The role of SHRM in turning tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge: a cross-national study of the UK and Malta

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 2299-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy W. Scully ◽  
Sandra C. Buttigieg ◽  
Alexis Fullard ◽  
Duncan Shaw ◽  
Mike Gregson
Keyword(s):  
Tacit Knowledge ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
National Study ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
Cross National

scholarly journals Picture-perfect lives on social media: a cross-national study on the role of media ideals in adolescent well-being

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orpha de Lenne ◽  
Laura Vandenbosch ◽  
Steven Eggermont ◽  
Kathrin Karsay ◽  
Jolien Trekels
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Well Being ◽  
National Study ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
Cross National

scholarly journals The Role of the Internet in Reconfiguring Marriages: A Cross-national Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (supp2) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Dutton ◽  
Ellen J. Helsper ◽  
Monica T. Whitty ◽  
Nai Li ◽  
J. Galen Buckwalter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Study ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
Cross National

scholarly journals Are evaluative cultures national or global? A cross-national study on evaluative cultures in academic recruitment processes in Europe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingvild Reymert ◽  
Jens Jungblut ◽  
Norway Siri B. Borlaug
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Recent Survey ◽  
National Study ◽  
Academic Fields ◽  
Evaluative Criteria ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
Cross National

AbstractStudies on academic recruitment processes have demonstrated that universities evaluate candidates for research positions using multiple criteria. However, most studies on preferences regarding evaluative criteria in recruitment processes focus on a single country, while cross-country studies are rare. Additionally, though studies have documented how fields evaluate candidates differently, those differences have not been deeply explored, thus creating a need for further inquiry. This paper aims to address this gap and investigates whether academics in two fields across five European countries prefer the same criteria to evaluate candidates for academic positions. The analysis is based on recent survey data drawn from academics in economics and physics in Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Our results show that the academic fields have different evaluative cultures and that researchers from different fields prefer specific criteria when assessing candidates. We also found that these field-specific preferences were to some extent mediated through national frameworks such as funding systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document