Comparison of Endothelial Cell Loss and Surgically Induced Astigmatism following Conventional Extracapsular Cataract Surgery, Manual Small-Incision Surgery and Phacoemulsification

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie George ◽  
Pankaj Rupauliha ◽  
A. V. Sripriya ◽  
P. S. Rajesh ◽  
P. Vishnu Vahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Cell Loss ◽  
Endothelial Cell Loss ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Extracapsular Cataract Surgery ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Surgically Induced ◽  
Small Incision Surgery

scholarly journals Comparative study between conventional extra capsular cataract extraction versus manual small incision cataract surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gannaram Laxmiprasad ◽  
Chhaya Shori ◽  
Rakesh Shori ◽  
Ashalatha Alli
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Rehabilitation ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Surgically Induced

Background: Recent reports indicate that both manual small incision cataract surgery and extra capsular cataract excision surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation are safe and effective for treatment of cataract surgery, however, manual small incision cataract surgery gives better uncorrected vision. Objectives of the study were to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications, to compare induced astigmatism and to compare the visual rehabilitation.Methods: This is a prospective study of 100 consecutive patients assigned to undergo conventional extra capsular cataract excision surgery (50 cases) and manual small incision cataract surgery (50 cases). Study was done for a period of two years at a tertiary care referral hospital. Institutional Ethics Committee permission was taken. Also the informed consent was obtained from each patient.Results: In conventional ECCE, the most common surgically induced astigmatism was WTR in 73.4% of cases with mean of 2.79 D±1.3 on first day. 70% of cases with mean 2.1 D±1.28 and 64% of cases with mean of 1.86 D±1.14 at six weeks. ATR was common in MSICS group, 83.67% of cases with mean of 1.5 D±0.72 on first day, 86% of cases with mean of 1.03 D±0.6 at one week and 88% of cases with mean of 1.27 D±0.81 at six weeks. The induced astigmatism was less in MSICS group compared to ECCE group at first day but after six weeks there was no much significant difference found. Early visual recovery was better in MSICS groupConclusions: MSICS has definitive advantages over conventional ECCE in terms of early visual rehabilitation, minimal surgically induced astigmatism; no suture related complications and reduced surgical time.

scholarly journals Comparison of endothelial cell loss and complications between phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery (SICS) in uveitic cataract

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhargava ◽  
Shiv Kumar Sharma ◽  
Mini Chandra ◽  
Prachi Kumar ◽  
Yogesh Arora
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Cell Loss ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Endothelial Cell Loss ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Endothelial Cell Counts

Introduction: Endothelial cell loss and complications after cataract surgery may be higher when cataract is complicated by uveitis.Objective: To compare endothelial cell damage and complication rates after phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery (SICS) in patients with uveitis.Materials and methods: Patients with uveitic cataract were randomly allocated for phacoemulsification (n=75) or manual SICS (n=80) in a double blind prospective study. In the bag implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens was aimed in all cases. Patients with follow up of less than six months were excluded. Main outcome measures were alteration in endothelial cell counts (ECC) and morphology, improvement in vision and complication rates. ECC was measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 3 months and six months, postoperatively.Results: Six patients were lost to follow up and another three due inability to implant IOL. There were no significant difference in endothelial cell counts (P= 0.032), the variance of endothelial cell size (CV) and percentage of hexagonal cells between both the groups at six months (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.283). Endothelial cell density was significantly less in the group in which vitrectomy and/or pupil dilatation procedures were performed (2290±31.5 cells/mm2) versus (2385±50.3 cells/mm2), respectively (t test, P<0.001). Incidence of postoperative complications that were observed like persistent uveitis (P=0.591), macular edema (P=0.671) and PCO (P=0.678) and visual outcome (P=0.974) were comparable between the two groups.Conclusions: Manual SICS and phacoemulsification do not differ significantly in endothelial cell loss and complication rates in uveitic eyes. However, increased anterior chamber manoeuvring due to additional procedures may lead to significantly higher endothelial cell loss.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM IN SUPERIOR AND TEMPORAL SCLERAL INCISION IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Nitu Kumari ◽  
Kumari Preeti ◽  
Alka Jha ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Incision Size ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Surgically Induced

Aim: To evaluate the amount and type of surgically induced astigmatism in superior and temporal scleral incision in Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS). Material and Methods: A prospective randomized comparative study was carried out in Upgraded Department of Ophthalmology, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Bihar. Total 100 cases of senile or pre-senile cataract included in this study from July 2019 to December 2019. All the patients underwent MSICS under peribulbar anaesthesia. The patients with very hard cataract were excluded so as to keep the incision size uniformity (6- 6.5mm). 50 cases received superior scleral incision and 50 cases received temporal scleral incision. Post operative astigmatism was studied in both groups using Bausch & Lomb Keratometer on 1st day, 7th day, 6th week and 3rd month. Results: After 3 months of surgery, out of 50 patients in superior scleral incision group 74% patients had ATR astigmatism and 16% patients had WTR astigmatism whereas in temporal scleral incision group 56 % of the patients had WTR astigmatism and 36 % had ATR astigmatism. The mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) in temporal incision group was signicantly less than the superior incision group after 3 months postoperatively (t=2.33, p<0.05). Conclusion: This study reveals that temporal approach MSICS produces less postoperative astigmatism and has manifold advantages over superior incision MSICS with excellent visual outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document