Functional analysis of high-content high-throughput imaging data

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1903-1919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqi Jiang ◽  
Steven Wink ◽  
Bob van de Water ◽  
Annette Kopp-Schneider
eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex X Lu ◽  
Yolanda T Chong ◽  
Ian Shen Hsu ◽  
Bob Strome ◽  
Louis-Francois Handfield ◽  
...  

The evaluation of protein localization changes on a systematic level is a powerful tool for understanding how cells respond to environmental, chemical, or genetic perturbations. To date, work in understanding these proteomic responses through high-throughput imaging has catalogued localization changes independently for each perturbation. To distinguish changes that are targeted responses to the specific perturbation or more generalized programs, we developed a scalable approach to visualize the localization behavior of proteins across multiple experiments as a quantitative pattern. By applying this approach to 24 experimental screens consisting of nearly 400,000 images, we differentiated specific responses from more generalized ones, discovered nuance in the localization behavior of stress-responsive proteins, and formed hypotheses by clustering proteins that have similar patterns. Previous approaches aim to capture all localization changes for a single screen as accurately as possible, whereas our work aims to integrate large amounts of imaging data to find unexpected new cell biology.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huichun Zhang ◽  
Yufeng Ge ◽  
Xinyan Xie ◽  
Abbas Atefi ◽  
Nuwan Wijewardane ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundLeaf chlorophyll content plays an important role in indicating plant stresses and nutrient status. Traditional approaches for the quantification of chlorophyll content mainly include acetone ethanol extraction, spectrophotometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Such destructive methods based on laboratory procedures are time consuming, expensive, and not suitable for high-throughput phenotyping. High throughput imaging techniques are now widely used for nondestructive analysis of plant phenotypic traits. In this study three imaging modules, namely, RGB, hyperspectral, and fluorescence imaging, were used to estimate chlorophyll content of sorghum plants in a greenhouse environment. Color features, spectral indices, and chlorophyll fluorescence intensity were extracted from these three types of images, and regression models were built to predict leaf chlorophyll content (measured by a handheld leaf chlorophyll meter) from the image features. ResultsModels that included two additional variables, DAS (day after sowing) and SLW (specific leaf weight), were also investigated to improve the prediction of chlorophyll. R2 for chlorophyll concentration for multiple linear models at various color components were 0.77 for R, 0.79 for G, 0.70 for B. To obtain additional spectral information, color component H, S, and I were calculated after color spaces being transformed. The result of HSI space showed that R2 for chlorophyll concentration for multiple linear models were 0.67 for H, 0.88 for S, 0.77 for I. The R2 values for different hyperspectral index like the ratio vegetation index (RVI), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index (MCARI) between 0.77 and 0.78. R2=0.79 was obtained with fluorescence image. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was employed to using the selected vegetation indices computed from different imaging data to estimate the chlorophyll concentration for sorghum plants. Among all the imaging data, chlorophyll content was predicted with high accuracy (R2 from 0.84 to 2.92, RPD from 2.49 to 3.58). ConclusionAccording to the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) error function, the model was better fitted based on images, DAS and SLW than that based on images and DAS. This study indicated that the accuracy for chlorophyll estimation was increased by the image traits combined with DAS and SLW. High throughput imaging provides a simple, rapid, and nondestructive method to estimate the leaf chlorophyll concentration.


MethodsX ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 101392
Author(s):  
Haydee E. Laza ◽  
Bo Zhao ◽  
Mary Hastert ◽  
Paxton Payton ◽  
Junping Chen

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 20624
Author(s):  
Youjun Zeng ◽  
Xueliang Wang ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
Ruibiao Miyan ◽  
Junle Qu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 2055-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Ying Joey Lee ◽  
James Alastair Miller ◽  
Sreetama Basu ◽  
Ting-Zhen Vanessa Kee ◽  
Lit-Hsin Loo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document