scholarly journals Contrasting dynamics and trait controls in first-order root compared with leaf litter decomposition

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (41) ◽  
pp. 10392-10397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Sarah E. Hobbie ◽  
Björn Berg ◽  
Hongguang Zhang ◽  
Qingkui Wang ◽  
...  

Decomposition is a key component of the global carbon (C) cycle, yet current ecosystem C models do not adequately represent the contributions of plant roots and their mycorrhizae to this process. The understanding of decomposition dynamics and their control by traits is particularly limited for the most distal first-order roots. Here we followed decomposition of first-order roots and leaf litter from 35 woody plant species differing in mycorrhizal type over 6 years in a Chinese temperate forest. First-order roots decomposed more slowly (k = 0.11 ± 0.01 years−1) than did leaf litter (0.35 ± 0.02 years−1), losing only 35% of initial mass on average after 6 years of exposure in the field. In contrast to leaf litter, nonlignin root C chemistry (nonstructural carbohydrates, polyphenols) accounted for 82% of the large interspecific variation in first-order root decomposition. Leaf litter from ectomycorrhizal (EM) species decomposed more slowly than that from arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) species, whereas first-order roots of EM species switched, after 2 years, from having slower to faster decomposition compared with those from AM species. The fundamentally different dynamics and control mechanisms of first-order root decomposition compared with those of leaf litter challenge current ecosystem C models, the recently suggested dichotomy between EM and AM plants, and the idea that common traits can predict decomposition across roots and leaves. Aspects of C chemistry unrelated to lignin or nitrogen, and not presently considered in decomposition models, controlled first-order root decomposition; thus, current paradigms of ecosystem C dynamics and model parameterization require revision.

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P McGurk ◽  
Anne-Marie Dion-Côté ◽  
Daniel A Barbash

AbstractDrosophila telomeres have been maintained by three families of active transposable elements (TEs), HeT-A, TAHRE, and TART, collectively referred to as HTTs, for tens of millions of years, which contrasts with an unusually high degree of HTT interspecific variation. While the impacts of conflict and domestication are often invoked to explain HTT variation, the telomeres are unstable structures such that neutral mutational processes and evolutionary tradeoffs may also drive HTT evolution. We leveraged population genomic data to analyze nearly 10,000 HTT insertions in 85  Drosophila melanogaster genomes and compared their variation to other more typical TE families. We observe that occasional large-scale copy number expansions of both HTTs and other TE families occur, highlighting that the HTTs are, like their feral cousins, typically repressed but primed to take over given the opportunity. However, large expansions of HTTs are not caused by the runaway activity of any particular HTT subfamilies or even associated with telomere-specific TE activity, as might be expected if HTTs are in strong genetic conflict with their hosts. Rather than conflict, we instead suggest that distinctive aspects of HTT copy number variation and sequence diversity largely reflect telomere instability, with HTT insertions being lost at much higher rates than other TEs elsewhere in the genome. We extend previous observations that telomere deletions occur at a high rate, and surprisingly discover that more than one-third do not appear to have been healed with an HTT insertion. We also report that some HTT families may be preferentially activated by the erosion of whole telomeres, implying the existence of HTT-specific host control mechanisms. We further suggest that the persistent telomere localization of HTTs may reflect a highly successful evolutionary strategy that trades away a stable insertion site in order to have reduced impact on the host genome. We propose that HTT evolution is driven by multiple processes, with niche specialization and telomere instability being previously underappreciated and likely predominant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1891-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Bunn ◽  
Dylan T. Simpson ◽  
Lorinda S. Bullington ◽  
Ylva Lekberg ◽  
David P. Janos

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1079-1095
Author(s):  
Henrike Brüchner-Hüttemann ◽  
Christoph Ptatscheck ◽  
Walter Traunspurger

Abstract Meiofaunal abundance, biomass and secondary production were investigated over 13 months in an unpolluted first-order stream. Four microhabitats were considered: sediment and the biofilms on dead wood, macrophytes and leaf litter. The relative contribution of the microhabitats to secondary production and the influence of environmental factors on meiofaunal density distribution were estimated. We expected (1) meiofaunal abundance and biomass to exhibit seasonal patterns, with more pronounced seasonal fluctuations on macrophytes and leaf litter than in the other microhabitats, (2) annual secondary production to be highest in sediment; however, the relative contribution of the microhabitats to monthly secondary production would change during the year, and (3) a bottom-up driven influence on meiofaunal density distribution in the microhabitats. Meiofaunal annual mean abundance, biomass and secondary production were 7–14 times higher in sediment and on dead wood than on macrophytes and leaf litter. Significant seasonal patterns described the meiofaunal abundance in sediment and on leaf litter as well as the biomass in sediment, on macrophytes and leaf litter. Organisms in sediment and on dead wood contributed 48 and 43%, respectively, to secondary production m−2, but in regard to the stream area covered by the microhabitats, sediment had the highest share (80%). Significant determinants of the density distribution were AFDM, protozoans, bacteria and Chl-a, which influenced all meiofaunal groups. Our study clearly indicates that meiofaunal organisms in sediment and on dead wood have a remarkable share on total secondary production of lotic systems which is especially relevant for forested low-order streams.


Stroke ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
YURI E. MOSKALENKO ◽  
IVAN T. DEMCHENKO ◽  
ALEXANDER I. KRIVCHENKO ◽  
INNA P. FEDULOVA

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Yang ◽  
Klaus Schützenmeister ◽  
Diana Grubert ◽  
Hermann F. Jungkunst ◽  
Dirk Gansert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Moshe Sheintuch ◽  
Olga Nekhamkina

In loop reactors the system is composed of several reactor units that are  organized in a loop and the feeding takes place at one of several ports with switching of the feed port. In its simplest operation a pulse is formed and rotates around it, producing high temperatures which enable combustion of dilute streams.  A limiting model with infinite number of units was derived. Rotating pulses, steady in a moving coordinate, emerge in both models when the switching to front propagation velocities ~1. But this behavior exists over a narrow domain. Simulations were conducted with generic first order Arrhenius kinetics. Experimental observations are reviewed. Outside the narrow frozen rotating pattern domain the system may exhibit multi- or quasi-periodic operation separated by domains of inactive reaction. The bifurcation set incorporates many 'finger'-like domains of complex frequency-locked solutions that allow to extend the operation domain with higher feed temperatures. Control is necessary to attain stable simple rotating frozen pattern within the narrow domains of active operation. Various tested control approaches are reviewed.          Actual implementation of combustion in LR will involve several reactants of different ignition temperatures. Design and control should be aimed at producing locked fronts and avoid extinction of slower reactions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan-tao Chen ◽  
Yu-qin Chen ◽  
Yong Peng ◽  
Hong-ling Hu ◽  
Jiu-long Xie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document