scholarly journals Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint.

1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (25) ◽  
pp. 11791-11795 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Araki ◽  
S. H. Leem ◽  
A. Phongdara ◽  
A. Sugino
2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac A. Manke ◽  
Anhco Nguyen ◽  
Daniel Lim ◽  
Mary Q. Stewart ◽  
Andrew E.H. Elia ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 3103-3115 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Uchiyama ◽  
I Galli ◽  
D J Griffiths ◽  
T S Wang

A semipermissive growth condition was defined for a Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain carrying a thermosensitive allele of DNA polymerase delta (pol delta ts03). Under this condition, DNA polymerase delta is semidisabled and causes a delay in S-phase progression. Using a genetic strategy, we have isolated a panel of mutants that enter premature mitosis when DNA replication is incomplete but which are not defective for arrest in G2/M following DNA damage. We characterized the aya14 mutant, which enters premature mitosis when S phase is arrested by genetic or chemical means. However, this mutant is sensitive to neither UV nor gamma irradiation. Two genomic clones, rad26+ and cds1+, were found to suppress the hydroxyurea sensitivity of the aya14 mutant. Genetic analysis indicates that aya14 is a novel allele of the cell cycle checkpoint gene rad26+, which we have named rad26.a14. cds1+ is a suppressor which suppresses the S-phase feedback control defect of rad26.a14 when S phase is inhibited by either hydroxyurea or cdc22, but it does not suppress the defect when S phase is arrested by a mutant DNA polymerase. Analyses of rad26.a14 in a variety of cdc mutant backgrounds indicate that strains containing rad26.a14 bypass S-phase arrest but not G1 or late S/G2 arrest. A model of how Rad26 monitors S-phase progression to maintain the dependency of cell cycle events and coordinates with other rad/hus checkpoint gene products in responding to radiation damage is proposed.


EMBO Reports ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nianxiang Zhang ◽  
Ramandeep Kaur ◽  
Shamima Akhter ◽  
Randy J Legerski

DNA Repair ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1264-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Carrozza ◽  
Donna F. Stefanick ◽  
Julie K. Horton ◽  
Padmini S. Kedar ◽  
Samuel H. Wilson

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Weiss ◽  
Philip Leder ◽  
Cyrus Vaziri

ABSTRACT Mouse Hus1 encodes an evolutionarily conserved DNA damage response protein. In this study we examined how targeted deletion of Hus1 affects cell cycle checkpoint responses to genotoxic stress. Unlike hus1− fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, which are defective for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint, Hus1-null mouse cells did not inappropriately enter mitosis following genotoxin treatment. However, Hus1-deficient cells displayed a striking S-phase DNA damage checkpoint defect. Whereas wild-type cells transiently repressed DNA replication in response to benzo(a)pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE), a genotoxin that causes bulky DNA adducts, Hus1-null cells maintained relatively high levels of DNA synthesis following treatment with this agent. However, when treated with DNA strand break-inducing agents such as ionizing radiation (IR), Hus1-deficient cells showed intact S-phase checkpoint responses. Conversely, checkpoint-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to BPDE did not require NBS1, a component of the IR-responsive S-phase checkpoint pathway. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Hus1 is required specifically for one of two separable mammalian checkpoint pathways that respond to distinct forms of genome damage during S phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document