Phenotypic variation and environmental effects.

Author(s):  
R. A. Dunham
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
A Wolc ◽  
I White ◽  
M Lisowski ◽  
W G Hill

Under the animal model genetic variance is estimated in the base population taking into account inbreeding and is otherwise assumed to remain unchanged over generations. In practice, phenotypic variation differs randomly or systematically over time. Intuitively, such changes would be attributed mostly to environmental effects, and so lower heritability would be expected when variation is inflated. Studies in dairy cattle show contradictory results (e.g. Boldman and Freeman, 1990). Laying hens are kept under environmental conditions intended to be constant, but show substantial heterogeneity in phenotypic variance (VP) over generations. The aim was to investigate how variance components change.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 2471-2484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Westberg ◽  
Shachar Ohali ◽  
Anatoly Shevelevich ◽  
Pinchas Fine ◽  
Oz Barazani

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 2624-2628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hendricks

Variation in size and shape of American Pipit (Anthus rubescens) eggs was studied from 1987 to 1989 at two sites in the Beartooth Mountains, Park County, Wyoming. Differences in four egg traits were detected within clutches among females for all years and at both sites; there were differences between years and sites as well. Coefficients of variation for clutch means ranged from 1.52 (breadth) to 5.02 (volume). Mean repeatability estimates (± SD) of four independent samples were 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.64 ± 0.08, 0.70 ± 0.10, and 0.70 ± 0.08 for length, breadth, volume, and elongation, respectively, suggesting a significant heritable component in the phenotypic variation of egg size and shape. The difference between mean length and breadth repeatabilities was significant (P < 0.02). Repeatabilities of volume were the most variable of all traits and varied between years by as much as 22%, and between sites in 1989 by as much as 19%. Site differences are probably due to local environmental effects, and not a result of differences in the underlying genotypic variance. Repeatability estimates for American Pipit eggs were similar to those for a variety of bird species breeding in very different habitats. However, repeatability estimates can be calculated several ways and caution should be used when comparing estimates until it can be shown that these estimates are comparable for the same population.


Author(s):  
N.J. Tao ◽  
J.A. DeRose ◽  
P.I. Oden ◽  
S.M. Lindsay

Clemmer and Beebe have pointed out that surface structures on graphite substrates can be misinterpreted as biopolymer images in STM experiments. We have been using electrochemical methods to react DNA fragments onto gold electrodes for STM and AFM imaging. The adsorbates produced in this way are only homogeneous in special circumstances. Searching an inhomogeneous substrate for ‘desired’ images limits the value of the data. Here, we report on a reversible method for imaging adsorbates. The molecules can be lifted onto and off the substrate during imaging. This leaves no doubt about the validity or statistical significance of the images. Furthermore, environmental effects (such as changes in electrolyte or surface charge) can be investigated easily.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document