scholarly journals A reliability and validity study of the electronic health literacy scale among stroke patients in China

Author(s):  
Yu He ◽  
Lina Guo ◽  
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski ◽  
Miao Wei ◽  
Gege Zhang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu He ◽  
Lina Guo ◽  
Yanjin Liu ◽  
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski ◽  
Miao Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: This study was designed to attain Chinesization of the electronic Health Literacy Scale and to examine the reliability and validity for evaluating compliance and effectiveness of electronic health literacy among stroke patients in China.Design: This is a cross-sectional design.Methods: A demographic questionnaire, the electronic Health Literacy Scale(e-HLS)and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) were administered to a sample of 648 patients with ischemic stroke recruited from November to December 2020 in a tertiary hospital.Results: The Cronbach’α coefficient on the e-HLS-CHI was 0.907. Kappa consistency coefficient of test-retest reliability was 0.691(p<0.05). The Content Validity Index (CVI) indicated that the content of this scale was considered to be meaningful. Three factors were extracted by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), accounting for 90.84% of the total variance. The factors loading on 19 items ranged from 0.806 to 0.944. Confirmatory Factory Analysis (CFA) revealed that three factors of e-HLS-CHI fit well ( NFI = 0.979, RFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.972, CFI=0.987, RMSEA = 0.070, CMIN/DF= 2.586). Good simultaneous validity was suggested by the positive correlation of 0.94 (p<0.001) between the e-HLS-CHI and eHEALS. When using eHEALS as the standard, the area under the ROC curve of e-HLS-CHI was 0.896 (95% CI: 0.831-0.960, p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% and 70.4% respectively, indicating that it has good predictive validity.Conclusions: The e-HLS can be used to evaluate electronic health literacy of stroke patients in China after translation and debugging.Impact: This study proves that e-HLS can be used in strokep atients in China. And it can be considered for the investigation of other types of patients and provide new ideas for disease prevention.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Kwon-Hee Park ◽  
Hee-Won Lee ◽  
Kee-Boem Park ◽  
Jin-Youn Lee ◽  
Ah-Ra Cho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu He ◽  
Lina Guo ◽  
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski ◽  
Yanjin Liu ◽  
Miao Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: It is of great significance for brain and heart health managers to assess the electronic health literacy of people at high risk of stroke for improving the current situation of stroke in China. Although various measuring instruments have been developed, there is still a lack of suitable tools to match the development of network.Aim: To examine the reliability and validity of the electronic Health Literacy Scale(e-HLS)among people at high risk of stroke in China, so as to provide appropriate measurement tools for brain heart health managers.Methods: A demographic questionnaire, the electronic Health Literacy Scale(e-HLS)and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) were administered to a sample of 648 people at high risk of stroke recruited from November to December 2020 in a tertiary hospital.Results: The Cronbach’α coefficient on the e-HLS-CHI was 0.91. Three factors were extracted by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), accounting for 90.84% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factory Analysis (CFA) revealed that three factors of e-HLS-CHI fit well ( NFI = 0.979, RFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.972, CFI=0.987, RMSEA = 0.070, CMIN/DF= 2.586). Good simultaneous validity was suggested by the positive correlation of 0.94 between the e-HLS-CHI and eHEALS. And when using eHEALS as the standard, the area under the ROC curve of e-HLS-CHI was 0.896 (95% CI: 0.831-0.960, P = 0.000). After calculation, the sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% and 70.4% respectively, indicating that it has nice predictive validity.Conclusions: The e-HLS can be used to evaluate electronic health literacy of people at high risk of stroke in China. This may be helpful for brain and heart health managers to assess the current situation of electronic health literacy in people at high risk of stroke and provide reference for future health promotion programs.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Areti Efthymiou ◽  
Nicos Middleton ◽  
Andreas Charalambous ◽  
Evridiki Papastavrou

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Yeşim Aksoy Derya ◽  
Aslı Sis Çelik ◽  
Serap Ejder Apay

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Cecilia Estrada-Barranco ◽  
Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda ◽  
Vanesa Abuín-Porras ◽  
Francisco Molina-Rueda

(1) Background: Observational scales are the most common methodology used to assess postural control and balance in people with stroke. The aim of this paper was to analyse the construct validity of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) scale in post-stroke patients in the acute, subacute, and chronic stroke phases. (2) Methods: Sixty-one post-stroke participants were enrolled. To analyze the construct validity of the PASS, the following scales were used: the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). (3) Results: The construct validity of the PASS scale in patients with stroke at acute phase was moderate with the FAC (r = −0.791), WGS (r = −0.646) and FIM (r = −0.678) and excellent with the BI (r = 0.801). At subacute stage, the construct validity of the PASS scale was excellent with the FAC (r = 0.897), WGS (r = −0.847), FIM (r = −0.810) and BI (r = −0.888). At 6 and 12 months, the construct validity of the PASS with the FAC, WGS, FIM and BI was also excellent. (4) Conclusions: The PASS scale is a valid instrument to assess balance in post-stroke individuals especially, in the subacute and chronic phases (at 6 and 12 months).


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülbahar Korkmaz Aslan ◽  
Asiye Kartal ◽  
Türkan Turan ◽  
Gülay Taşdemir Yiğitoğlu ◽  
Cansel Kocakabak

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Miao Li ◽  
Jiaxin Gu ◽  
Xintong Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To examine the validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) among stroke patients. Background Stroke patients need long-term management of symptoms and life situation, and treatment burden has recently emerged as a new concept that can influence the health outcomes during the rehabilitation process. Methods The convenience sampling method was used to recruit 187 cases of stroke patients in a tertiary grade hospital in Tianjin for a formal investigation. Item analysis, reliability and validity tests were carried out. The reliability test included internal consistency and test–retest reliability. And as well as content, structure and convergent validity were performed for the validity test. Results Of the 187 completed questionnaires, only 180 (96.3%) were suitable for analysis. According to the experts’ evaluation, the I-CVI of each item was from 0.833 to 1.000, and the S-CVI was 0.967. The exploratory factor analysis yielded three-factor components with a cumulative variation of 53.054%. Convergent validity was demonstrated using measures of Morisky’s Medication Adherence Scale 8 (r = –0.450, P &lt; 0.01). All correlations between items and global scores ranged from 0.403 to 0.638. Internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach’s α of 0.824 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.846, respectively. Conclusions The Mandarin TBQ had acceptable validity and reliability. The use of TBQ in the assessment of treatment burden of stroke survivor may benefit health resources allocation and provide tailor therapeutic interventions to construct minimally disruptive care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document