A Game Theory View of Preventive Defense Against Ballistic Missile Attack

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Julian Palmore, Françoise Melese
2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Palmore ◽  
Françoise Melese

Author(s):  
Charlie Hall

Abstract Britain was the first country to suffer casualties as the result of a ballistic missile attack, when German V-2 rockets began landing in London and the South-East in September 1944. This new menace posed critical challenges, not only to the civilians whose lives were endangered once again, but also to the British government. Policymakers had to decide what, if any, information they released to the public, amid fears of creating panic, providing free propaganda to the Nazis, and helping the V-2 launching units improve their aim. Their commitment to secrecy in this period was both resolute and largely unnecessary, not to mention ineffective. In the absence of official information released from above, the public drew their own conclusions and myriad rumours emerged, many of which were remarkably accurate. This article will explore the ways in which government policy surrounding censorship and publicity changed during the V-2 bombardment and the extent to which this affected those in the firing line. It will also add considerable nuance to our understanding of public morale in this period, which was rather less steadfast than many accounts suggest, and which continued to be a major government preoccupation, despite the diminishing likelihood of a descent into mass panic or defeatism.


2020 ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Bhupendra Jasani ◽  
Christopher Lee

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 306-311
Author(s):  
Jalal Delaram ◽  
Mahmoud Houshamnd ◽  
Farid Ashtiani ◽  
Omid Fatahi Valilai

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Sikka

In this paper, I use articulation theory to examine the political discourse which surrounds the Bush Administrations proposed ballistic missile defense shield. I argue that there are three central articulations used by the Bush Administration to garner public support for the ballistic missile defense shield. They are: 1) the articulation of missile defense with national security; 2) the unity formed out of terrorism and the threat of a missile attack by rogue states; and 3) the articulation of missile defense with technological inevitability and progress. I illustrate how these dominant articulations discursively serve to garner support for the proposed shield by setting the parameters around which discussions of missile defense can take place. My primary argument is that the discursive unities made by the Bush Administration out of such elements as terrorism, technology, progress, and capitalism functions to perpetuate and justify a larger American project of exceptionalism, unilateralism, and military hegemony.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document