scholarly journals A dyadic exploration of support in everyday life of persons with RA and their significant others

Author(s):  
Maria Bergström ◽  
Åsa Larsson Ranada ◽  
Annette Sverker ◽  
Ingrid Thyberg ◽  
Mathilda Björk
Aphasiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Monica Blom Johansson ◽  
Marianne Carlsson ◽  
Per Östberg ◽  
Karin Sonnander

IKON ◽  
2009 ◽  
pp. 109-147
Author(s):  
Carlo Cristini ◽  
Giovanni Cesa-Bianchi

- This article is aimed to analyse immigrants' sociability and the social dimension of their cultural consumption, assuming that consumption itself is a social action embedded in subject's social and cultural sphere and that cultural object, at their time, are a fundamental resource for social and everyday life. The attention will be focused, in particular, on subject's "significant others" and their role in shaping and mediating subject's consumption and social life. Then the article will deepen the relationship between consumption and subject's cultural capital.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 202.2-203
Author(s):  
M. Bergström ◽  
Å. Larsson Ranada ◽  
A. Sverker ◽  
I. Thyberg ◽  
M. Bjork

Background:Participation in everyday life and the relationships between persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their significant others are often affected by the disease. Usually, both parts need to adapt to new roles [1]. However, the dyadic interaction between them in everyday life is yet to be understood on a deeper level.Objectives:To exploreI) How dyads consisting of persons with RA and their significant others comprehend support and participation in everyday life, andII) how the dyadic interaction can influence their experience of participation in everyday life.Methods:In-depth individual interviews were conducted both with the persons with RA 12-13 years after diagnosis and inclusion in the Swedish multicenter project TIRA-2 [2], and with their significant others as defined by the persons with RA. Demographic data and the Valued Life Activity Scale (VLA-swe) [3] was reported by the persons with RA. To avoid bias, the persons with RA and their significant others were interviewed by different researches. Data from the interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis with a dyadic approach was undertaken [4]. The process of coding and categorizing was discussed between the researchers. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee at Linköping University (Dnr. 2018/158-31), all participants gave their written consent.Results:Three women and two men with RA and five significant others, all represented by spouses, participated (N=10). The age of the persons with RA ranged from 34 to 67 years and a majority experienced difficulties in ≥ 12 valued life activities.Three categories were revealed:1) A strong willpower affecting the dyadic relationship, meaning that the understanding within the dyads was that the persons with RA were not so keen to share status, which was mentioned in connection to tenacity and expectations.2) Being a support to each other, referring to the mutual understanding within the couples that there was a constant exchange of support, forming a basis for participation in everyday life. However, disagreement was expressed concerning an unequal amount of support.3) The dyads’ potential issues with awareness, addressing the difficulty in fully comprehending the impact of the diagnosis. The couples mentioned an unwillingness from the person with RA to share information, and the significant other viewing comments as complaining. This type of miscommunication was interpreted as a potential negative effect on participation in everyday life.Conclusion:A constant exchange of support within the dyads was evident. However, the dyadic relationships were often affected by the willpower of the persons with RA to be independent in everyday life. In addition, the dyads faced the concern of fully understanding the diagnosis. The results indicate further needs for interventions for both the persons with RA as well as the significant others, in order to boost the dyadic interaction, and thereby facilitate optimal participation in everyday life of persons with RA.References:[1]Brignon M, Vioulac C, Boujut E et al. (2019) Patients and relatives coping with inflammatory arthritis: care teamwork. Health Expect 2019;00:1-11[2]Thyberg I, Dahlström Ö, Björk M, et al. (2017) Hand pains in women and men in early rheumatoid arthritis, a one year follow-up after diagnosis. The Swedish TIRA project. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39(3):291-300[3]Björk M, Thyberg M, Valtersson, E et al. (2016) Validation and internal consistency of the Swedish version of the Valued Life Activities scale. Clin Rehabil 2016;30(12):1211-1219[4]Eiskovits Z, Koren C (2010) Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qual Health Res 2010;20(12):1642-55Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Georgi M. Sarov

Summary It is well known that some psychological features of adolescents are positively associated with alcohol drinking but less attention is paid to the psychological features of their significant others. The aim of the study was to describe a common psychological profile of significant others to regularly alcohol drinking adolescents. A survey was conducted using an original questionnaire, which classifying alcohol drinking as regular, social (incidental) and abstinence. Of 903 students (aged 15-19), 169 identified themselves as regular drinkers (RDA) and 279 - as abstainers (NDA). The significant others of these two groups were compared statistically in terms of a wide range of psychological features. It was found that RDAs were significantly more likely to have: fathers (OR=1.94; 95% Cl 1.04-3.62) and friends (OR=l .55; 95% Cl 1.02-2.36) that tended to avoid obligations in favor of pleasure; extravert friends (OR=1.55; 95% Cl 1.06-2.28) and lovers (OR=1.72; 95% Cl 1.14-2.59); impulsive lovers (OR=l .76; 95% Cl 2.86- 1.08), and obeying (OR=l .95; 95% Cl 1.01-3.80) friends; conventional fathers (OR=2.17; 95% Cl 1.27-3.72) and less likely to have independent mothers (OR=0.57; 95% Cl 0.32-0.99) and hardworking friends (OR=0.58; 0.35- 0.95). It seems that significant others of RDAs are less likely to exhibit models of rational reactions in everyday life that prevent adolescents from developing rational personality, thus making it possible to increase the probability of regular drinking in adolescence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bergström ◽  
Annette Sverker ◽  
Åsa Larsson Ranada ◽  
Eva Valtersson ◽  
Ingrid Thyberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Levine ◽  
Annabelle Roberts ◽  
Taya R. Cohen

Difficult conversations are a necessary part of everyday life. To help children, employees, and partners learn and improve, parents, managers, and significant others are frequently tasked with the unpleasant job of delivering negative news and critical feedback. Despite the long-term benefits of these conversations, communicators approach them with trepidation, in part, because they perceive them as involving intractable moral conflict between being honest and being kind. In this article, we review recent research on egocentrism, ethics, and communication to explain why communicators overestimate the degree to which honesty and benevolence conflict during difficult conversations, document the conversational missteps people make as a result of this erred perception, and propose more effective conversational strategies that honor the long-term compatibility of honesty and benevolence. This review sheds light on the psychology of moral tradeoffs in conversation, and provides practical advice on how to deliver unpleasant information in ways that improve recipients’ welfare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-938
Author(s):  
Anna Cronin ◽  
Sharynne McLeod ◽  
Sarah Verdon

Purpose Children with a cleft palate (± cleft lip; CP±L) can have difficulties communicating and participating in daily life, yet speech-language pathologists typically focus on speech production during routine assessments. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY; World Health Organization, 2007 ) provides a framework for holistic assessment. This tutorial describes holistic assessment of children with CP±L illustrated by data collected from a nonclinical sample of seven 2- to 3-year-old children, 13 parents, and 12 significant others (e.g., educators and grandparents). Method Data were collected during visits to participants' homes and early childhood education and care centers. Assessment tools applicable to domains of the ICF-CY were used to collect and analyze data. Child participants' Body Functions including speech, language, and cognitive development were assessed using screening and standardized assessments. Participants' Body Structures were assessed via oral motor examination, case history questionnaires, and observation. Participants' Activities and Participation as well as Environmental and Personal Factors were examined through case history questionnaires, interviews with significant others, parent report measures, and observations. Results Valuable insights can be gained from undertaking holistic speech-language pathology assessments with children with CP±L. Using multiple tools allowed for triangulation of data and privileging different viewpoints, to better understand the children and their contexts. Several children demonstrated speech error patterns outside of what are considered cleft speech characteristics, which underscores the importance of a broader assessment. Conclusion Speech-language pathologists can consider incorporating evaluation of all components and contextual factors of the ICF-CY when assessing and working with young children with CP±L to inform intervention and management practices.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketevan Mamiseishvili

In this paper, I will illustrate the changing nature and complexity of faculty employment in college and university settings. I will use existing higher education research to describe changes in faculty demographics, the escalating demands placed on faculty in the work setting, and challenges that confront professors seeking tenure or administrative advancement. Boyer’s (1990) framework for bringing traditionally marginalized and neglected functions of teaching, service, and community engagement into scholarship is examined as a model for balancing not only teaching, research, and service, but also work with everyday life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document