A focus on disciplinary language: Bringing critical perspectives to reading and writing in science

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
Jason Moore ◽  
Mary Schleppegrell
Keyword(s):  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Writing In Science ◽  
Critical Perspectives

Reading and Writing Research Located in the Literary

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-271
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Pelias
Keyword(s):  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Writing Research ◽  
Critical Perspectives

In this essay I identify the obligations I feel as a reader and writer who celebrates the literary as a researcher. I structure the piece by asking a series of questions from my writer and reader stances to put on display the relational dynamic between readers and writers and to imply how the literary in research might come into play. I end the essay in the hope that my readers will offer additional questions to my questions, inquiries that will not easily settle into a satisfying narrative, by considering their critical perspectives as readers and writers who work with the literary in their research.

scholarly journals Efeitos de sentido sobre transgênicos produzidos a partir da transformação nas condições de produção de leitura

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-193
Author(s):  
Alberto Lopo Montalvão Neto ◽  
Elisabeth Barolli
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Political Issues ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Scientific Controversies ◽  
The Face ◽  
Writing In Science ◽  
Socially Relevant ◽  
Undergraduate Science ◽  
Production Conditions

Resumo: Reflexões relativas à Ciência e à Tecnologia têm se pautado no entorno de questões socialmente relevantes. Assim, além de colocar como fundamental um olhar para as relações entre tais eixos e a Sociedade, no presente trabalho, demonstramos como uma atividade baseada na leitura e na escrita no Ensino de Ciências, que visa autonomia e tomada de decisões, pode gerar outras compreensões por licenciandos em Ciências Biológicas. Analisamos os efeitos de sentido produzidos após ocorrer mudanças nas condições de produção de leitura, por meio do contato desses sujeitos com tipos textuais diversos. Nosso intuito foi compreender como se dão os seus posicionamentos frente as controvérsias científicas, mais especificamente no que se refere aos alimentos transgênicos. Para tal finalidade, analisamos produções textuais dissertativas, e observamos a ocorrência de mudanças nas condições de produção influenciaram a produção de sentidos dos licenciandos de/sobre transgenia, bem como em relação às controvérsias e questões sociopolíticas concernentes.Palavras-chave: CTS; Controvérsias Científicas; Análise de Discurso; Transgênicos. Meaning effects on transgenics produced from transformation in reading production conditions Abstract: Reflections on Science and Technology have been based on socially relevant issues. In addition to placing as crucial a look at the relationships between those axes and the Society, in the present work, we demonstrate how an activity based on reading and writing in Science Teaching, which aims at autonomy and decision making, can generate other understandings by undergraduate science Biological students. We analyze the meaning effects produced after changes in the conditions of reading production, through the contact of these subjects with different textual types. Our aim was to understand how their positions take place in the face of scientific controversies, more specifically with regard to transgenic foods. Analyzing textual dissertation productions, we observed that changes in production conditions influenced the production of senses of the undergraduate students on/about transgenics, as well as in relation to the controversies and socio-political issues involved.Keywords: STS; Scientific Controversies; Discourse Analysis; Transgenics.  

USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING TO IMPROVE READING AND WRITING IN SCIENCE

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Nesbit ◽  
Cynthia A. Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Writing In Science

scholarly journals Scientific literacy as social practice: Implications for reading and writing in science classrooms

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gard Ove Sørvik ◽  
Sonja M. Mork
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Social Practice ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Sociocultural Perspective ◽  
Science Classrooms ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Writing In Science ◽  
Literacy As Social Practice

This article provides an introduction to what it means to adopt a view of literacy as social practice for science education. This view of literacy builds on the idea that reading and writing are best regarded as situated social practices involving text, not as a set of decontextualised and universally applicable skills. First, we draw on sociocultural perspectives on literacy to show how these perspectives inform our understanding of literacy when the context is science. Second, we use related research literature, mainly concerning the role of text in science education, to present a framework for approaching literacy in science classrooms from a sociocultural perspective. Finally, we discuss how a social view of literacy enables us to consider how literacy occurs in contexts relevant to a transcending science subject for scientific literacy.

Writing in Aphasia Rehabilitation: Cursive vs Manuscript

1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Boone ◽  
Harold M. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Correct Response ◽  
The Other ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Writing Style ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Manual Responses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Written Form ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Read Number

Reading and writing performance was observed in 30 adult aphasic patients to determine whether there was a significant difference when stimuli and manual responses were varied in the written form: cursive versus manuscript. Patients were asked to read aloud 10 words written cursively and 10 words written in manuscript form. They were then asked to write on dictation 10 word responses using cursive writing and 10 words using manuscript writing. Number of words correctly read, number of words correctly written, and number of letters correctly written in the proper sequence were tallied for both cursive and manuscript writing tasks for each patient. Results indicated no significant difference in correct response between cursive and manuscript writing style for these aphasic patients as a group; however, it was noted that individual patients varied widely in their success using one writing form over the other. It appeared that since neither writing form showed better facilitation of performance, the writing style used should be determined according to the individual patient’s own preference and best performance.

Research on Reading: What SLPs Want (or Need) to Know

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Montgomery
Keyword(s):  
Spoken Language ◽  
Cognitive Skill ◽  
Language Intervention ◽  
Reading Teachers ◽  
Successful Therapy ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Reading Research ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Language Problems

Abstract As increasing numbers of speech language pathologists (SLPs) have embraced their burgeoning roles in written as well as spoken language intervention, they have recognized that there is much to be gained from the research in reading. While some SLPs reportedly fear they will “morph” into reading teachers, many more are confidently aware that SLPs who work with adult clients routinely use reading as one of their rehabilitation modalities. Reading functions as both a tool to reach language in adults, and as a measure of successful therapy. This advanced cognitive skill can serve the same purpose for children. Language is the foundational support to reading. Consequently spoken language problems are often predictors of reading and writing challenges that may be ahead for the student (Juel & Deffes, 2004; Moats, 2001; Wallach, 2004). A targeted review of reading research may assist the SLP to appreciate the language/reading interface.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document