Perspectival realism and social constructivism: Commentary on Irwin Hoffman's “discussion: Toward a social‐constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation”∗1

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Orange
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ehrhardt

Renowned Soviet psychologist and father of social constructivist learning theory Lev Vygotsky (1978) stated: “Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later, on the individual level” (p. 57). In online practice, social constructivism involves students learning from and with each other in computer-mediated collaborative learning communities. In order for students and faculty to succeed in the online social constructivist environment these efforts demand institutional support. This chapter will introduce issues facing students and faculty that relate to the implementation of online social constructivism. Recommendations focusing on online student support and professional development will be offered as well as a discussion of future trends pointing toward a digital divide between the students of institutions who do support these practices and students of institutions in which faculty have to make do.


Author(s):  
Janet Salmons

Social constructivism is an established educational theory based on the principle that learners and teachers co-construct knowledge through social processes. This chapter proposes an updated theory, e-social constructivism, that takes into account the milieu of electronic communications in which e-learning occurs. Thinkers such as Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner, who laid the theoretical foundations of social constructivism, wrote in a time when face-to-face interactions were the basis for instruction. The works of these writers are reviewed in this chapter. Together with the results of the author’s phenomenological study of collaborative e-learning, they form the basis of e-social constructivist theory. The author uses grounded theory and situational analysis to derive and support e-social constructivist theory. This chapter discusses the implication of that theory for research, teaching and instructional design.


Author(s):  
Christopher Ewart Dann ◽  
Shirley O'Neill

The idea of feedback in education is accepted as vital in students' learning experience as a key to their success. Moreover, there is a growing recognition that for formative assessment practices to be most effective; data produced should be of a type that can help students improve their learning, and so should be dialogic, and feed forward rather than back. That is, students should have the opportunity to be engaged in critical reflection and dialogue about their performance in relation to such data. This chapter, therefore, presents a framework that positions dialogue at the core of formative assessment practices. It aligns this with Boud and Molloy's “Feedback Mark 2” model and Henderson et al.'s 12 conditions of success within the broader field of formative assessment to present a case for a more fine-grained examination of the concepts involved and the need for a change in mindset. The chapter argues that dialogue is the conduit through which nuanced moments and “feed markers” provide indicators of learning progression, and that how this impacts on the design of formative assessment tasks requires greater scrutiny. It concludes that the nuanced humanistic behaviors of the dialogic experience need further definition and exploration within the feedback space, and that the established narrative around the use of “feedback” needs to change to accommodate the social constructivist view of learning if practices are to be enhanced.


2013 ◽  
pp. 1335-1349
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ehrhardt

Renowned Soviet psychologist and father of social constructivist learning theory Lev Vygotsky (1978) stated: “Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later, on the individual level” (p. 57). In online practice, social constructivism involves students learning from and with each other in computer-mediated collaborative learning communities. In order for students and faculty to succeed in the online social constructivist environment these efforts demand institutional support. This chapter will introduce issues facing students and faculty that relate to the implementation of online social constructivism. Recommendations focusing on online student support and professional development will be offered as well as a discussion of future trends pointing toward a digital divide between the students of institutions who do support these practices and students of institutions in which faculty have to make do.


2020 ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Charlotte Witt

What is gender? This chapter addresses this question by drawing on literary and imaginative resources rather than philosophical argument or dictionary definitions. To illuminate gender in the present, the author uses the parable of Height Society where Talls and Shorts stand in for the gender binary. The author also borrows from The Left Hand of Darkness by renowned science fiction writer Ursula LeGuin to spark thinking about future possibilities of gender beyond the binary. Throughout, the author discusses the history of gender binary language and proposes a social constructivist view of gender. Differences between gender and sex are explained, and the author explains the importance of intersexual approaches to the topic of gender as well.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-151
Author(s):  
Markus Dressler

AbstractThis paper takes the social constructivist approach, formulated by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, as a starting point for an investigation into epistemology and theorizing in the contemporary study of religion. It discusses various strands of scholarship in dialogue with social constructivism and questions in particular the reductionism of radical constructivist positions. Exploring the boundaries of the classical social constructivist paradigm, the article argues that students of religion should consider the implication of social, historical, embodied and material structures in the production of knowledge about religion. For that purpose, it draws on various soft realist approaches to stress the importance of remaining attentive to positionality (reflecting on the sites from where we theorize) and contextuality (reflecting on the inter-relation of discourse and materiality) in theorizing “religion”. Finally, the article suggests that soft realist positions can be integrated in a slightly broadened social constructivist framework for the study of religion.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
May Cheng May Hung ◽  
Winnie So Wing Mui ◽  
Wong Yu Lai Wah ◽  
Lee Man Yuk Ching

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document