A Qualitative Examination of the Self-Medicating Hypothesis Among Female Juvenile Offenders

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Smith
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christy A. Engle ◽  
Curtis W. Mcintyre ◽  
Addie Beth Denton ◽  
Christine P. Gancarz ◽  
Vanessa R. Cole ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Doreen Broadus ◽  
Monica K. Miller ◽  
Lacey Miller

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie R. Anderson ◽  
Brinn M. Walerych ◽  
Nordia A. Campbell ◽  
Ashlee R. Barnes ◽  
William S. Davidson ◽  
...  

The increasing proportion of girls in the juvenile justice system has prompted courts to develop gender-responsive services. The present study examined data from a mid-sized county juvenile court to examine the effects of a group home intervention for girls. The study compared group home participants ( n = 172) with girls who did not receive group home treatment ( n = 814) using propensity score matching (PSM). Girls who received group home treatment were significantly less likely to re-offend in the 2-year follow-up period. Policy and practice implications for gender-responsive services as well as future directions for research are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina A. Vitopoulos ◽  
Michele Peterson-Badali ◽  
Shelley Brown ◽  
Tracey A. Skilling

Author(s):  
Dorothy L. Espelage ◽  
Elizabeth Cauffman ◽  
Lisa Broidy ◽  
Alex R. Piquero ◽  
Paul Mazerolle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chiquitia Welch-Brewer

Understanding differences and similarities between male and female juvenile offenders is critically important for determining the treatment needs of each group. Less is known, however, about the similarities and differences among female juvenile offenders and the variation in their needs, risks, and psychosocial profiles. Understanding the variation among female juvenile offenders could lead to improvements in gender-responsive interventions and treatment. Latent profile analysis was conducted to construct risk-need profiles in a state-based sample of incarcerated girls ( N = 203) based on a range of psychosocial subscales covering family, peer, school and cognitive and emotional processes, psychopathology, and antisocial outcomes. Findings revealed four distinct groups/profiles with varying levels of risk-needs— Aggression Only (51%), Alcohol and Drug Use (19%), Socioemotional and Family Relationship Problems (24%), and Severe Alcohol and Drug Use (6%)—warranting the need for varying levels of treatment intensity and different treatment components across subgroups, ranging from less to more extensive.


2020 ◽  
pp. 096466392091596
Author(s):  
Peter Anton Zoettl

This article discusses the vertiginous proliferation of violence suffered and perpetrated by juveniles in the state of Bahia, north-eastern Brazil. Based on documentary and ethnographic evidence, it anatomizes the workings of law enforcement, juvenile justice and juvenile custody. It argues that the strategies of the police, the criminologies put into practice by the judiciary and the functioning of Youth Detention Centres collaborate to foster, rather than curb, youth offending and the violence committed by and against young citizens. Whereas prosecution and the dispensation of justice emphasize juvenile offenders’ responsibility for their ‘decision’ to become a ‘bandit’, juvenile custody, as a result of deep-rooted clientelist practices, is dominated by precarious conditions of incarceration which promote internal violence and the (self)ascription of a deviant juvenile identity. At the same time, the Othering of large sections of youth from the urban periphery has fuelled a vicious cycle of violence and counter-violence between members of drug factions and police forces, resulting in an increasing illegibility of the state at its margins.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby Spare Werner ◽  
Kathleen J. Hart ◽  
Susan L. Ficke

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti Chauhan ◽  
N. Dickon Reppucci ◽  
Mandi Burnette ◽  
Scott Reiner

2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi E Goldstein ◽  
David H Arnold ◽  
Jennifer Weil ◽  
Constance M Mesiarik ◽  
Dawn Peuschold ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document