scholarly journals Trunk neural crest origin of dermal denticles in a cartilaginous fish

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (50) ◽  
pp. 13200-13205 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Andrew Gillis ◽  
Els C. Alsema ◽  
Katharine E. Criswell
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cartilaginous Fish ◽  
Lineage Tracing ◽  
Skeletal Tissue ◽  
Trunk Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Origin ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Cartilaginous fishes (e.g., sharks and skates) possess a postcranial dermal skeleton consisting of tooth-like “denticles” embedded within their skin. As with teeth, the principal skeletal tissue of dermal denticles is dentine. In the head, cranial neural crest cells give rise to the dentine-producing cells (odontoblasts) of teeth. However, trunk neural crest cells are generally regarded as nonskeletogenic, and so the embryonic origin of trunk denticle odontoblasts remains unresolved. Here, we use expression of FoxD3 to pinpoint the specification and emigration of trunk neural crest cells in embryos of a cartilaginous fish, the little skate (Leucoraja erinacea). Using cell lineage tracing, we further demonstrate that trunk neural crest cells do, in fact, give rise to odontoblasts of trunk dermal denticles. These findings expand the repertoire of vertebrate trunk neural crest cell fates during normal development, highlight the likely primitive skeletogenic potential of this cell population, and point to a neural crest origin of dentine throughout the ancestral vertebrate dermal skeleton.

scholarly journals Cell lineage analysis of the avian neural crest

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Bronner-Fraser ◽  
Scott E. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Sympathetic Neurons ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Trunk Neural Crest

Neural crest cells migrate extensively and give rise to diverse cell types, including cells of the sensory and autonomic nervous systems. A major unanswered question concerning the neural crest is when and how the neural crest cells become determined to adopt a particular fate. We have explored the developmental potential of trunk neural crest cells in avian embryos by microinjecting a vital dye, lysinated rhodamine dextran (LRD), into individual cells within the dorsal neural tube. We find that premigratory and emigrating neural crest cells give rise to descendants with distinct phenotypes in multiple neural crest derivatives. These results are consistent with the idea that neural crest cells are multipotent prior to their emigration from the neural tube and become restricted in phenotype after emigration from the neural tube either during their migration or at their sites of localization. To determine whether neural crest cells become restricted during their migration, we have microinjected individual trunk neural crest cells with dye shortly after they leave the neural tube or as they migrate through the somite. We find that a majority of the clones derived from migrating neural crest cells appear to be multipotent; individual migrating neural crest cells gave rise to both sensory and sympathetic neurons, as well as cells with the morphological characteristics of Schwann cells, and other nonneuronal cells. Even those clones contributing to only one neural crest derivative often contained both neurofilament-positive and neurofilament-negative cells. These data demonstrate that migrating trunk neural crest cells, like their premigratory progenitors, can be multipotent. They give rise to cells in multiple neural crest derivatives and contribute to both neuronal and non-neuronal elements within a given derivative. Thus, restriction of neural crest cell fate must occur relatively late in migration or at the final destinations.

scholarly journals Cranial and trunk neural crest cells use different mechanisms for attachment to extracellular matrices

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lallier ◽  
G. Leblanc ◽  
K.B. Artinger ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Divalent Cation ◽  
Cell Attachment ◽  
Divalent Cations ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Trunk Neural Crest ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Crest Cell

We have used a quantitative cell attachment assay to compare the interactions of cranial and trunk neural crest cells with the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules fibronectin, laminin and collagen types I and IV. Antibodies to the beta 1 subunit of integrin inhibited attachment under all conditions tested, suggesting that integrins mediate neural crest cell interactions with these ECM molecules. The HNK-1 antibody against a surface carbohydrate epitope under certain conditions inhibited both cranial and trunk neural crest cell attachment to laminin, but not to fibronectin. An antiserum to alpha 1 intergrin inhibited attachment of trunk, but not cranial, neural crest cells to laminin and collagen type I, though interactions with fibronectin or collagen type IV were unaffected. The surface properties of trunk and cranial neural crest cells differed in several ways. First, trunk neural crest cells attached to collagen types I and IV, but cranial neural crest cells did not. Second, their divalent cation requirements for attachment to ECM molecules differed. For fibronectin substrata, trunk neural crest cells required divalent cations for attachment, whereas cranial neural crest cells bound in the absence of divalent cations. However, cranial neural crest cells lost this cation-independent attachment after a few days of culture. For laminin substrata, trunk cells used two integrins, one divalent cation-dependent and the other divalent cation-independent (Lallier, T. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1991) Development 113, 1069–1081). In contrast, cranial neural crest cells attached to laminin using a single, divalent cation-dependent receptor system. Immunoprecipitations and immunoblots of surface labelled neural crest cells with HNK-1, alpha 1 integrin and beta 1 integrin antibodies suggest that cranial and trunk neural crest cells possess biochemically distinct integrins. Our results demonstrate that cranial and trunk cells differ in their mechanisms of adhesion to selected ECM components, suggesting that they are non-overlapping populations of cells with regard to their adhesive properties.

Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 1671-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Chai ◽  
X. Jiang ◽  
Y. Ito ◽  
P. Bringas ◽  
J. Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Genetic System ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Mouse Line ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Two Component

Neural crest cells are multipotential stem cells that contribute extensively to vertebrate development and give rise to various cell and tissue types. Determination of the fate of mammalian neural crest has been inhibited by the lack of appropriate markers. Here, we make use of a two-component genetic system for indelibly marking the progeny of the cranial neural crest during tooth and mandible development. In the first mouse line, Cre recombinase is expressed under the control of the Wnt1 promoter as a transgene. Significantly, Wnt1 transgene expression is limited to the migrating neural crest cells that are derived from the dorsal CNS. The second mouse line, the ROSA26 conditional reporter (R26R), serves as a substrate for the Cre-mediated recombination. Using this two-component genetic system, we have systematically followed the migration and differentiation of the cranial neural crest (CNC) cells from E9.5 to 6 weeks after birth. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that CNC cells contribute to the formation of condensed dental mesenchyme, dental papilla, odontoblasts, dentine matrix, pulp, cementum, periodontal ligaments, chondrocytes in Meckel's cartilage, mandible, the articulating disc of temporomandibular joint and branchial arch nerve ganglia. More importantly, there is a dynamic distribution of CNC- and non-CNC-derived cells during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. These results are a first step towards a comprehensive understanding of neural crest cell migration and differentiation during mammalian craniofacial development. Furthermore, this transgenic model also provides a new tool for cell lineage analysis and genetic manipulation of neural-crest-derived components in normal and abnormal embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Connexin 43 impacts the chick premigratory cranial neural crest cell population without affecting the neural crest cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karyn Jourdeuil ◽  
Lisa A. Taneyhill
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Gap Junction ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Junction Protein ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Crest Cell

ABSTRACTGap junctions are intercellular channels that allow for the diffusion of small ions and solutes between coupled cells. Connexin 43 (Cx43), also known as Gap Junction Protein α1, is the most broadly expressed gap junction protein in vertebrate development. Cx43 is strongly expressed in premigratory cranial neural crest cells and is maintained throughout the neural crest cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), but its function in these cells is not known. To this end, we have used a combination of in vivo and ex vivo live imaging with confocal microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and functional assays to assess gap junction formation, and Cx43 function, in chick premigratory cranial neural crest cells. Our results demonstrate that gap junctions exist between chick premigratory and migratory cranial neural crest cells, with Cx43 depletion inhibiting the function of gap junctions. While a reduction in Cx43 levels just prior to neural crest cell EMT did not affect EMT and subsequent emigration of neural crest cells from the neural tube, the size of the premigratory neural crest cell domain was decreased in the absence of any changes in cell proliferation or death. Collectively, these data identify a role for Cx43 within the chick premigratory cranial neural crest cell population prior to EMT and migration.

The chinless mutation and neural crest cell interactions in zebrafish jaw development

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1417-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
C. Walker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Host Genotype ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Expression Studies ◽  
Gene Expression Studies ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

During vertebrate development, neural crest cells are thought to pattern many aspects of head organization, including the segmented skeleton and musculature of the jaw and gills. Here we describe mutations at the gene chinless, chn, that disrupt the skeletal fates of neural crest cells in the head of the zebrafish and their interactions with muscle precursors. chn mutants lack neural-crest-derived cartilage and mesoderm-derived muscles in all seven pharyngeal arches. Fate mapping and gene expression studies demonstrate the presence of both undifferentiated cartilage and muscle precursors in mutants. However, chn blocks differentiation directly in neural crest, and not in mesoderm, as revealed by mosaic analyses. Neural crest cells taken from wild-type donor embryos can form cartilage when transplanted into chn mutant hosts and rescue some of the patterning defects of mutant pharyngeal arches. In these cases, cartilage only forms if neural crest is transplanted at least one hour before its migration, suggesting that interactions occur transiently in early jaw precursors. In contrast, transplanted cells in paraxial mesoderm behave according to the host genotype; mutant cells form jaw muscles in a wild-type environment. These results suggest that chn is required for the development of pharyngeal cartilages from cranial neural crest cells and subsequent crest signals that pattern mesodermally derived myocytes.

scholarly journals The alx3 gene shapes the zebrafish neurocranium by regulating frontonasal neural crest cell differentiation timing

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennyfer M. Mitchell ◽  
Juliana Sucharov ◽  
Anthony T. Pulvino ◽  
Elliott P. Brooks ◽  
Austin E. Gillen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Developmental Timing ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Cell Subpopulations ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Discrete Populations ◽  
Crest Cell

ABSTRACT During craniofacial development, different populations of cartilage- and bone-forming cells develop in precise locations in the head. Most of these cells are derived from pluripotent cranial neural crest cells and differentiate with distinct developmental timing and cellular morphologies. The mechanisms that divide neural crest cells into discrete populations are not fully understood. Here, we use single-cell RNA sequencing to transcriptomically define different populations of cranial neural crest cells. We discovered that the gene family encoding the Alx transcription factors is enriched in the frontonasal population of neural crest cells. Genetic mutant analyses indicate that alx3 functions to regulate the distinct differentiation timing and cellular morphologies among frontonasal neural crest cell subpopulations. This study furthers our understanding of how genes controlling developmental timing shape craniofacial skeletal elements.

Restriction of neural crest cell fate in the trunk of the embryonic zebrafish

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Raible ◽  
J.S. Eisen
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Multiple Phenotypes ◽  
Trunk Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Derivatives Of ◽  
Crest Cell ◽  
Do So

To learn when cell fate differences first arise in the zebrafish trunk neural crest, individual premigratory crest cells were labeled intracellularly with fluorescent vital dyes, followed in living embryos and complete lineages recorded. Although some of the earliest cells to migrate produced derivatives of multiple phenotypes, most zebrafish trunk neural crest cells appear to be lineage-restricted, generating type-restricted precursors that produce single kinds of derivatives. Further, cells that produce derivatives of multiple phenotypes appear to do so by first generating type-restricted precursors. Among the various types of derivatives, sensory and sympathetic cells arise only from early migrating crest cells. Some type-restricted precursors display cell-type-specific characteristics while still migrating. Taken together, these observations suggest that some trunk neural crest cells are specified before reaching their final locations.

scholarly journals Neural crest lineage analysis: from past to future trajectory

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (20) ◽  
pp. dev193193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyi Tang ◽  
Marianne E. Bronner
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Lineage Tracing ◽  
Migration Routes ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Lineage Analysis

ABSTRACTSince its discovery 150 years ago, the neural crest has intrigued investigators owing to its remarkable developmental potential and extensive migratory ability. Cell lineage analysis has been an essential tool for exploring neural crest cell fate and migration routes. By marking progenitor cells, one can observe their subsequent locations and the cell types into which they differentiate. Here, we review major discoveries in neural crest lineage tracing from a historical perspective. We discuss how advancing technologies have refined lineage-tracing studies, and how clonal analysis can be applied to questions regarding multipotency. We also highlight how effective progenitor cell tracing, when combined with recently developed molecular and imaging tools, such as single-cell transcriptomics, single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization and high-resolution imaging, can extend the scope of neural crest lineage studies beyond development to regeneration and cancer initiation.

scholarly journals A novel spalt gene expressed in branchial arches affects the ability of cranial neural crest cells to populate sensory ganglia

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEYER BAREMBAUM ◽  
MARIANNE BRONNER-FRASER
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Differentiation Markers ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Cranial neural crest cells differentiate into diverse derivatives including neurons and glia of the cranial ganglia, and cartilage and bone of the facial skeleton. Here, we explore the function of a novel transcription factor of the spalt family that might be involved in early cell-lineage decisions of the avian neural crest. The chicken spalt4 gene (csal4) is expressed in the neural tube, migrating neural crest, branchial arches and, transiently, in the cranial ectoderm. Later, it is expressed in the mesectodermal, but not neuronal or glial, derivatives of midbrain and hindbrain neural crest. After over-expression by electroporation into the cranial neural tube and neural crest, we observed a marked redistribution of electroporated neural crest cells in the vicinity of the trigeminal ganglion. In control-electroporated embryos, numerous, labeled neural crest cells (∼80% of the population) entered the ganglion, many of which differentiated into neurons. By contrast, few (∼30% of the population) spalt-electroporated neural crest cells entered the trigeminal ganglion. Instead, they localized in the mesenchyme around the ganglionic periphery or continued further ventrally to the branchial arches. Interestingly, little or no expression of differentiation markers for neurons or other cell types was observed in spalt-electroporated neural crest cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document