Code-Mixing in Moeder-Kind Interactie in Dove Families

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 49-63
Author(s):  
Anne Baker ◽  
Beppie van den Bogaerde

In this article, we discuss the mixed input offered by four profoundly deaf mothers and the mixed output of their deaf and hearing children. Muysken (2000) distinguishes different forms of code-mixing: insertion, alternation and congruent lexicalisation. We applied these definitions to these language data and found that the mothers used mainly the last type of code-mixing, namely congruent lexicalisation. This results in a mixed form of NGT (Nederlandse Gebarentaal, 'Dutch Sign Language') and Dutch, in which the structure of the utterance is grammatical in both NGT and Dutch. Lexical insertion also occurs, both in the basically NGT utterances and in the Dutch utterances. The deaf children (up to age three) are just beginning to become bilingual and hardly produce any mixed utterances. The hearing children, on the other hand, clearly show that they code-mix, under the influence of the language input.

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beppie van denBogaerde ◽  
Anne Baker

In this paper we discuss the mixed language input of four deaf mothers and the mixed output of their three deaf and three hearing children. Taking a strict definition of code-mixing (as defined by Muysken 2000) we find that the deaf mothers mainly use a form of code-mixing, or mixed code-blending, called congruent lexicalization, which results in a mixed form between NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands) and Dutch in a structure which is compatible with both NGT and Dutch. The deaf children (up to 3 years), who are only just beginning to become bilingual, hardly produce any code-mixed utterances. The hearing children, however, are clearly bilingual in NGT and Dutch, and use code-blending of the mixed type in more or less the same form as their mother does.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-647
Author(s):  
Meredith L. Rowe

The study of gesture, especially its relationship to spoken and signed languages, has become a broadly studied topic for researchers from various fields, including neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, evolutionary psychology, human development, and communication disorders. One possible reason for the wide interest in gesture is its universality. People of all ages and cultures use gestures for various purposes. Young language-learning, hearing children often use gestures alone or in combination with speech to help express themselves to their interlocutors, for example, pointing to a desired object while saying “mine.” As a more striking example, deaf children in Nicaragua who had previously been unexposed to any conventional sign language, used gestures to develop home-sign systems that eventually developed into Nicaraguan Sign Language (Kegl, Senghas, & Coppola, 1999). On the other hand, gestures are often used in situations where the underlying purpose of the gesture is less clear. For example, people who are blind from birth are nonetheless found to gesture in conversation (Iverson & Goldin-Meadow, 1997), and adults gesture frequently, and often subconsciously, during conversations with one another. Despite their omnipresence, we know relatively little about gestures' origins, their relationship to language, and, in some instances, the purposes they serve.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beppie van den Bogaerde ◽  
Anne Baker

In this paper we discuss the mixed language input of four deaf mothers and the mixed output of their three deaf and three hearing children. Taking a strict definition of code-mixing (as defined by Muysken 2000) we find that the deaf mothers mainly use a form of code-mixing, or mixed code-blending, called congruent lexicalization, which results in a mixed form between NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands) and Dutch in a structure which is compatible with both NGT and Dutch. The deaf children (up to 3 years), who are only just beginning to become bilingual, hardly produce any code-mixed utterances. The hearing children, however, are clearly bilingual in NGT and Dutch, and use code-blending of the mixed type in more or less the same form as their mother does.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Becker

Hearing children acquire discourse competences like storytelling through everyday interaction and are systematically supported in this process by adults. In contrast, deaf children in Germany often lack appropriate interlocutors with German Sign Language proficiency in family or school. The focus of our research is on narrative competences in deaf children and on the consequences of the lack of interlocutors on the acquisition of these competences. We carried out three studies to examine narrative skills of deaf children aged 8 to 17. We collected data from dyadic conversations with deaf adults and analyzed this data against the background of a cognitive approach to language acquisition and of conversation analysis. From a developmental perspective, our results indicate that the narrative competences of most of the tested non-native signing children have not developed as would be appropriate for their age. From an interactive perspective, deaf adults cooperate with the children in telling their stories by using different strategies.


Bastina ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 513-535
Author(s):  
Tamara Kovačević ◽  
Ljubica Isaković

This study analyses the process of adopting of the sign language with deaf and hard of hearing preschool children in the context of the result of linguistic and psycholinguistic research. The importance of the sign language is emphasized and its historical development is analyzed. It is pointed to the significance of the critical period for the adoption and the learning of the sign and spoken language with deaf and hard of hearing preschool children. The sign language is natural and primary linguistic expression of deaf children. Deaf and hard of hearing children are exposed to the sign and spoken language, they have better understanding and linguistic production than the children who are only exposed to the spoken language. Bilingualism involves the knowledge and the regular use of the sign language, which is used by the deaf community, and of the spoken language, which is used by the hearing majority. Children at the preschool age should be enabled to continue to adopt the language they started to adopt within the family (the sign language or the spoken language). Children will adopt the best both linguistic modalities through the interaction with other fluent speakers (the adults and children).


Author(s):  
Clélia Nogueira ◽  
Edna Machado

Tem como propósito analisar os resultados de pesquisas realizadas com crianças surdas acerca do desenvolvimento cognitivo, com base na teoria psicogenética de Jean Piaget. A primeira teve como objetivo investigar o desenvolvimento das estruturas de classificação, seriação e conservação do número em crianças surdas em idade pré-escolar. A segunda avaliou o desenvolvimento de crianças surdas com idade variando entre 12 e 14 anos, ou seja, as estruturas referentes aos períodos operatório-concreto e operatório-formal, segundo a teoria psicogenética. Uma terceira pesquisa, desenvolvida sob a orientação de uma das pesquisadoras, tinha como objetivo verificar se as crianças surdas educadas sob a concepção bilíngüe apresentavam diferenças no desenvolvimento cognitivo em relação àquelas examinadas nas duas anteriores. Todas as três pesquisas foram desenvolvidas a partir do método clínico tal como idealizado por Piaget. A análise dos resultados nos permite afirmar que a tese piagetiana da insuficiência da linguagem para a construção das estruturas cognitivas está confirmada em nossos estudos, mas, por outro lado, podemos dizer que os resultados nos apontam para a existência de outros fatores que precisam ser compreendidos no desenvolvimento cognitivo do surdo. A adoção da língua de sinais é um avanço na concepção da surdez e, com certeza, permite ao surdo ampliar seu universo de relações afetivas e sociais com seus pares, mas entendemos que a adoção da abordagem bilíngüe não é a solução definitiva para a educação dos surdos. Apesar de ser imprescindível que os surdos aprendam, o mais cedo possível, uma língua de sinais, a sua educação, nos parece, necessita ainda de um cuidado especial. Palavras-chave: surdez; desenvolvimento cognitivo dos surdos; bilingüismo. Abstract Results from research with deaf children and their cognitive development are analyzed by Piaget's psychogenetic theory. Whereas the first research investigated the development of classification, series listing and number conservation in pre-school deaf children, the second evaluated the development of 12-14-year-old deaf children, or rather, the structures comprising the concrete operatory and formal operatory periods of the psychogenetic theory. A third research, undertaken by one of the authors, verified whether deaf children who received bilingual education showed any differences in cognitive development in contrast to those in the former two researches. The three researches have been developed according to Piaget's clinical method. Results show that our analysis confirmed Piaget's thesis of language insufficiency for the construction of cognitive structures. On the other hand, results also indicate other factors that must be understood with regard to deaf people's cognitive development. The use of the natural language for the deaf, or sign language, is a landmark in the knowledge on deafness and will help deaf people to broaden their affective and social relationships with their peers. The adoption of the bilingual approach will not be the definite solution for the education of deaf people. Although deaf people must learn sign language as early as possible, special care should be dispensed in the course of their educational formation. Keywords: deafness; cognitive development of deaf people; bilingualism.


Author(s):  
Jon Henner ◽  
Robert Hoffmeister ◽  
Jeanne Reis

Limited choices exist for assessing the signed language development of deaf and hard of hearing children. Over the past 30 years, the American Sign Language Assessment Instrument (ASLAI) has been one of the top choices for norm-referenced assessment of deaf and hard of hearing children who use American Sign Language. Signed language assessments can also be used to evaluate the effects of a phenomenon known as language deprivation, which tends to affect deaf children. They can also measure the effects of impoverished and idiosyncratic nonstandard signs and grammar used by educators of the deaf and professionals who serve the Deaf community. This chapter discusses what was learned while developing the ASLAI and provides guidelines for educators and researchers of the deaf who seek to develop their own signed language assessments.


Author(s):  
Marc Marschark ◽  
Harry G. Lang ◽  
John A. Albertini

To understand the complex relations between language and learning, we have to look at both how children learn language and what it is that they learn that allows them to communicate with others. To accomplish this, we need to distinguish between apparent differences in language that are related to the modality of communication and actual differences in language fluencies observed among deaf children. It also will help to examine some relevant differences between deaf children and hearing children. We have already pointed out that the distinction between spoken language and sign language, while a theoretically important one for researchers, is an oversimplification for most practical purposes. It is rare that deaf children are exposed only to spoken language or sign language, even if that is the intention of their parents or teachers. According to 1999 data, approximately 55 percent of deaf children in the United States are formally educated in programs that report either using sign language exclusively (just over 5 percent) or signed and spoken language together (just over 49 percent) (Gallaudet University, Center for Applied Demographic Statistics). Because almost half of all deaf children in the United States are missed in such surveys, however, these numbers only should be taken as approximate. Comparisons of the language abilities of deaf children who primarily use sign language with those who primarily use spoken language represent one of the most popular and potentially informative areas in research relating to language development and academic success. Unfortunately, this area is also one of the most complex. Educational programs emphasizing spoken or sign language often have different educational philosophies and curricula as well as different communication philosophies. Programs may only admit children with particular histories of early intervention, and parents will be drawn to different programs for a variety of reasons. Differences observed between children from any two programs thus might be the result of a number of variables rather than, or in addition to, language modality per se. Even when deaf children are educated in spoken language environments, they often develop systems of gestural communication with their parents (Greenberg et al., 1984).


1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura S. McKirdy ◽  
Marion Blank

The language interactions of pairs of preschool-age deaf and preschool-age hearing children were recorded in play sessions and analyzed according to a system for assessing dialogue that has been developed by the second author, In the system, each person over the course of a dialogue is seen its playing two roles: one as speaker-initiator (who puts forth ideas) the other as speaker-responder (who responds to the ideas that have been put forth by the partner in the dialogue). The results indicated that both roles were used by the deaf and the hearing dyads, but their pattern of performance was different. As speaker-initiators, the deaf children displayed it narrower range of complexity in their utterances. As speaker-responders, they were less likely to respond to utterances of their partners, particularly those utterances in the form of comments, and they more readily showed difficulties in responding appropriately its their partner's initiations increased in complexity. The discussion focuses on the implications of viewing language performance within a communication framework.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document