Were They Illegal Rioters or Pro-democracy Protestors? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong Protests in China Daily and The New York Times

Critical Arts ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Guofeng Wang ◽  
Xueqin Ma
Author(s):  
Shujun Wan

News headlines play an important role in attracting readers’ attention. By comparing 200 online news headlines collected from the New York Times and China Daily online, this paper aims at finding out the difference in linguistic complexity of English online news headlines in a native English speaking country and a non native English speaking country. <p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/edu_01/0710/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>


1969 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Sibo Chen

This paper reports a comparative analysis of the news coverage of the 2011 Libyan civil war in two national media (China Daily and The New York Times). The 2011 Libyan civil war attracted wide attention and was extensively covered by various media around the world. However, news discourse regarding the war was constructed differently across various news agencies as a result of their clashing ideologies. Based on corpus linguistics methods, two small corpora with a total of 22,412 tokens were compiled and the comparative analyses of the two corpora revealed the following results. First, although the two corpora shared a lot of commonalities in word frequency, differences still exist in several high ranking lemmas. On the one hand, words such as “Qaddafi” and “war” ranked similarly in the two corpora’s lexical frequency lists; on the other hand, the frequencies of the lemma “rebel/rebels” were much higher in The New York Times corpus than in the China Daily corpus, which indicated that the image of the rebel received more attention in the reports by The New York Times than in those by China Daily. Second, although the word “Qaddafi” achieved similar frequencies in the two corpora, a follow-up collocation analysis showed that the images of “Qaddafi” contrasted with each other in the two corpora. In The New York Times corpus, the words and phrases collocating with “Qaddafi” were mainly negative descriptions and highlighted the pressure on Qaddafi whereas many neutral and even positive descriptions of Qaddafi appeared in the China Daily corpus. Based on these findings, the paper further discusses how discursive devices are applied in news coverage of warfare, as well as some methodological implications of the case study (Reprinted by Permission of Canadian Association for the Studies of Discourse and Writing).


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kuizi Ma ◽  
Ya Xiao

In recent years, as China&rsquo;s largest smartphone company, Huawei&rsquo;s position in the international market has gradually increased and received widespread attention from foreign media. The rapid development of China&rsquo;s impact on the hegemony of the US has also changed the direction of US media&rsquo;s reporting on Chinese companies. At this stage, it is meaningful to study the image of Huawei in both Chinese and US media reports. Therefore, based on the corpus approach and critical discourse analysis, this paper builds two corpora of China Daily (576 reports with 438,261 words) and The New York Times (429 reports with 347,025 words). It is found that (1) both sides acknowledge that Huawei ranks top in world telecommunication technology, particularly in the 5G network; (2) two newspapers focus on different aspects in their reports. For the Chinese media, Huawei&rsquo;s technological prowess, innovation capacity in the global market, cooperation with many other European and African countries are given more attention, while for the American media, more focus is shifted to Huawei&rsquo;s threat to national security; (3) two newspapers hold different attitudes towards the rise of Huawei. China Daily&rsquo;s positive construction of Huawei&rsquo;s image is obvious. While for the American media, the Trump administration is more likely to project a threatening image of Huawei; (4) the reporting frameworks and the styles of materials selected differ in two newspapers. China Daily&rsquo;s framework concentrates on &ldquo;Huawei&rdquo; itself, while The New York Times tends to construct a reporting framework from multiple perspectives from the third-party.


Critical Arts ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 68-86
Author(s):  
Liu Lihua ◽  
Zhang Cheng ◽  
Qian Jiahui

Author(s):  
Jingni Liu ◽  

On the basis of two corpora of political and economic terms and sentences with particular Chinese features from China Daily (English version) and The New York Times, ranging from August 2019 to January 2020, a comparable analysis is made to find out the strategy of rendering those words in the news together with their lexical features. Statistics reveal an overall foreignization tendency, along with various factors imposing impacts on the process, which is examined from the perspective of both translation and linguistics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Dan Zhang

This study examines the discursive construction of South China Sea dispute in China Daily and The New York Times from April 2016 to December 2017. Drawing on Van Dijk&rsquo;s account of critical discourse analysis and the linguistic framework of Appraisal theory (Martin &amp; White, 2005), this study investigates how three social actors in the dispute, namely China, United States, Philippines, are differently constructed with the strategic use of attitude resources in the two newspapers. The corpus analyzed consists of 45 newspaper texts from China Daily and 49 newspaper texts from The New York Times. The analysis reveals competing discursive construction of social actors that constitute positive us-representation and negative other-representation in the two newspapers. For example, China Daily constructs China as a peace-loving country, insisting on the peaceful means and the cooperation with ASEAN and other claimant countries to resolve the dispute, whereas The New York Times depicts China as threat, hegemony and provocation. Such competing discursive construction not only reflects the ideological stance of two newspapers, but also functions to legitimize their countries&rsquo; policies and decisions in the South China Sea dispute.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document