases. Over 66% of cases did not require a face-to-face visit with the specialist following an eConsult; in fact, in 46% of cases an unnecessary referral was avoided. In 4% of cases, a face-to-face consultation was initiated where one was not originally contemplated. PCPs gained new or additional advice for a course of action in 58% of eConsults, and were able to confirm their original course of action in 39% of cases. PCPs rated the value of the eConsult service as ≥4/5 for both themselves and patients in >90% of cases. Impact The hematology eConsult service has significantly increased access to specialist care in a timely manner compared to traditional face-to-face consultations. The service allowed a significant proportion of patients to avoid traditional consultations leading to the potential of cost savings and increased patient safety. Identifying the most common questions and content being asked via the eConsult service will allow for more informed continuing medical education programs for PCPs so that patients can be better served in the primary care setting. Disclosures Khamisa: Amgen: Speakers Bureau.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruchi Murthy ◽  
Gregory Rose ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Erin Keely

Abstract Background Since 2010, the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialist Advice through eConsultation) has allowed primary care providers (PCPs) to submit clinical questions to specialists through a secure web service. The study objectives are to describe questions asked to Infectious Diseases specialists through eConsultation and assess impact on physician behaviors. Methods eConsults completed through the Champlain BASE service from April 15, 2013 to January 29, 2015 were characterized by the type of question asked and infectious disease content. Usage data and PCP responses to a closeout survey were analyzed to determine eConsult response time, change in referral plans, and change in planned course of action. Results Of the 224 infectious diseases eConsults, the most common question types were as follows: interpretation of a clinical test 18.0% (41), general management 16.5 % (37), and indications/goals of treating a particular condition 16.5% (37). The most frequently consulted infectious diseases were as follows: tuberculosis 14.3% (32), Lyme disease 14.3% (32), and parasitology 12.9% (29). Within 24 hours, 63% of cases responded to the questions, and 82% of cases took under 15 minutes to complete. In 32% of cases, a face-to-face referral was originally planned by the PCP but was no longer needed. In 8% of cases, the PCP referred the patient despite originally not planning to make a referral. In 55% of cases, the PCP either received new information or changed their course of action. Conclusions An eConsult service provides PCPs with timely access to infectious disease specialists’ advice that often results in a change in plans for a face-to-face referral.


1999 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARSHA MOORE KENNER ◽  
MARTHA L TAYLOR ◽  
P.CAROLYN DUNN ◽  
HARVEY W GRUCHOW ◽  
KATHY KOLASA

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Bernstein ◽  
Cosima Locher ◽  
Sif Stewart‐Ferrer ◽  
Sarah Buergler ◽  
Catherine M. DesRoches ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatinderpreet Singh ◽  
Allison Lou ◽  
Michael Green ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Mary Greenaway ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Access to transgender care in Canada is poor. Although primary care providers are ideally positioned to initiate care, many feel uncomfortable providing transgender care. This study aimed to explore the impact of an electronic consultation (eConsult) service between primary care providers and transgender care specialists on access to care and to explore the content of clinical questions that were asked. Methods This was a retrospective mixed methods analysis of 62 eConsults submitted between January 2017 and December 2018 by primary care providers to specialists in transgender care in a health region in eastern Ontario, Canada. A descriptive analysis was conducted to assess the average response time and the total time spent by the specialist for the eConsults. An inductive and deductive content analysis was carried out to identify common themes of clinical questions being asked to transgender specialists. A post-eConsult survey completed by primary care providers was assessed to gain insight into avoided face-to-face referrals and overall provider satisfaction. Results The median specialist response time was 1.2 days (range: 1 h to 5 days) and the average time spent by specialists per eConsult was 18 min (range: 10 to 40 min). The qualitative analysis identified six major themes: 1) interpretation/management of abnormal bloodwork, 2) change in management due to lack of desired effect/hormone levels not a target, 3) initiation of hormone therapy/initial work up, 4) management of adverse effects of hormone therapy, 5) transition related surgery counseling and post-op complications, and 6) management of patients with comorbidities. Approximately one-third of eConsults resulted in an avoided face-to-face referral and 95% of primary care providers rated the value of their eConsult as a 5 (excellent value) or 4. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a transgender eConsult service has potential to significantly improve access to care for transgender patients. Given the importance that timely access has on improving mental health and reducing suicide attempts, eConsult has the potential to make a substantial clinical impact on this population. Identified themes of eConsult questions provides insight into potential gaps in knowledge amongst primary care providers that could help inform future continuing education events.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Gorriz ◽  
Rosa De Ramon ◽  
Isidro Torregrosa Maicas ◽  
Francesc Moncho ◽  
Sergio Garcia-Vicente ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is recognized as a health problem in the general population; as a result, there is a growing demand for specialist services. This is especially relevant in the Spanish health system which covers the entire population free of charge. We describe our experience with new e-consultation software that allows specialists to provide clinical recommendations to primary care providers about non-subsidiary patients referred to our Nephrology Department. This system respects current protocols and is based on patient chart review without face-to-face visits, thus avoiding unnecessary time wastage in the healthcare system. Method Our Nephrology department covers the metropolitan area of Valencia with 341,972 citizens attended by 16 primary care centers. The Community IT software system allows all doctors (hospitals and primary care) to access the patient's medical records including laboratory, radiology, anthropometric data and treatments. A mailbox, developed as part of the Hospital General’s IT system, receives all proposed referrals from primary care doctors to our department. A nephrologist then decides if the e-consultation requires an in-person visit or can be answered as a non face-to-face visit. Thus, patient’s appointments are scheduled in less than one week (mean 3.8±4.5 days) and the outpatient visit in less than 14 days. The main referral criteria were: albumin/creatinine ratio> 300 mg/g, eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 (<45 in <70 years), renal progression, resistant hypertension in CKD patients, electrolyte abnormalities and renal anemia. Patients with conditions that do not meet referral criteria are attended and given the appropriate recommendations via e-consultation. The patient is not required to present at the hospital. We describe the results of e-consultations from 1St September 2017 to 31st December 2019. Results A total of 2641 consultations were submitted between September, 2017 to December, 2019 (807 in 2017, 861 in 2018 and 903 in 2019). Of these, 285 (12%) were answered as non face-to-face visit (6% of the 2017 e-consultations, 11% from 2018 and 24% from 2019). The characteristics of the 285 non face-to-face e-consultations: mean age: 68.9 ±19.5 years, female: 61.4%, diabetics: 31.2%. The main reasons for referral were: mild/low eGFR (35%), mild albuminuria (10%), administrative questions related to treatments (10%), mild hypertension (4%), mild electrolyte disturbances (2%), subacute renal dysfunction resolved (10%) (mostly NSAIDs), non-nephrology causes (mainly urological) (8%), non-renal pathology (simple renal cysts, other) (10%) and other causes (11%). The re-consult rate was 2% within the first year. Regarding patients referred with low eGFR, the mean age was 76 ± 14 years (range: 19-98), female sex: 73.9%, eGFR: 39±11 ml/min/1.73m2, serum creatinine 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dL. Urine alb/creat ratio: 49±127 mg/g. Thirty five percent of them were between 70-79 years and 48% were> 80 years old. For those patients referred with mild albuminuria: mean age was: 57±21 years, male sex: 61%, diabetics: 31%, eGFR: 77±18 ml/min/1.73m2, serum creatinine 0.87±0.27 mg/dL. Urine alb/creat ratio: 83 ± 54 mg/g (range 33-128). There was a 17 day waiting list to attend an outpatient nephrology clinic in 2016 (previous to the initiation of the e-consultation period). On the contrary, during the study period it was 14 days in 2017 and 4 days each in both 2018 and 2019. Conclusion Our experience shows that non-face-to-face e-consultation for patients with mild renal pathology promotes the effective management of patients who do not meet remission criteria according to established protocols. It also prevents the remission of a significant percentage of patients, reduces the waiting list and optimizes the healthcare system’s resources.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek K. Dobke ◽  
Dhaval Bhavsar ◽  
Fernando Herrera

The purpose of our study was to determine the factors that influence the use of telemedicine consultation by primary care physicians (PCPs) in the management of patients with problem wounds. A short questionnaire was administered to thirty-six PCPs who referred to our Wound Care Program within one year. Participants were asked to rate the importance of specific concerns and benefits regarding the role of wound care surgical specialist (WCSS) and the use of telemedicine consults prior to possible face-to-face consultation. Sixty percent of respondents felt comfortable with telemedicine consultation based on recommendations alone. The total number of patients referred for telemedicine consult was 230, and face-to-face consultation with a WCSS was offered and arranged for 30% of patients. The perception of shared decision making, streamlining patient care, and an opportunity for followup were all highly ranked benefits. The majority of PCPs (93%) agreed that telemedicine wound care consult is a useful tool in their practice and would continue to use the telemedicine consult service.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Nabelsi ◽  
Annabelle Lévesque-Chouinard ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Maxine Dumas Pilon

BACKGROUND Access to specialty care remains a major challenge in the Canadian health care system. Electronic consultation (eConsult) services allow primary care providers to seek specialist advice often without needing the patient to go for a face-to-face consultation. It improves overall access to specialists and the referral process using an electronic care consultation service in urban and rural primary care clinics. This study describes the preliminary results of a pilot study with an eConsult service across 3 regions in the province of Quebec, Canada. OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study was to provide a 1-year snapshot of the implementation of the eConsult Quebec Service in rural and urban primary care clinics to improve access to care and the specialty referral process for primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS We established an eConsult service that covers urban and rural communities in 3 regions of Quebec. We conducted a quantitative analysis of all eConsult cases submitted from July 4, 2017, to December 8, 2018. RESULTS For over a year, 1016 eConsults have been generated during the course of this study. A total of 97 PCPs submitted requests to 22 specialty groups and were answered by 40 different specialists. The most popular specialty was internal medicine (224/1016, 22%). Overall, 63% (640/1016) of completed cases did not require a face-to-face visit. PCPs rated the service as being of high or very high value for themselves in 98% (996/1016) of cases. CONCLUSIONS The preliminary data highlight the success of the implementation of the eConsult Quebec Service across 6 primary care clinics. The eConsult platform proves to be effective, efficient, and well received by both patients and physicians. If used more widely, eConsult could help reducing wait times significantly. Recently, the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec has identified developing a strategic plan to scale eConsults throughout other regions of the province as a top priority.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document