Brassica crops stimulate soil mineral N accumulation

Soil Research ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Ryan ◽  
J. A. Kirkegaard ◽  
J. F. Angus

The impact of Brassica crops and their tissues on accumulation of mineral N in soil was examined in the field and in laboratory incubation experiments. Mineral N accumulation over the summer fallow increased by an additional 39–49 kg/ha in the top 0.10 m of soil following brassicas compared with wheat at 2 sites. At a third site there was no increase in the top 0.10 m, but this was possibly due to leaching, as a 21–39 kg/ha increase was detected over the 1.50 m profile. The accumulation of mineral N in soil collected after harvest of canola crops and incubated in the laboratory was double that of soil collected after non-Brassica crops. This outcome was not evident in soil collected when crops were flowering, only occurred in the top 0.05 m of soil, and did not persist beyond week 3 of the incubation. In further laboratory incubations using tissues from wheat and a range of brassicas matched for C : N ratio but differing in glucosinolate concentration, Brassica root tissues initially immobilised, and later released, mineral N at a greater rate than wheat root tissues. These results suggest that enhanced accumulation of mineral N following Brassica crops compared with cereal crops is unlikely to be due to biofumigation of the soil microbial community. Shifts in the composition of the soil microbial community and differences in the chemical constituents of root tissues and in above-ground crop residue inputs may instead be responsible.

2014 ◽  
Vol 955-959 ◽  
pp. 3635-3639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hua Wang ◽  
Xue Gong ◽  
Jian Fei Guan ◽  
Hui Yan Xing

The reclaimed water treated in a Harbin recycled water plant has been taken as a target of research, by using microbial traditional culture method and tablet coated counting method, discussing the influence of the reclaimed water irrigation on soil microbial community structure through the method of short-term indoor simulated soil column irrigation. The results shows that the reclaimed water irrigation can significantly increase the quantity of bacteria and actinomycetes in the surface 0-20 cm layer soil, but it has little affect on 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm layer soil. Microbial community structure and diversity were changed relatively with the irrigation of reclaimed water, which embodied the increase or decrease of dominant and subdominant groups, the disappearance of non-dominant groups sensitive to reclaimed water, the appear or disappear of the other part of the occasional groups.


2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 777-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Lin Hu ◽  
Kangho Jung ◽  
De-Hui Zeng ◽  
Scott X. Chang

Chronic nitrogen (N) and (or) sulfur (S) deposition to boreal forests in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) in Alberta, Canada, has been caused by oil sands mining and extraction/upgrading activities. It is important that we understand the response of microbial community function to chronic N and S deposition as microbial populations mediate soil carbon (C) and N cycles and affect ecosystem resilience. To evaluate the impact of N and (or) S deposition on soil microbial community functions, we conducted a simulated N and S deposition experiment in a boreal mixedwood forest with the following four treatments: control (CK), N addition (+N, 30 kg N·ha−1 as NH4NO3), S addition (+S, 30 kg S·ha−1 as NaSO4), and N plus S addition (+NS, 30 kg N·ha−1 + 30 kg S·ha−1), from 2006 to 2010. Nitrogen and (or) S deposition did not change soil organic carbon, total N, dissolved organic C and N, or soil microbial biomass C and N. Soil microbial community-level physiological profiles, however, were strongly affected by 5 years of N and (or) S addition. Soil β-glucosidase activity in the +NS treatment was greater than that in the +S treatment, and S addition decreased soil arylsulfatase; however, urease and dehydrogenase activities were not affected by the simulated N and (or) S deposition. Our data suggested that N and (or) S deposition strongly affected soil microbial community functions and enzymatic activities without changing soil microbial biomass in the studied boreal forest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 728-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Mallon ◽  
X. Le Roux ◽  
G. S. van Doorn ◽  
F. Dini-Andreote ◽  
F. Poly ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 2086-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Manter ◽  
Tiffany L. Weir ◽  
Jorge M. Vivanco

ABSTRACT In this study, we examined the effect of various pooling strategies on the characterization of soil microbial community composition and phylotype richness estimates. Automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) profiles were determined from soil samples that were (i) unpooled (extracted and amplified individually), (ii) pooled prior to PCR amplification, or (iii) pooled prior to DNA extraction. Regression analyses suggest that the less even the soil microbial community (i.e., low Shannon equitability, EH ), the greater was the impact of either pooling strategy on microbial detection (R 2 = 0.766). For example, at a tropical rainforest site, which had the most uneven fungal (EH of 0.597) and bacterial communities (EH of 0.822), the unpooled procedure detected an additional 67 fungal and 115 bacterial phylotypes relative to either of the pooled procedures. Phylotype rarity, resulting in missed detection upon pooling, differed between the fungal and bacterial communities. Fungi were typified by locally abundant but spatially rare phylotypes, and the bacteria were typified by locally rare but spatially ubiquitous phylotypes. As a result, pooling differentially influenced plot comparisons, leading to an increase in similarity for the bacterial community and a decrease in the fungal community. In conclusion, although pooling reduces sample numbers and variability, it could mask a significant portion of the detectable microbial community, particularly for fungi due to their higher spatial heterogeneity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1157-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florine Degrune ◽  
Marc Dufrêne ◽  
Gilles Colinet ◽  
Sébastien Massart ◽  
Bernard Taminiau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document