Loyalty program types as drivers of customer retention: a comparison of stand-alone programs and multi-vendor loyalty programs through the lens of transaction cost economics

Author(s):  
Mario Rese ◽  
Annika Hundertmark ◽  
Heiko Schimmelpfennig ◽  
Laura Marie Schons
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Zhenling Jiang ◽  
Yulia Nevskaya ◽  
Raphael Thomadsen

We show that a simple, nontiered loyalty program can substantially increase customer lifetime value and that most of this benefit comes from increasing customer retention.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Rik Paul ◽  
Debapratim Purkayastha

Title – Customer retention at Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Subject area – Marketing management, services marketing, customer relationship management and strategic marketing management. Study level/applicability – This case can be taught effectively to MBA/MS students. Case overview – Hyundai Motor India Ltd (HMIL) commenced operations in India in 1996 and launched its first car in India – the Hyundai Santro – in 1998. Since then, there has been no looking back for the company. Its domestic and export sales figures have risen manifold each year and the car maker has gone on to become the second largest manufacturer in the Indian car market with a market share of 18.10 percent as of 2010-2011. By 2009-2010, most of the major international car makers were setting up production facilities in India. The market was set to become highly competitive and it became imperative for manufacturers like Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL) and HMIL to retain their customers in order to maintain their market share. Nalin Kapoor, General Manager (Sales & Marketing) was contemplating the marketing strategies he could use to counter the stiff competition. Customer retention was one of the major problems in the automobile industry as the purchase time span varied between three and five years and the cost of brand switching was nil. HMIL had been pursuing customer relationship management activities but its customer retention ratio was declining. Kapoor and his team decided to study the loyalty programs of some companies in the automobile industry to ascertain whether launching a loyalty card could solve their problem of retention. The marketing strategy department with the help of a management intern extensively studied the existing loyalty program of Hero Honda, MSIL, and Ford to identify how those programs were designed and promoted to the customer. The reports also indicated the shortcomings of each program and the features which were highly accepted by the customer. The loyalty program also had cost implications as there was a need for a strong technical support team to run it successfully. With the reports in hand, Kapoor was in a dilemma on whether launching a loyalty card would be feasible or not. If yes, then how should it be structured to motivate the customers to stay loyal to the company? Also, how could the cost in terms of promotion, training, and technical support be justified? If not a loyalty program, then what marketing strategies should the company pursue to retain customers effectively? The problem demanded immediate attention and action and Kapoor was well aware of the implications that a delay in decision making would have for the market share of the company in the growing and dynamic automobile industry in India. Expected learning outcomes – These include: the concept of customer relationship management; relationship marketing; customer retention; customer loyalty; customer profitability segments; relationship bonds; and designing loyalty programs. Supplementary materials – Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email: [email protected] to request teaching notes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-655
Author(s):  
Dimas Hendrawan ◽  
◽  
Rila Anggraeni ◽  

Retailers must find specific ways to be able to continue to maintain their business with changes in consumer behavior. Some retailers use a loyalty program as their marketing strategy that provides certain additional benefits for frequent consumers. The objective of this work is to verify the effect of the loyalty program and loyalty program satisfaction on store loyalty. The data was collected through questionnaires from 150 respondents. The results reflected that loyalty programs significantly influence loyalty program satisfaction. Loyalty program satisfaction significantly influences store loyalty. The loyalty program is not directly related to storing loyalty. Loyalty program satisfaction mediates the effect of a loyalty program on store loyalty. The study highlights the importance of loyalty program satisfaction in the connection of loyalty program and store loyalty. To gain a loyal consumer, the retailer should improve the exclusivity and the attractiveness of the program. A useful and valuable reward will improve customer retention.


2020 ◽  
pp. 51-81
Author(s):  
D. P. Frolov

The transaction cost economics has accumulated a mass of dogmatic concepts and assertions that have acquired high stability under the influence of path dependence. These include the dogma about transaction costs as frictions, the dogma about the unproductiveness of transactions as a generator of losses, “Stigler—Coase” theorem and the logic of transaction cost minimization, and also the dogma about the priority of institutions providing low-cost transactions. The listed dogmas underlie the prevailing tradition of transactional analysis the frictional paradigm — which, in turn, is the foundation of neo-institutional theory. Therefore, the community of new institutionalists implicitly blocks attempts of a serious revision of this dogmatics. The purpose of the article is to substantiate a post-institutional (alternative to the dominant neo-institutional discourse) value-oriented perspective for the development of transactional studies based on rethinking and combining forgotten theoretical alternatives. Those are Commons’s theory of transactions, Wallis—North’s theory of transaction sector, theory of transaction benefits (T. Sandler, N. Komesar, T. Eggertsson) and Zajac—Olsen’s theory of transaction value. The article provides arguments and examples in favor of broader explanatory possibilities of value-oriented transactional analysis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 158 (12) ◽  
pp. 406-416
Author(s):  
Jon Bingen Sande

The forest industry is riddled with exchange relationships. The parties to exchanges may have diverging goals and interests, but still depend upon each other due to non-redeployable specific assets. Formal and relational contracts may be used to deal with the resulting cooperation problems. This paper proposes a framework based on transaction cost economics and relational exchange theory, and examines to what extent empirical research has found formal and relational contracts to deal with three different governance problems. To that end, I review the results from 32 studies in a range of settings. These studies generally support the view that exchanges characterized by high degrees of specific assets should be supported by formal and relational contracts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document