Extracting spectral albedo from NOAA-9 AVHRR multiple view data using an atmospheric correction procedure and an expert system

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. KIMES ◽  
B. N. HOLBEN
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schläpfer ◽  
Jan Biesemans ◽  
Andreas Hueni ◽  
Koen Meuleman

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. V. Nagamani ◽  
T. Preethi Latha ◽  
K. H. Rao ◽  
T. Suresh ◽  
S. B. Choudhury ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihua Mao ◽  
Delu Pan ◽  
Haiqing Huang

Author(s):  
H.J. Dudek

The chemical inhomogenities in modern materials such as fibers, phases and inclusions, often have diameters in the region of one micrometer. Using electron microbeam analysis for the determination of the element concentrations one has to know the smallest possible diameter of such regions for a given accuracy of the quantitative analysis.In th is paper the correction procedure for the quantitative electron microbeam analysis is extended to a spacial problem to determine the smallest possible measurements of a cylindrical particle P of high D (depth resolution) and diameter L (lateral resolution) embeded in a matrix M and which has to be analysed quantitative with the accuracy q. The mathematical accounts lead to the following form of the characteristic x-ray intens ity of the element i of a particle P embeded in the matrix M in relation to the intensity of a standard S


Author(s):  
John T. Armstrong

One of the most cited papers in the geological sciences has been that of Albee and Bence on the use of empirical " α -factors" to correct quantitative electron microprobe data. During the past 25 years this method has remained the most commonly used correction for geological samples, despite the facts that few investigators have actually determined empirical α-factors, but instead employ tables of calculated α-factors using one of the conventional "ZAF" correction programs; a number of investigators have shown that the assumption that an α-factor is constant in binary systems where there are large matrix corrections is incorrect (e.g, 2-3); and the procedure’s desirability in terms of program size and computational speed is much less important today because of developments in computing capabilities. The question thus exists whether it is time to honorably retire the Bence-Albee procedure and turn to more modern, robust correction methods. This paper proposes that, although it is perhaps time to retire the original Bence-Albee procedure, it should be replaced by a similar method based on compositiondependent polynomial α-factor expressions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document