The Impact of Group Diversity and Structure on Individual Negative Workplace Gossip

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-83
Author(s):  
Andrea Kim ◽  
Jiseon Shin ◽  
Youngsang Kim ◽  
Jinhee Moon
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pylin Chuapetcharasopon ◽  
Lukas Neville ◽  
Wendi L Adair ◽  
Susan E Brodt ◽  
Terri R Lituchy ◽  
...  

This article introduces the concept of cultural mosaic beliefs (CMBs) as a component of effective multicultural work groups. Building on theories of group diversity and self-verification, and responding to calls to understand moderators that explain the impact of group diversity on performance outcomes, we conceptualize CMBs as a psychological climate that individual group members perceive to promote the recognition, acceptance and expression, and utilization of cultural diversity (values, traditions, and practices) in their work. We also propose that CMBs might attenuate conflict that can sometimes characterize culturally diverse work groups distinguishing groups that falter from those that flourish and benefit from the informational and other potential advantages associated with their diverse cultural composition. In a series of five studies ( N = 1119), we develop a 17-item CMB scale comprised of three factors: perceived group diversity, cultural acceptance and expression, and culture utilization. We present evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, showing that the CMB scale is related to but distinct from other measures of diversity. We also demonstrate predictive validity, showing that the CMB scale is related to work group members’ identification with the group, commitment to the group, satisfaction with the group, and learning from the group. We conclude by proposing applications of our CMBs concept and measure to multicultural workplaces and offer future directions for research on cultural diversity, specifically the study of group CMBs as a moderator of cultural diversity’s effects on groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesa Schrand ◽  
Tobias Just

Purpose Successful developers need to manage a large number of cooperation partners and find innovative solutions for specific tasks, as each real estate project is somehow unique. Thus, the question arises as to whether intelligent group formation for real estate development calls for more or rather less diverse project groups. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to test the impact of group diversity on overall group performance with a unique data set. The authors collected the results of 150 project assignments from real estate executive education students at the IREBS Real Estate Academy from 2010 until 2016. Findings The authors find that group results were impacted positively for groups with disparity in work experience and ability. Differences in sex and age did not yield any measurable impact, neither positive nor negative. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that the relationship between work group diversity and group performance was tested for real estate educational projects. The authors believe that the results are highly relevant for all university work, for which teams have to cooperate on complex rather than basic assignments and problems. Moreover, they are the first to develop a framework that combines diversity theories with a clear distinction between three diversity concepts.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie J. Allen ◽  
David J. Stanley ◽  
Helen M. Williams ◽  
Sarah J. Ross

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kihyun Lee ◽  
Yeon Joo Chae

Purpose The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation on group performance has been considered ambiguous. The purpose of this paper is to resolve this ambiguity by theorizing and examining a curvilinear relationship between LMX differentiation and group performance, and the moderating effects of group diversity on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Data were drawn from 63 work groups (consisting of 322 members and 63 group leaders) selected from 27 technology service companies in South Korea. Group members rated their perceived LMX quality, while the human resource (HR) directors of each company assessed group performance. Findings The results showed that LMX differentiation had an inverted U-shaped relationship with group performance and that gender diversity and age diversity negatively moderated that relationship. However, the interaction between LMX differentiation and education-level diversity was not significant. Originality/value This study extends extant research by addressing the inconsistency among theoretical perspectives on the effects of LMX differentiation. This study transcends earlier research by considering the complex process of LMX differentiation, such as the curvilinear relationship between LMX differentiation and group performance, and the moderating effects of group diversity on that relationship.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Hansen ◽  
Hideo Owan ◽  
Jie Pan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document