The Prognostic Implications of an Immunological Classification of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-189
Author(s):  
I. Asfour ◽  
G. Mathe ◽  
J.L. Misset ◽  
M.S. Sabbour
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (25) ◽  
pp. 6330-6337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  

Abstract Immunophenotypic classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has well-recognized prognostic implications. The significance of CD20 expression has been evaluated in childhood precursor B-lineage ALL with conflicting results. We retrospectively analyzed the influence of CD20 expression on outcome in 253 adults with de novo precursor B-lineage ALL treated with either conventional (VAD/CVAD) or intensive (hyper-CVAD) frontline chemotherapy regimens in the pre-rituximab era. Overall, CD20 positivity of at least 20% was associated with lower 3-year rates of complete remission duration (CRD; 20% vs 55%, P < .001) and overall survival (OS; 27% vs 40%, p = .03). In the CD20 negative subset, the 3-year rates for CRD (58% vs 42%, p = .04) and OS (60% vs 28%, P < .001) were superior for hyper-CVAD compared with VAD/CVAD; rates were particularly favorable for the CD20 negative younger age group (68% and 85%, respectively). In contrast, 3-year CRD and OS rates were uniformly poor for the CD20-positive group regardless of therapy (27% or less). Multivariate analysis for event-free survival identified older age, leukocyte count higher than 30 × 109/L, presence of Philadelphia chromosome, high systemic risk classification, and CD20 positivity as independent predictors of worse outcome. In conclusion, CD20 expression in de novo adult precursor B-lineage ALL appears to be associated with a poor prognosis. Incorporation of monoclonal antibodies directed against CD20 into frontline chemotherapy regimens warrants investigation.


1991 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinpei Nakazawa ◽  
Midori Saito ◽  
Toshiko Okazaki ◽  
Keiko Takane ◽  
Kanji Sugita ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S33-S34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara Davis ◽  
Zinaida Good ◽  
Jolanda Sarno ◽  
Astraea Jager ◽  
Nikolay Samusik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1079-1109
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Brown ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Patricia Aoun ◽  
Michael W. Boyer ◽  
...  

The NCCN Guidelines for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk assessment and stratification for risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL for both adolescent and young adult and adult patients; and supportive care considerations. Given the complexity of ALL treatment regimens and the required supportive care measures, the NCCN ALL Panel recommends that patients be treated at a specialized cancer center with expertise in the management of ALL This portion of the Guidelines focuses on the management of Ph-positive and Ph-negative ALL in adolescents and young adults, and management in relapsed settings.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Roland B Walter

The acute leukemias are malignant clonal disorders characterized by aberrant differentiation and proliferation of transformed hematopoietic progenitor cells. These cells accumulate within the bone marrow and lead to suppression of the production of normal blood cells, with resulting symptoms from varying degrees of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia or from infiltration into tissues. They are currently classified by their presumed cell of origin, although the field is moving rapidly to genetic subclassification. This review covers epidemiology; etiology; classification of leukemia by morphology, immunophenotyping, and cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities; cytogenetics of acute leukemia; general principles of therapy; acute myeloid leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; and future possibilities. The figure shows the incidence of acute leukemias in the United States. Tables list World Health Organization (WHO) classification of acute myeloid leukemia and related neoplasms, expression of cell surface and cytoplasmic markers for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, WHO classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WHO classification of acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage, WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes, European LeukemiaNet cytogenetic and molecular genetic subsets in acute myeloid leukemia with prognostic importance, cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, terminology used in leukemia treatment, and treatment outcome for adults with acute leukemia. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 9 tables, and 117 references.


Blood ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA Fletcher ◽  
EA Lynch ◽  
VM Kimball ◽  
M Donnelly ◽  
R Tantravahi ◽  
...  

Abstract The prognostic implications of t(9;22)(q34;q11) were assessed at a median follow-up of 3.5 years in 434 children receiving intensive treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Four-year event-free and overall survivals were 81% and 88%, respectively, in 419 children lacking t(9;22), but were 0% and 20%, respectively, in 15 children with t(9;22) (P less than .001). Poor outcome for children with t(9;22)- positive ALL was particularly notable because we have reported improved survival in other historically poor prognosis ALL cytogenetic categories when treated with similarly intensive therapy. We recommend that very intensive treatment approaches, including bone marrow transplantation in first remission, be considered for all children with t(9;22)-positive ALL.


Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 2394-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
JE Goasguen ◽  
JM Dossot ◽  
O Fardel ◽  
F Le Mee ◽  
E Le Gall ◽  
...  

Abstract Immunocytochemical detection of the multidrug resistance (MDR)- associated membrane protein (P-170) was performed at time of diagnosis in a series of 36 children and 23 adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using two monoclonal antibodies JSB1 and C219. Immunophenotypes were obtained in all cases and karyotypes were analyzed in 37 cases. Detection with JSB1 or with C219 led to similar results in terms of positive cells and cases, but the intensity of staining was higher with JSB1. In the populations studied, the rate of first complete remission differed between MDR-positive and MDR-negative in adult patients only (56% v 93%, respectively, P = .05). Of the 16 MDR-positive patients who had presented a first complete remission, 13 (81%) relapsed, compared with 13 of 35 (37%) MDR-negative (P = .008) patients. A higher rate of relapse among MDR-positive compared with MDR- negative patients was observed in adults and in children taken separately (adults 100% v 46%; children 73% v 32%, respectively). The survival rates (Kaplan-Meier method) were significantly higher in MDR- negative compared with MDR-positive populations as a whole (P = .002) and among children (P = .05) and adults (P = .03) taken separately. Event-free survival curves followed this trend. The percentage of second complete remission was very low in the MDR-positive group (15%) compared with 38% for the MDR-negative group. These results were shown by multivariate analysis to be independent of age, immunophenotypes, and karyotypes and clearly show the importance of MDR phenotype detection in ALL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document