scholarly journals What Does the DAP:IQ Measure?: Drawing Comparisons between Drawing Performance and Developmental Assessments

2017 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn Rehrig ◽  
Karin Stromswold
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres De Los Reyes

AbstractDevelopmental psychopathology researchers and practitioners commonly conduct behavioral assessments using multiple informants' reports (e.g., parents, teachers, practitioners, children, and laboratory observers). These assessments often yield inconsistent conclusions about important questions in developmental psychopathology research, depending on the informant (e.g., psychiatric diagnoses and risk factors of disorder). Researchers have theorized why informant discrepancies exist and advanced methodological models of informant discrepancies. However, over 50 years of empirical data has uncovered little knowledge about these discrepancies beyond that they exist, complicate interpretations of research findings and assessment outcomes in practice, and correlate with some characteristics of the informants providing reports (e.g., demographics and mood levels). Further, recent studies often yield take-home messages about the importance of taking a multi-informant approach to clinical and developmental assessments. Researchers draw these conclusions from their work, despite multi-informant approaches to assessment long being a part of best practices in clinical and developmental assessments. Consequently, developmental psychopathology researchers and practitioners are in dire need of a focused set of research priorities with the key goal of rapidly advancing knowledge about informant discrepancies. In this paper, I discuss these research priorities, review work indicating the feasibility of conducting research addressing these priorities, and specify what researchers and practitioners would gain from studies advancing knowledge about informant discrepancies in developmental psychopathology research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e26-e27
Author(s):  
Lea Restivo ◽  
Gurpreet Khaira ◽  
Amonpreet Sandhu ◽  
Susan Kuhn

Abstract Background The circumstance in which internationally adopted children are born and live prior to adoption put them at high risk for health issues. Nearly all adoptees have complex medical conditions, the most common being cleft lip/palate, orthopaedic problems, infectious diseases, congenital heart diseases, and/or nutritional deficiencies, as well as cognitive impairments, and/or developmental delays. Specifically, nearly all institutionalized children will have expressive language delays and most will have motor delays. Although improvement can be seen with time, most do not attain their full potential. Additionally, by nature of adoption, all children experience trauma. In some situations, this will be further compounded by neglect and/or abuse faced prior to adoption, or during institutionalization. Consequently, almost all adoptees develop attachment difficulties. Trained medical professionals are required to screen, monitor, and provide management suggestions for this complex and unique population. Objectives To our knowledge, parental experience of an international adoption clinic has not yet been published. This parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic, provides insights that may help guide provision of care for this high-risk population in our centre, throughout the country, and internationally. Design/Methods A qualitative, exploratory design was employed using telephone interviews of eighteen parents of adoptees assessed by a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic since 2010. This approach was chosen to allow for more extensive exploration of parental experience, and to identify barriers and facilitators of care. Interviews were 30 to 90 minutes, semi-structured, and transcribed verbatim. Field notes were made during the interviews to note intonation and major concerns, and were used to supplement transcripts during data analysis. Questions covered experiences with pre-adoption counselling, arranging the first clinic visit, health and developmental assessments, life after clinic discharge, and general comments/suggestions. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts using Maguire’s step-by-step guide. Results Analysis resulted in four main themes and seven subthemes. The first theme was “difficulty of international adoption”. The second theme “utility and impact of services offered” was subdivided into “pre-adoption counselling”, “clinic visits and medical assessments”, and “post adoption seminars”. The third theme “the administrative procedures of the clinic” was subdivided into “timing and ease of organizing a first visit”, and “hours of operation”. The final theme “gaps in care” was divided into “ongoing difficulty with attachment”, and “allied healthcare services”. These results demonstrate that parents of internationally adopted children often feel overwhelmed by the medical needs of their children and feel unsupported. They recommend comprehensive and in-person pre-adoption counselling with standard referral processes to ensure timely access to care. Post-arrival medical and developmental assessments should be flexible and complete. Most importantly, clinics should incorporate support from allied healthcare professionals, including social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy. In particular, parents were interested in further management of attachment. Conclusion This first parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic provides insights that may help guide provision of care to this high-risk population in centres across Canada and internationally.


1975 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 341-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan B. Chase

To effectively plan for services for young handicapped children, early objective developmental assessments are necessary. Although caution must be exercised in their use, assessment measures for infants can help to prevent, ameliorate, or uncover the difficulties that the handicapped child might face. By using a battery of assessments, a profile of the child's abilities, strengths, weaknesses, and disabilities is yielded.


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea Fraser Gupta ◽  
Chris Brebner ◽  
Helen Chandler Yeo

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e51-e52
Author(s):  
Madelyn Barton ◽  
Marie-Noëlle Simard ◽  
Sandra Reiter-Campeau ◽  
Genevieve Lupien ◽  
Marie-Pierre Lamothe ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Infants with childhood-onset epilepsies, including epileptic encephalopathies, are at high risk of developmental challenges such as motor and language delays. There has been a growing focus on developmental screening instruments due to the association between delayed development and long-term adverse outcomes, including negative impacts on health-related quality of life, school achievement and social participation. Therefore, children with developmental delays should be referred as early as possible to rehabilitation services such as occupational, physical, or speech therapy. Developmental screening using standardized tools is recommended in order to identify the high-risk children that require additional developmental assessments. The Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ), a parent-completed developmental screening tool, is one of the more cited and recommended developmental screening tools. However, its utility in children with early-onset epilepsy has yet to be validated. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the validity of the ASQ for identifying children with new-onset epilepsy who require further professional developmental rehabilitation. DESIGN/METHODS Fifty infants (25 males) with seizure onset under 3 years of age were prospectively recruited. Parents completed the ASQ-3 before the first clinic appointment. The ASQ-3 evaluates 5 domains of development. An ASQ score below 2 standard deviations (SD) on any one of the domains was considered abnormal. Once completed, all infants were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including neurologists, occupational therapists, and physical therapists to determine if they should be referred for further rehabilitation interventions. Accuracy of the ASQ was calculated in terms of sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS Mean age at the initial evaluation was 13.1 months (SD=8.22). Among the 50 infants, 36 (72%) received a score <-2 SD in at least one domain of the ASQ and 43 (86%) were referred for further rehabilitation services after the multidisciplinary assessment. The ASQ had a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 71%, a PPV of 93% and a NPV of 36% in identifying children with new-onset epilepsy who would require further rehabilitation services. CONCLUSION The ASQ, a well-known parent-completed developmental screening tool, when abnormal shows adequate validity for the identification of children with early-onset epilepsy who require developmental assessments and interventions by rehabilitation professionals. Our results also provide further evidence that development delay is the rule rather than the exception in infants with new onset epilepsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document