Enhancing School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Tier 1 core practices to improve disciplinary equity

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Eoin Bastable ◽  
Sarah Fairbanks Falcon ◽  
Rhonda Nese ◽  
Paul Meng ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Core Practices

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

scholarly journals Involvement and Participation of Students With Severe Disabilities in SWPBIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Kurth ◽  
Alison L. Zagona
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Educators ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tiered System ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities

With more schools implementing Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) and achieving valued student outcomes associated with these efforts, the inclusion of students with extensive and pervasive support needs (i.e., “severe” disabilities) in this tiered system must be considered. These students remain programmatically and physically separated from general education instruction and activities. Given that SWPBIS is implemented in general education settings and it is designed to support all students, the purpose of this study was to investigate SWPBIS coaches’ perceptions of the involvement of students with extensive support needs in SWPBIS processes and procedures within one state. Findings suggest the coaches believe that students with extensive support needs are physically and programmatically separated from Tier 1 SWPBIS instruction and activities, with few general educators expressing participation in facilitating their involvement. Implications and recommendations for these findings are provided.

An Exploration of the Relationship between PBIS and Discipline Outcomes for Students With Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 074193252110634
Author(s):  
Brandi Simonsen ◽  
Jennifer Freeman ◽  
Anthony J. Gambino ◽  
Sandra Sears ◽  
Katherine Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
National Study ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Rigorous Research ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
The Relationship

To support all students, including students with disabilities, many schools have adopted a positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) framework. Although rigorous research documents the beneficial effects of Tier 1 PBIS for all students and emerging research extends these findings to students with disabilities, there has not been a national study focused on PBIS and discipline outcomes for students with disabilities. In this exploratory study, we combine existing national data sets to explore the relationship between (a) known PBIS exposure (i.e., being in the PBIS data set) and fidelity (i.e., meeting the criterion on an established fidelity measure of Tier 1 PBIS) and (b) exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities. Using two-part path analysis, we document that PBIS may be associated with decreased use of suspension; however, findings are less consistent for other discipline outcomes. This study highlights the critical need for more accurate data on discipline outcomes and further research on effective intervention.

Promoting the Accessibility of SWPBIS for Students With Severe Disabilities

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon L. Loman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Virginia L. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Universal Design For Learning ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Design For Learning ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities

This study heeds a decade-long call to action to examine the accessibility of Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) for students with severe disabilities. To improve the accessibility of SWPBIS, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and evidence-based practices were used to teach three students with severe disabilities schoolwide behavior expectations in inclusive schoolwide settings. Special education teachers from three different elementary schools adapted their campus SWPBIS Tier 1 lesson plans with additional visual supports, social narratives, and systematic instructional procedures. All participants showed improvement as evidenced by a reduction in the duration of their problem behavior in schoolwide settings. Implementing teachers found the intervention and corresponding materials to be socially valid.

Effects of Coaching on Teachers’ Implementation of Tier 1 School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Strategies

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keri S. Bethune
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Personnel ◽  
Group Instruction ◽  
Education Students ◽  
General Education Students ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Support Strategies ◽  
Tier 1

Fidelity of implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) procedures within schools is critical to the success of the program. Coaching has been suggested as one approach to helping ensure accuracy of implementation of SWPBIS plans. This study used a multiple baseline across participants design to examine the effects of coaching on elementary schools teachers’ implementation of Tier 1 SWPBIS with their general education students. After providing the coach with an initial training on the SWPBIS and coaching procedures, four elementary schoolteachers were provided with side-by-side coaching during whole-class group instruction. Results indicated that there was a functional relationship between coaching and improved SWPBIS fidelity scores. Implications for practice included the need to consider selecting an appropriate person to act as the coach, scheduling difficulties, and the inability to standardize the number of opportunities for teachers to demonstrate some of the skills based on variability in student performance. However, utilizing school personnel to act as SWPBIS coaches may be a viable option to build sustainability and integrity of SWPBIS procedures within schools.

A Systematic Review of Tier 1 PBIS Implementation in Alternative Education Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 019874292091564
Author(s):  
Nicolette M. Grasley-Boy ◽  
Brian Reichow ◽  
Wilhelmina van Dijk ◽  
Nicholas Gage
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Education ◽  
Academic Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Outcomes ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Behavioral Measures ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
The World ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a multitiered system of support for behavior used in many schools across the world. Researchers have begun adapting and evaluating Tier 1 of PBIS for students placed in alternative education (AE) settings. The purpose of this review is to synthesize these evaluations. We systematically searched two electronic databases to find potential studies of Tier 1 PBIS in AE settings. We screened 47 full texts, 19 of which met all inclusion criteria. Most studies (16 of 19, 84%) evaluated student behavioral outcomes, while seven studies (37%) evaluated academic outcomes alone or in addition to behavioral measures. Overall, restraints and seclusions generally decreased following Tier 1 implementation, but behavioral incident changes were variable and academic outcomes only improved for students enrolled continuously throughout the studies. The findings of this review support the need for continued evaluations of Tier 1 in AE settings using more rigorous methodologies and metrics that account for rolling admissions. The observed reductions in restraints and seclusions are promising for students and practitioners given the poor outcomes associated with these consequences.

Strategies for Including Students With Extensive Support Needs in SWPBIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 273247452110003
Author(s):  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Sheldon L. Loman
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Needs ◽  
Tier 1

Schools that implement School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) offer a multitiered continuum of supports that increases in intensity to support the behavioral needs of all students within a school. Although the number of schools that have adopted SWPBIS continues to rise, students with extensive support needs (ESN) may be excluded from various aspects of SWPBIS at the Tier 1 and Tier 2 levels. Given that SWPBIS is intended to be fully inclusive, the purpose of this article is to provide educators and other staff with practical tools and guidelines for including students with ESN in Tiers 1 and 2 of SWPBIS. We also present additional considerations for self-assessment, collaborative teaming, and professional development for including students with ESN in SWPBIS.

Multitiered Systems of Supports, Response to Intervention, and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Samantha Bates ◽  
LaShonda Linnen ◽  
Stephanie Columbia ◽  
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Students At Risk ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

This chapter covers the Response to Intervention framework, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, and multitiered systems of supports (MTSS). The Response to Intervention framework is a central step in implementing a successful MTSS framework. MTSS delivers school-based supports across three tiers: tier 1 (universal), tier 2 (targeted), and tier 3 (individualized). The MTSS framework is a resource that enables schools to use data not only to identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes but also to monitor student progress and deliver evidence-based interventions. The chapter provides examples of ways social workers can maximize the utility of these models and school teams to improve student outcomes.

A Survey of Team Members’ Perceptions of Coaching Activities Related to Tier 1 SWPBIS Implementation

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Bastable ◽  
Michelle M. Massar ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Action Planning ◽  
Fidelity Of Implementation ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Perceived Importance ◽  
Partial Correlations ◽  
Coaching Activities

Coaching is an important component in multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) such as school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS), but little is known about which coaching activities are most related to sustained implementation of this school-wide framework. A survey was developed to examine the amount of receipt and perceived importance of coaching activities delivered to SWPBIS school teams. Respondents included SWPBIS team members ( n = 264) implementing Tier 1 SWPBIS for at least 3 years in 138 districts across nine states. Partial correlations were conducted on a subsample of schools ( n = 131) using the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) to assess self-reported implementation fidelity to examine the extent to which each coaching activity was associated with fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS. Results indicated Assisting With Team Action Planning, Assisting With Data Collection, and Sharing Knowledge of SWPBIS Systems were perceived as most important to SWPBIS sustainability. Partial correlations showed two activities were statistically significant and positively correlated with SWPBIS fidelity of implementation: Running Data Reports for the Team and Modeling SWPBIS Implementation. Implications for assessing and differentiating coaching supports delivered to schools are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document