Team Diversity and Team Success in Collaborative Crowdsourcing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Rong Wang
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 911-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Mayo ◽  
Maria Kakarika ◽  
Charalampos Mainemelis ◽  
Nicolas Till Deuschel

In the last 22 years, research on diversity in teams has been propelled by information processing and social categorization theories, and more recently, by theories of disparity/(in)justice and access to external networks. These theories stress different diversity processes, treating team diversity respectively as variety of information, as separation, as disparity, and as variety of access. We appraise this literature by identifying major problems in the way these four foundational theories are used either alone or in combination, arguing that the related theoretical models are inherently incomplete and static. In an attempt to resolve these problems, we introduce a metatheoretical framework that relates these four foundational theories according to the metadimensions of group boundary and diversity mindset. We also propose a metatheoretical model that identifies interactions among the four diversity processes and specifies diversity response patterns to team success or failure over time. Our metatheoretical approach resolves significant omissions in the literature and penetrates into the dynamic nature of team diversity in more complex, temporally sensitive and synthetic ways.


2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-94
Author(s):  
Eric Kearney

Zusammenfassung: Im Kontext von Fußballteams im Amateurbereich untersucht die vorliegende Arbeit den Einfluss von “Diversity” bezüglich Nationalität auf das Ausmaß an sozialer Integration und emotionalen Konflikten. Eine querschnittliche Studie an 42 Teams zeigt, dass die Teamzusammengehörigkeitsdauer den Zusammenhang zwischen “Diversity” bezüglich Nationalität und sozialer Integration moderiert: Bei geringer Teamzugehörigkeitsdauer war dieser Zusammenhang negativ, bei langer Teamzugehörigkeitsdauer dagegen nicht mehr signifikant. Eine analoge Hypothese hinsichtlich des Ausmaßes an emotionalen Konflikten bestätigte sich nicht. Die Ergebnisse werden dahingehend interpretiert, dass der negative Einfluss von demographischer Team-“Diversity” auf die soziale Integration unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen im Laufe der Zeit abnimmt.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (12) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Frederic Lohr
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Serghei Musaji ◽  
Julio De Castro

Despite the continuous interest in studying entrepreneurial teams, the relationship between team composition and, particularly, team diversity and performance remains fertile ground for active debate. Taking roots in the knowledge-based view and organizational learning literatures, this chapter argues that performance in entrepreneurial teams is contingent on (a) the overlap between team members’ knowledge/competences and the content of the performed tasks, (b) the duplication of the team members’ knowledge in the areas with that content, (c) the nature of tasks (exploration or exploitation), (d) the team’s flexibility to adapt to changes in the content and nature of those tasks, and (e) the rate of environmental change. Because an important source of ambiguity in the understanding of how team diversity and performance are linked ties to issues of how team diversity is conceptualized and operationalized, the chapter also proposes a new way of looking at diversity in future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy V. Mumford ◽  
M. Travis Maynard

Abstract Research on teams in organizations tends to focus on understanding the causes of team performance with a focus on how to enjoy the benefits of team success and avoid the negative consequences of team failure. This paper instead asks the question, ‘what are some of the negative consequences of team success?’ A review of the literature on teams is augmented with research from cognitive science, sociology, occupational psychology, and psychology to explore the potential negative long-term consequences of teamwork success. The general topics of groupthink, overconfidence bias, regression to the mean, role overload, and strategy calcification are reviewed while discussing the implications for future research streams and practical team management.


2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Fortunato
Keyword(s):  

The 2002 season represented the fourth consecutive year in which ABC’s NFL Monday Night Football ratings have declined. The difficulty of predicting which teams will be good has made it challenging to put together a schedule of compelling games that will attract an audience. If team success is not a certain predictor, perhaps the behavior of the sports audience can be used as a more efficient variable in the scheduling of games. This study examined the overall national rating of the teams and the TV ratings in each NFL city for the 17 Monday Night Football games in 2002. The findings, as expected, demonstrated that more people of a particular city watched Monday Night Football when the team from that city was playing as compared with when they were not. It was also found, interestingly, that games in which a rival of the home team was playing also drew an audience from the home city.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-387
Author(s):  
Trey Dronyk-Trosper ◽  
Brandli Stitzel

How important is recruiting to a football program’s success? While prior research has attempted to answer this question, we utilize an extensive panel set covering 13 years of games along with a two-stage least squares approach to investigate the effects of recruiting on team success. This article also includes new control variables to account for omitted variable bias that prior work may have missed. We also split our sample to investigate whether recruiting displays heterogeneous effects across schools. Additionally, we find evidence that the benefits of recruiting are driven by team-specific effects, indicating that team success may be more heavily derived from the ability of teams to harness and improve their recruits than their ability to utilize each athlete’s raw abilities. This leads to important revelations regarding future research into both the value of recruits and what drives a football team’s success.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document