scholarly journals Identification and Characterization of a Novel cAMP Receptor Protein in the CyanobacteriumSynechocystissp. PCC 6803

2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (9) ◽  
pp. 6241-6245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehisa Yoshimura ◽  
Toru Hisabori ◽  
Shuichi Yanagisawa ◽  
Masayuki Ohmori
2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehisa Yoshimura ◽  
Shizue Yoshihara ◽  
Shinobu Okamoto ◽  
Masahiko Ikeuchi ◽  
Masayuki Ohmori

FEBS Letters ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 563 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Omagari ◽  
Hidehisa Yoshimura ◽  
Mitsunori Takano ◽  
Dongyun Hao ◽  
Masayuki Ohmori ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 200 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Yu Song ◽  
Sha-Sha Zang ◽  
Zheng-Ke Li ◽  
Guo-Zheng Dai ◽  
Ke Liu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTwo cAMP receptor proteins (CRPs), Sycrp1 (encoded bysll1371) and Sycrp2 (encoded bysll1924), exist in the cyanobacteriumSynechocystissp. strain PCC 6803. Previous studies have demonstrated that Sycrp1 has binding affinity for cAMP and is involved in motility by regulating the formation of pili. However, the function of Sycrp2 remains unknown. Here, we report thatsycrp2disruption results in the loss of motility ofSynechocystissp. PCC 6803, and that the phenotype can be recovered by reintroducing thesycrp2gene into the genome ofsycrp2-disrupted mutants. Electron microscopy showed that thesycrp2-disrupted mutant lost the pilus apparatus on the cell surface, resulting in a lack of cell motility. Furthermore, the transcript level of thepilA9-pilA11operon (essential for cell motility and regulated by the cAMP receptor protein Sycrp1) was markedly decreased insycrp2-disrupted mutants compared with the wild-type strain. Moreover, yeast two-hybrid analysis and a pulldown assay demonstrated that Sycrp2 interacted with Sycrp1 to form a heterodimer and that Sycrp1 and Sycrp2 interacted with themselves to form homodimers. Gel mobility shift assays revealed that Sycrp1 specifically binds to the upstream region ofpilA9. Together, these findings indicate that inSynechocystissp. PCC 6803, Sycrp2 regulates the formation of pili and cell motility by interacting with Sycrp1.IMPORTANCEcAMP receptor proteins (CRPs) are widely distributed in cyanobacteria and play important roles in regulating gene expression. Although many cyanobacterial species have two cAMP receptor-like proteins, the functional links between them are unknown. Here, we found that Sycrp2 in the cyanobacteriumSynechocystissp. strain PCC 6803 is essential for twitching motility and that it interacts with Sycrp1, a known cAMP receptor protein involved with twitching motility. Our findings indicate that the two cAMP receptor-like proteins in cyanobacteria do not have functional redundancy but rather work together.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rinaldo ◽  
G. Giardina ◽  
M. Brunori ◽  
F. Cutruzzolà

In denitrifying bacteria, the concentration of NO is maintained low by a tight control of the expression and activity of nitrite and NO reductases. Regulation involves redox-linked transcription factors, such as those belonging to the CRP-FNR (cAMP receptor protein–fumarate and nitrate reductase regulator) superfamily, which act as oxygen and N-oxide sensors. Given that few members of this superfamily have been characterized in detail, we have cloned, expressed and purified the dissimilative nitrate respiration regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. To gain insights on the structural properties of the dissimilative nitrate respiration regulator, we have also determined the aggregation state of the purified protein and its ability to bind hydrophobic compounds such as 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulphonic acid.


1983 ◽  
Vol 258 (11) ◽  
pp. 6979-6983 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Rangel-Aldao ◽  
G Tovar ◽  
M Ledezma de Ruiz

1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document