Vice, On the Basis of Sex, and the Liberal Imagination: Villainification and Heroification in Popular Political Film

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-82
Author(s):  
Wayne Journell
Author(s):  
Fredric Jameson

Polski przekład klasycznego artykułu Fredrica Jamesona, opublikowanego po raz pierwszy w 1977 roku. Na przykładzie analizy filmu Pieskie popołudnie (1975, reż. Sidney Lumet) autor proponuje metodę odczytywania dzieła filmowego jako alegorii relacji klasowych. Przygląda się w tym celu elementom fabuły filmu, jego aspektom gatunkowym i formalnym oraz usytuowaniu względem systemu produkcji obrazów w Hollywood i telewizji tamtego czasu. Podstawa przekładu: „Class and Allegory in Contemporary Mass Culture: Dog Day Afternoon as a Political Film”, College English, Vol. 38, No. 8 (1977): 843-859.


Plaridel ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-112
Author(s):  
Rosemarie O. Roque

Sineng Bayan (People’s Cinema) is a salient part of Philippine alternative cinema, which is in stark contrast to the dominant commercial cinema. It is an important aspect in the pursuit of a more serious Philippine cinema. Political film collectives that arose in the early 1980s and flourished during the Marcos dictatorship gave way to Sineng Bayan. This article focuses on the archival audiovisual works of AsiaVisions Media Foundation (AVMF), a non-government organization which primarily utilized film documentaries in its propaganda-education work, and Alternative Horizons (AlterHorizons), the first media cooperative in the country. This study on Sineng Bayan and the Archives forwards the discourse on film as an effective cultural weapon of the Filipino people in their struggle for national freedom and genuine democracy. Capturing the people’s experiences and struggles through audio-visual presentations, videos, and films, the works of these political film collectives are part of the collective memory and documentary heritage of the country.


2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Ion Indolean ◽  
◽  

"This article tries to understand what type of film is approved by the Nicolae Ceauşescu regime and how it is promoted, through various propaganda channels. In this sense, we choose to discuss the film made by the artistic couple Manole Marcus - Titus Popovici, The Power and The Truth (1972), and we resort to a content analysis to understand the way it was made. We are also interested in the echoes of the film in the press of the time and how with the help of newspaper articles the authorities inoculate the idea that this film is the most important cinematographic achievement of the moment, a benchmark for political productions to be made from that point on. Keywords: Cinematography, Political Film, Nicolae Ceauşescu, Manole Marcus, Titus Popovici, Propaganda "


Author(s):  
Kamil Minkner

The purpose of the paper is to reflection on the status of political film and the political status of film. It is about proposing boundary categories that can provide a theoretical basis in detailed analyzes of the film’s political core. The political nature of the films has been filtered, in the article, by the concept of circulation of meanings in the cultural circuit of Paul du Gay, Stuart Hall and others. This approach shows that the specific political significance of the film is not simply given, but is constructed and understood differently at the level of different instances of social communication: producers, creators, audiences, film critics, creators of advertising messages, etc. The author of the article assumed that the political status of the film is associated not with specific political references, but with modality of film. Two types of film were presented: as a work and social practice. It was only in this context that specific variants of the political film were ordered.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-168
Author(s):  
Catherine Rottenberg
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document