Validation of Turkish version of the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale

Author(s):  
Nurten Gizem Tore ◽  
Deran Oskay ◽  
Aslıhan Avanoglu Guler ◽  
Abdurrahman Tufan
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1235-1235
Author(s):  
N. G. Tore ◽  
D. Oskay ◽  
A. Avanoglu Guler ◽  
A. Tufan

Background:The Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional (CSF-17) Scale is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).Objectives:The aim of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CSF-17 into the Turkish language and investigate its convergent validity and reliability in Turkish-speaking patients with SSc.Methods:The CSF-17 was cross-culturally adapted according to Beaton’s guideline. Participants completed CSF-17 Scale, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined interpreting Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values, respectively. Convergent validity was tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.Results:Fifty-six patients with SSc were enrolled in the study. Cronbach’s alpha and ICC values of the CSF-17 total score were found to be as 0.963 and 0.958, respectively, indicating excellent reliability. As for the convergent validity, it was determined that CSF-17 total score has a good correlation with SHAQ. Correlations of subscales of CSF-17 with subscales of SF-12 and HADS ranged from poor to moderate (Table 1).Conclusion:Tukish version of CSF-17 met the set criteria of reliability and convergent validity. According to the results of the analysis, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the CSF-17 is a reliable and valid tool for Turkish-speaking SSc patients.References:[1]Daste C, Abdoul H, Foissac F et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale. British Journal of Dermatology 2020; 183:710-718.[2]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24):3186-3191.[3]Karadag DT, Karakas F, Tekeoglu S et al. Validation of Turkish version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire. Clin Rheumatol, 2019,38(7):1917-1923.[4]Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care, 1996,34:220-233.[5]Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983,67:361-370.[6]Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007,60:34–42.Table 1.Convergent validity of the CSF-17ScalesCSF-17Section ASection BTotalSHAQ0.680**0.640**0.702**HADS-A0.405*0.472**HADS-D0.460**0.605**SF-12 MCS-0.482**-0.491**SF-12 PCS-0.745**-0.700**CSF-17: Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale, SHAQ: Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, HADS-A: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety, HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, SF 12 MCS: Short Form-12 Mental Component Score, SF-12 PSC: Short Form-12 Physical Component Score.*p<0.05, **p<0.001Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-576
Author(s):  
Gokhan Maras ◽  
Shahed Sheidayi ◽  
Gokhan Yazici ◽  
Melek Volkan Yazici ◽  
Gurkan Gunaydin ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne H. Lease ◽  
Ayse Uruk ◽  
Guler Boyraz ◽  
Brett A. Stancil ◽  
Elin Overbo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samet Kose ◽  
Feryal Cam Celikel ◽  
Filiz Kulacaoglu ◽  
Ercan Akin ◽  
Mehmet Yalcin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Aydemir ◽  
Siğnem Öztekin ◽  
Fatma Akdeniz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document